• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So the repubs guy Volker, blew the Biden consipracy theory out of the water

less right said:
If Volker supported Trump in his testimony I'm sure he would become credible again.
Click to expand...

Wrong again
The testimony of all these witnesses are a waste of time and money. In the long run it will change nothing. In the short run nothing gets done.
Next November don’t vote for Trump, that’s the solution to all your sleepless nights.

The damaging evidence for anti Trumpers is the president of Ukraine and the transcript, not the different opinions of the Trump haters. Guessing someone’s intent or speculation is not evidence.
If the democrats want an expert witness to testify have them call a constitutional lawyer.
 
Mycroft said:
I'm listening to Sondland as I type this. I'll continue to listen to him until he's done.

But I must say that so far I have heard nothing that indicates anything was done for Trump's political/personal purposes.
Click to expand...
:lamo

Trump defenders just can't help but lie.
 
Outlook said:
Wrong again
The testimony of all these witnesses are a waste of time and money. In the long run it will change nothing. In the short run nothing gets done.
Next November don’t vote for Trump, that’s the solution to all your sleepless nights.

The damaging evidence for anti Trumpers is the president of Ukraine and the transcript, not the different opinions of the Trump haters. Guessing someone’s intent or speculation is not evidence.
If the democrats want an expert witness to testify have them call a constitutional lawyer.
Click to expand...

If a constitutional scholar could make the case that what Trump attempted was 'constitutional', Republicans would call one.
 
The constitution says that Trump can do whatever he wants and Congress can't ask any questions. Right?
 
Digger said:
The constitution says that Trump can do whatever he wants and Congress can't ask any questions. Right?
Click to expand...
That's the Constitution that apparently only Republicans have ever read. Though, in fairness, that Constitution only seems to exist when a Republican is President...
 
less right said:
If a constitutional scholar could make the case that what Trump attempted was 'constitutional', Republicans would call one.
Click to expand...

The republicans will call whom ever Schiff will allow. It’s the democrats circus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom