Page 52 of 64 FirstFirst ... 242505152535462 ... LastLast
Results 511 to 520 of 633

Thread: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

  1. #511
    Tenacious
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    41,446

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
    My thoughts.

    I believe that it is intended to mean all the people, collectively and/or individually. That is my interpretation.

    However, I do know people who believe it means the government's military, and I know these people personally and I also know them to be absolutely sincere in their beliefs. They claim that the words "well regulated" means government sponsored and approved, because, well, who else would 'regulate'?

    I wholly disagree with them, but I do not question the sincerity of their position.
    In the usage of the times, 'regulated' did refer to training.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aberration View Post
    See thatís the problem with believing the devils lies. The unborn arenít imaginary.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  2. #512
    Aussie Aussie Aussie.....
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    60,782

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by Thoreau72 View Post
    Rationalize it any way you need to VM, and don't even address the Brown Shoe Army event.

    Your first post theorized and suggested that we have not reached the point where US troops fire on US civilians. I merely pointed out we reached that point decades ago. US troops will indeed fire on US civilians.
    Thats not much of an answer to the relative comments abut your use of Kent State as an example.

  3. #513
    Professor

    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:32 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    2,419

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by ttwtt78640 View Post
    Militia is the term used for a defense force comprised of ordinary citizens and well regulated means trained and equipped. What is equally important, in the context of the 2A, is whether the people refers to only those people currently (or likely to be) engaged in militia activities.
    Everywhere in the Constitution "the people" refers to ordinary citizens. That has been accepted by the courts from day one. For some reason you think the term only refers to militia members in this case?

  4. #514
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Seen
    01-25-18 @ 12:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    77

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
    The Second Amendment to the Constitution: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    Please focus on only the three words on bold. No thing else, no other part. What do they mean? Is their meaning clear, or open to interpretation?

    Is a militia the people in general, or is it a state-sponsored organized and approved government body? Does the fact that "Militia" is capitalized lean toward an organized government body (as a formal name, essentially), or is that irrelevant? Maybe just grammatical peculiarities of the day.

    If you believe their meaning is clear, why do many people have other definitions? Are they being dishonest and/or insincere?

    Thoughts?
    I know I'm coming into this late (just joined the forum) but here are my thoughts:

    "Well regulated", when used in a martial context, means properly equipped and functioning as expected. Even today, when someone has a firearm that shoots to the correct point of aim, then it is said that the sights are "properly regulated."

    During the War of 1812 there were a number of critical battles where the brunt of the fighting was borne by militia units instead of Army units. Dispatches from the field complimented the militiamen's "fine regulation"; i.e. they were praising their courage, skill at arms, and discipline under fire, NOT how well the government had controlled them!

    I am well-equipped, trained, and practiced with my personal defensive equipment. I am, in the Constitutional sense, "well-regulated."

  5. #515
    Sage
    Oozlefinch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    State of Jefferson
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:34 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    11,858

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by 6gunner View Post
    During the War of 1812 there were a number of critical battles where the brunt of the fighting was borne by militia units instead of Army units. Dispatches from the field complimented the militiamen's "fine regulation"; i.e. they were praising their courage, skill at arms, and discipline under fire, NOT how well the government had controlled them!
    It goes even deeper than that.

    In 1792, there were 2 different Militia Acts. The first (2 May 1792) authorized the President to call up the militias of the various states in the event of invasion, rebellion, or disaster.

    6 days later on 8 May 1792 the second Militia Act was enacted. That Act conscripted every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45 into a local militia company (this was later expanded to all males, regardless of race, between the ages of 18 and 54 in 1862). So once again, the Militia was composed of every adult male citizen, not just individuals who decided to join.

    And every 6 months every male member of the militia had to appear to a bi-annual muster with the following items:

    "A musket, bayonet and belt, two spare flints, a cartridge box with 24 bullets, and a knapsack. Men owning rifles were required to provide a powder horn, ľ pound of gunpowder, 20 rifle balls, a shooting pouch, and a knapsack."

    This was the state of things until the Militia Act of 1903, which created the National Guard and Army Reserve we have today.

