• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2nd Amendment limits exercise of 1st Amendment

TurtleDude said:
what are you babbling about? you make no sense whatsoever. You apparently don't understand the constitution
Click to expand...

Couldn't answer it could you, so you had to just blurb out something ridiculous.
 
Media_Truth said:
Couldn't answer it could you, so you had to just blurb out something ridiculous.
Click to expand...

I think those who understand this issue see your posts as psychobabble
 
TurtleDude said:
I think those who understand this issue see your posts as psychobabble
Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah, most resort to name-calling, when they have no other argument. Maybe somebody else can answer - why does the NRA excludes the "military" portion of the 2nd Amendment from their quote that's posted on the walls of their headquarters?
 
Media_Truth said:
Yeah, yeah, most resort to name-calling, when they have no other argument. Maybe somebody else can answer - why does the NRA excludes the "military" portion of the 2nd Amendment from their quote that's posted on the walls of their headquarters?
Click to expand...

because it is not relevant to the right that the second amendment guarantees-that right being an individual right of free men to be armed and that is based on the natural right of self defense that the founders believed men had from the dawn of known time

only morons would claim that one had to be in a government regulated entity to exercise a right ALL the founders held existed before the creation of the government.
 
Media_Truth said:
A friend of mine moved here from Europe. He was told to "get a gun, if you're traveling around the States". So he did. His comment to me - "It was way too easy." He repeated this over and over. "Easy Access" is an issue, just like the items that you brought up are issues.
Click to expand...

Did he commit a crime with the gun? No? Then how was access an issue? Again. If it were the access to guns causing the crimes...there would be MILLIONS of murders each year. We don't have that.

If you want to see violence go down...solve the drug trade (legalization), and slam current violent gang related offenders with life sentences with no parole and no visitations from anyone, target gang recruiters and threaten them with the same punishments, provide leniency to anyone resigning from gangs, target children who are more likely to be gang members...give them ways to stay out, increase mental health care. And then you need to deal with domestic and addiction related issues as well.

You will see rates PLUMMET. Do you disagree? At least with the idea (not the method of targeting of gangs per say)?

Why do you think none of the above will ever happen?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
blackjack50 said:
Did he commit a crime with the gun? No? Then how was access an issue? Again. If it were the access to guns causing the crimes...there would be MILLIONS of murders each year. We don't have that.

If you want to see violence go down...solve the drug trade (legalization), and slam current violent gang related offenders with life sentences with no parole and no visitations from anyone, target gang recruiters and threaten them with the same punishments, provide leniency to anyone resigning from gangs, target children who are more likely to be gang members...give them ways to stay out, increase mental health care. And then you need to deal with domestic and addiction related issues as well.

You will see rates PLUMMET. Do you disagree? At least with the idea (not the method of targeting of gangs per say)?

Why do you think none of the above will ever happen?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I said these are part of the issue, did I not? And so is easy access to guns.
 
TurtleDude said:
because it is not relevant to the right that the second amendment guarantees-that right being an individual right of free men to be armed and that is based on the natural right of self defense that the founders believed men had from the dawn of known time

only morons would claim that one had to be in a government regulated entity to exercise a right ALL the founders held existed before the creation of the government.
Click to expand...

If it's not relevant, why was put in the constitution in the first place? How moronic is that?
 
Media_Truth said:
If it's not relevant, why was put in the constitution in the first place? How moronic is that?
Click to expand...

what part of the constitution delegated any power to the federal government to restrict, ban, or control what firearms private citizens own, use, keep or possess?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom