• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller may have a conflict — and it leads directly to a Russian oligarch

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,244
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
[FONT=&quot]Special counsel [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Robert Mueller[/FONT][FONT=&quot] has withstood relentless political attacks, many distorting his record of distinguished government service.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]But there’s one episode even Mueller’s former law enforcement comrades — and independent ethicists — acknowledge raises legitimate legal issues and a possible conflict of interest in his overseeing the Russia election probe.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, [/FONT]the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska[FONT=&quot] to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, Robert Levinson, captured in Iran while working for the CIA in 2007.[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Yes, that’s the same Deripaska who has surfaced in Mueller’s current investigation and who was recently sanctioned by the Trump administration.[/FONT]
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...t-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarch

Oops. This is turning into a right mess for Mr. Mueller.
 
Mueller will probably have some explaining to do when either or both Manafort's and Flynn's lawyers bring this up in court.
 

Nope- read about the agent- I have readabout this case for mnay years

What did Mueller do that is such a conflict that saving an Agents life makes him disqualified.

Now go ahead and pretend you care about that agent who is in all likelihood dead
You keep sinking lower and lower.
Is there no level that Spanksters like yourself will not sink to?
 
I read the article but I still don't have any idea as to why this would be a conflict. Because the FBI worked with the guy on a particular objective while Mueller ran it a decade ago? I don't get it.

They are investigating the possibility of "collusion" with the Russians, and one of their targets is someone they not only worked with, got to pay 25 million in his own money to help but has gotten special visa's to visit the States. That leads to some "hmmm" moments and could cause legal issues for Mueller's probe.
 
I read the article but I still don't have any idea as to why this would be a conflict. Because the FBI worked with the guy on a particular objective while Mueller ran it a decade ago? I don't get it.

Post 4. Neither do I.
 
I signed on about a year ago, here @ DP. There was a definitive grasp of straws by the anti-Trumpers. I was one of those posters and have mellowed somewhat. Every little misstep was “the one” that was going to end this Presidency. The pendulum has swung significantly to the other side. Now it seems that the supporters are the ones grasping at straws that favor the President’s position. This thread for example, the other Michael Cohen bank records, the Russian catering company that wasn’t supposed to exist at the time of the election........and on and on...
 
I read the article but I still don't have any idea as to why this would be a conflict. Because the FBI worked with the guy on a particular objective while Mueller ran it a decade ago? I don't get it.

He has ties to Russian oligarchs.
 
Nope- read about the agent- I have readabout this case for mnay years

What did Mueller do that is such a conflict that saving an Agents life makes him disqualified.

Now go ahead and pretend you care about that agent who is in all likelihood dead
You keep sinking lower and lower.
Is there no level that Spanksters like yourself will not sink to?

he U.S. government in April imposed sanctions on Deripaska, one of several prominent Russians targeted to punish Vladimir Putin — using the same sort of allegations that State used from 2006 to 2009. Yet, between those two episodes, Deripaska seemed good enough for the FBI to ask him to fund that multimillion-dollar rescue mission and to allow him into the country eight times.

I was alerted to Deripaska’s past FBI relationship by U.S. officials who wondered whether the Russian’s conspicuous absence from Mueller’s indictments might be related to his FBI work.

They aren’t the only ones.

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told me he believes Mueller has a conflict of interest because his FBI previously accepted financial help from a Russian that is, at the very least, a witness in the current probe.

“The real question becomes whether it was proper to leave [Deripaska] out of the Manafort indictment, and whether that omission was to avoid the kind of transparency that is really required by the law,” Dershowitz said.
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...t-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarch

As for the Agent, well it's clear in the Article that they couldn't get the deal done because of the State Dept. I don't' see you raising any ire with them, because well.. that would mean criticizing Saint Hillary and you can't do that.
 
Nope- read about the agent- I have readabout this case for mnay years

What did Mueller do that is such a conflict that saving an Agents life makes him disqualified.

Now go ahead and pretend you care about that agent who is in all likelihood dead
You keep sinking lower and lower.
Is there no level that Spanksters like yourself will not sink to?

go ahead and pretend you actually care about russia at all. the right wing tried to tell you about the dangers of them, but you left wing extremists laughed it off. then what happened during obamas same term? thanks

 
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...t-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarch

As for the Agent, well it's clear in the Article that they couldn't get the deal done because of the State Dept. I don't' see you raising any ire with them, because well.. that would mean criticizing Saint Hillary and you can't do that.

Shifting gears, yet again you shift the topic. Perhaps read other OP's and learn how to present one.

Now how is he conflicted. FBI deals with criminals all the time, same as Intel Agencies.
 
go ahead and pretend you actually care about russia at all. the right wing tried to tell you about the dangers of them, but you left wing extremists laughed it off. then what happened during obamas same term? thanks



Could you try to be coherent as I do not see your point?
 
Could you try to be coherent as I do not see your point?

you pretend to be outraged about "trump and russia" yet you left wing radicals voted for the man that laughed and said the cold war is over. then during his SAME term, russia hacks.

that says a lot about your loyalties.
 
you pretend to be outraged about "trump and russia" yet you left wing radicals voted for the man that laughed and said the cold war is over. then during his SAME term, russia hacks.

that says a lot about your loyalties.

I can swear on the Bible that I did not vote for HRC, nor an independent.
 
Shifting gears, yet again you shift the topic. Perhaps read other OP's and learn how to present one.

Now how is he conflicted. FBI deals with criminals all the time, same as Intel Agencies.

That's nice.
 
I can swear on the Bible that I did not vote for HRC, nor an independent.

who mentioned HRC? this happened during obama.

are you swearing on the bible that you didnt vote for obama?
 
who mentioned HRC? this happened during obama.

are you swearing on the bible that you didnt vote for obama?

I swear I did not, nor an independent.
 
I swear I did not, nor an independent.

i find it hard to believe the radical left but i cant prove you did or did not vote for him. either way, you defend him constantly. the same guy who colluded with russia and in his same term, we were hacked coincidentally. you may not have voted for him, but you still support him.

unless of course youre going to condemn him now...
 
i find it hard to believe the radical left but i cant prove you did or did not vote for him. either way, you defend him constantly. the same guy who colluded with russia and in his same term, we were hacked coincidentally. you may not have voted for him, but you still support him.

unless of course youre going to condemn him now...

I can -my 500 donation to your 50 that I can prove my point. Ya got 60 seconds to take me up.
 
I can -my 500 donation to your 50 that I can prove my point. Ya got 60 seconds to take me up.

so you agree that obamas collusion with russia to be more flexible after the election was pretty suspicious? especially when laughing when romney said they were our biggest geopolitical threat?
 
so you agree that obamas collusion with russia to be more flexible after the election was pretty suspicious? especially when laughing when romney said they were our biggest geopolitical threat?

Come on I will go up to 1 K. Take me on big boy. Otherwise you are scared
 
Back
Top Bottom