    But even until the Spanish-American War you had individuals form their own militias, then offer their services to the US Government. Most of the units in the Civil War started that way. And as late as 1898 you had the 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry Regiment. More famously known as the "Rough Riders", this was a unit created by Theodore Roosevelt, and then offered to the Government for service. Teddy was then placed as second in command after it was accepted, and Colonel Leonard Wood was placed in command.

    Interesting side note. In 1917 after the US entered WWI, Congress authorized President Roosevelt to raise 4 divisions of volunteers to fight in the war. However, the Secretary of War opposed this action, and President Wilson opposed it as well. The recruitment of the first Regiment was already under way, and command was offered to Colonel Charles Young (the senior black Officer in the Army). Young had already been forced to resign, when higher Army officers realized that if he went to Europe in command of Black soldiers, his rank would guarantee that he would be promoted to Brigadier General, and white troops would be placed under his command.

    All of that ultimately made the idea political poison, and it was ultimately scrapped in late 1917.
    War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. - John Stuart Mill

  6. #516
    Educator
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    07-13-18 @ 10:23 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    875

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
    The Second Amendment to the Constitution: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    Please focus on only the three words on bold. No thing else, no other part. What do they mean? Is their meaning clear, or open to interpretation?

    Is a militia the people in general, or is it a state-sponsored organized and approved government body? Does the fact that "Militia" is capitalized lean toward an organized government body (as a formal name, essentially), or is that irrelevant? Maybe just grammatical peculiarities of the day.

    If you believe their meaning is clear, why do many people have other definitions? Are they being dishonest and/or insincere?

    Thoughts?
    They were stating why a well regulated militia is necessary. Nothing more. It is up to the people to determine how well and regulated they need to be armed to defend against an overbearing authorative threat.

  7. #517
    Professor
    enderpotato00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,867

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    A well-regulated militia is a requirement for a healthy free state. The militia could be the last defense in case lets say the US military is destroyed. Again just saying.
    Donald Trump isn't the best president, but he is still our president #MAGA

  8. #518
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    US, California - federalist
    Last Seen
    10-16-18 @ 12:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    12,397

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
    The Second Amendment to the Constitution: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    Please focus on only the three words on bold. No thing else, no other part. What do they mean? Is their meaning clear, or open to interpretation?

    Is a militia the people in general, or is it a state-sponsored organized and approved government body? Does the fact that "Militia" is capitalized lean toward an organized government body (as a formal name, essentially), or is that irrelevant? Maybe just grammatical peculiarities of the day.

    If you believe their meaning is clear, why do many people have other definitions? Are they being dishonest and/or insincere?

    Thoughts?
    The People are the Militia. Well regulated militia of the People are declared Necessary.

    Well regulated must be defined by our federal Congress.

  9. #519
    Sage
    ataraxia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,610

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by enderpotato00 View Post
    A well-regulated militia is a requirement for a healthy free state. The militia could be the last defense in case lets say the US military is destroyed. Again just saying.
    We already have a well regulated militia. It's called the National Guard.

    The modern Army National Guard traces its origins to 13 December 1636, the day the Massachusetts Bay Colony's General Court passed an act calling for the creation of three regiments by organizing existing separate militia companies in the towns around Boston.[2] The creation of the militia regiments was caused by the perceived need to defend the Bay Colony against American Indians, as well as colonists and military members from other European countries who were operating in North America, including: the French in what is now Canada; the Spanish in what is now Florida, The Carolinas, and Georgia; and the Dutch in what was then New Netherland, which comprised what is now parts of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.[3][4]

    The General Court required that all able-bodied men between ages 16 and 60, except judges and clergy members, be considered members of the colony's militia, which was organized as the North, South, and East Regiments. Militia members were required to equip themselves, take part in regular training, and report to their units when called.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...National_Guard

  10. #520
    Professor
    enderpotato00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,867

    Re: 2A definition: "...well regulated Militia..."

    Quote Originally Posted by ataraxia View Post
    We already have a well regulated militia. It's called the National Guard.
    I'm talking about for citizens.
    Donald Trump isn't the best president, but he is still our president #MAGA

Page 52 of 64 FirstFirst ... 242505152535462 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •