The RNC has Michigan in its sights

[Simon W. Moon]

no because there is no need for presumption of validity as it hurts no one, except those who would try to forge a signature on a vote.
it's like your asking if we could pretend evidence is NOT valid to presume someone innocent, in lieu of looking at actual evidence of a crime.
no we can't do that, but we can give them the presumption of innocence until said evidence is seen as beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
your analogy is a step too late in the process.

Are you able to explain how the presumption of validity prevents the inspection of signatures?

 

[Hypothetical]

Are you able to explain how the presumption of validity prevents the inspection of signatures?

Pretty obvious...why would you need to check signatures if you "presume validity"?

yet the signatures SHOULD be checked. So screw "presuming validity".

 

[Mycroft]

Lol anyone thinks this began under Lara

How long before this lawfare gets kicked to the curb?

And it will.

This isn't lawfare. It's just law.

 

[mike2810]

Your Senate's audit is the source.

You mean the partisan audit that has been debunked. Got it.
Interesting you could not provide a link to the source. Unlike what I provided.

Of course they disagree. Hell, they opposed the audit being conducted, too.

But the evidence shows they are lying. Too bad your AG didn't hold them to account.

Sorry, Just look how Kari Lake won all the did in challenging the elections she lost.

on a side note: Still waiting for Trump supporters to provide a source that proves "election fraud" in 2020.

With all the audits, recounts, investigations, etc. what you are hammering about does not hold up.
Where is your evidence.

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Pretty obvious...why would you need to check signatures if you "presume validity"?

yet the signatures SHOULD be checked. So screw "presuming validity".

pretty obvious . . .

the same reason we still need to have trials even though we presume innocence

 

[jnug]

pretty obvious . . .

the same reason we still need to have trials even though we presume innocence

Ever notice that whenever the righties think they have you by the balls they actually have their own balls in their hands and don't realize it till they squeeze....sort of like anti-women's reproductive rights and IVF. Whoops. God, they are insufferably stupid.

 

[brianpatrick]

Sounds like some kind of fake news to me.

Yeah but we all know it doesn’t sound like that to you because you heard the recording of it like we all did. You may argue that it was taken out of context or didn’t mean what it sounded like, but most fully formed adults would view this stance with a fair amount of skepticism, leading them to conclude that your position is one of pure politics, holding nothing of value beyond throwing dirt clods at the group across the alley from you.