• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Las Vegas Demonstrates: You ARE Your Brother's Keeper; Mental Health, Not Guns, Root of Problem

JBG

DP Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2017
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
960
Location
New York City area
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
I started this as a response to a post and decided it needed a new thread. While there may be a bit of Islamism mixed in with Paddock's motives, but without a mental health problem Paddock would not have been interested in converting to a violent ideology and using it to the hilt.
We need to stop pretending that implementing more gun control laws will prevent mass shootings from happening. There are other ways to address this issue, like improving our mental health care system, for example. Infringing on the rights of legal gun owners is not going to help anyone.
I appreciate your efforts to focus discussion on what I see as real causes of Las Vegas, Sandy Hook, Charleston and most similar mass slayings.

I came to be conscious of this issue with McGovern's cashiering of Eagleton as a candidate in the 1972 campaign. This sorry episode is part of what started my path away from believing that liberals are necessarily good people. I had thought they really believed in love, help and compassion before that. I was 15 at time, and had bought into the "peace, love and helping hand" myth the liberals and Democrats presented themselves as adhering to. I believed strongly then, and still do believe, that people are capable of making something of themselves after facing obstacles. To have unceremoniously tossed such a person off the ticket showed a total lack of spine and leadership we see all too often.
In recent years there have been other mass shootings. Jared Lochner, James Holmes, Elliot Rodger (Santa Barbara) and Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook) come to mind. All of these people were obviously troubled. All of these people, except maybe Adam Lanza, were in regular contact with other students, teachers and administrators at their respective schools. Dylan Roof was in regular contact with friends, roommates and his parents. The societal problem is that it is easier to ignore people who are not sociable and not pleasant to be with than to engage them.

With this horrific church massacre, we are treated to lectures about gun control and about racism. People forget that both in this episode and Sandy Hook parents without any apparent mental health pathologies were the ones that obtained the weapons, not the mentally ill adult-aged children. Guns are everywhere so efforts to control legally purchased guns are doomed to futility. The most those laws will do is prevent people who would hurt no one from owning a gun.

Racism is similarly rife in society. But no one things that Dylan Roof was active in any anti-black political movement.

I suppose that liberals don't want to deal with mental health issues because that would mean getting involved with and spending real time with unpleasant people who don't make good social companions. That takes real time and effort. Learning more about those people and having people who are conscious of their ups and downs might prevent some, though certainly not all tragedies.

I am not saying it is the role of untrained people to be psychologists. Far from it. But when people are left friendless for long periods, and no one reaches out to them a tragedy will sometimes occur. It is our job, as a society, to know our neighbors, students and colleagues.

I feel that forming real communities will solve some of these problems. Trying to remove the implements of crime from people who are far beyond obeying any law of any kind is futile and useless.

It is far easier and more satisfying to inveigh against guns and racism. It feels good and typical for liberals that's what matters as was pointed out here.
 
It is far easier and more satisfying to inveigh against guns and racism. It feels good and typical for liberals that's what matters as was pointed out here.

You say this and yet you identify as a liberal. Cute.

Now let's destroy once and for all the myth that mental health is a significant risk factor for becoming a mass shooter.

https://gumc.georgetown.edu/news/Debunking-Myths-about-Gun-Violence-and-Mental-Health
https://www.forbes.com/sites/toddessig/2014/06/28/the-myth-of-mental-illness-and-gun-violence/ <- Forbes is a conservative magazine, BTW.
 
This is presuming that this shooter has a mental health problem. The slightly disappointing is that that is what police are going with, despite no prior diagnosis or evidence aside from aloofness. It truly has become the garbage dumpster explanation for criminality or evil in this country. In the absence of any other evidence, the easiest, politically guilt-free route is mental illness.

While it is still incredibly possible that Paddock had an undiagnosed SMI, we have to accept that the police are really struggling to figure this one out.
 
Last edited:
This sorry episode is part of what started my path away from believing that liberals are necessarily good people. I had thought they really believed in love, help and compassion before that.

You took a wrong turn. There is no single "liberal" mindset. When you start characterizing all liberals in terms of their motives then you go off the cliff.

I guess I would be considered a liberal. What defines my political views and I suspect that of most liberals is my opposition to corporate tyranny and abuse. And my opposition to unnecessary military engagements abroad. And finally my opposition to social conservatives.

1. Anti-corporate greed
2. Anti-war
3. Anti-drug war
4. Anti-discrimination of gays, women and minorities
5. Anti-religion in government

Now about guns, I think we would be so much better off if all guns just disappeared but that's not going to happen. I believe guns should be legal but should be strictly regulated. But I also think that liberals should just drop the issue because it alienates so many single issue voters who would otherwise be persuadable to the liberal causes I outlined above.

Actually, nothing kills more people in the U.S. and in South America than the drug war. It fuels gang violence everywhere and that's the greatest source of gun deaths. It has also turned us into the world leader in citizens incarcerated.
 
I agree with the trust of the OP of course, this is what societal breakdown looks like, and trying to regulate the tools to stop it is a fools errand.

We need to admit the problem, and we need to work on the problem.

FINALLY!
 
This is presuming that this shooter has a mental health problem. The slightly disappointing is that that is what police are going with, despite no prior diagnosis or evidence aside from aloofness. It truly has become the garbage dumpster explanation for criminality or evil in this country. In the absence of any other evidence, the easiest, politically guilt-free route is mental illness.

While it is still incredibly possible that Paddock had an undiagnosed SMI, we have to accept that the police are really struggling to figure this one out.
This is presuming that this shooter has a mental health problem. The slightly disappointing is that that is what police are going with, despite no prior diagnosis or evidence aside from aloofness. It truly has become the garbage dumpster explanation for criminality or evil in this country. In the absence of any other evidence, the easiest, politically guilt-free route is mental illness.

While it is still incredibly possible that Paddock had an undiagnosed SMI, we have to accept that the police are really struggling to figure this one out.
What gets me about this situation in Las Vegas is that no one seems to have known Paddock or has come forward. He apparently was educated enough to make an economic success of himself. He was married either once or twice, I'm not sure how often. He had to have been through at least 13 grades of schooling and probably college.

No one knows this guy? He's not from some community somewhere? If no one knows him why? Isn't that degree of reclusiveness going back to kindergarten emblematic of some mental health issue?
 
This is presuming that this shooter has a mental health problem. The slightly disappointing is that that is what police are going with, despite no prior diagnosis or evidence aside from aloofness. It truly has become the garbage dumpster explanation for criminality or evil in this country. In the absence of any other evidence, the easiest, politically guilt-free route is mental illness.

While it is still incredibly possible that Paddock had an undiagnosed SMI, we have to accept that the police are really struggling to figure this one out.

Someone who murders people has a mental health issue. Could YOU murder people? Strangers?
 
I agree with the trust of the OP of course, this is what societal breakdown looks like, and trying to regulate the tools to stop it is a fools errand.

We need to admit the problem, and we need to work on the problem.

FINALLY!

To say gun control can not be part of the solution is ridiculous
 
To say gun control can not be part of the solution is ridiculous
Gun control probably wouldn't hurt. But basically it's a feel-good measure. Do you really think Stephen Paddock would have said "I'm going to kill as many people as I can but the weapon better be legal"?
 
Someone who murders people has a mental health issue. Could YOU murder people? Strangers?
No, but I would also be a bad example for you, because I do have mental health issues (at one time or another having qualified for the youth equivalent of SMI).

Though, perhaps this would be a good example, in that I would represent the overwhelming majority of those with mental illness who do no such things. Furthermore, it's typically you "sane" people doing all the killing. ;)

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
To say gun control can not be part of the solution is ridiculous

Sure but how substantial or helpful that will be is yet to be seen, and I claim that is not where the focus has to be, at least not for now.
 
Sure but how substantial or helpful that will be is yet to be seen, and I claim that is not where the focus has to be, at least not for now.

We can do more than one thing at the same time
 
I agree. What could be a better time than now?
With the number of guns in circulation it's about as effective as yelling "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore." (Apologies to movie "Network" from around 1976). The only respect in which I support gun control is to create an easily convictable offense for someone arrested for another crime such as armed robbery, where witnesses may not wish to testify.
 
You say this and yet you identify as a liberal. Cute.

Now let's destroy once and for all the myth that mental health is a significant risk factor for becoming a mass shooter.

https://gumc.georgetown.edu/news/Debunking-Myths-about-Gun-Violence-and-Mental-Health
https://www.forbes.com/sites/toddessig/2014/06/28/the-myth-of-mental-illness-and-gun-violence/ <- Forbes is a conservative magazine, BTW.

“They” can publish all the crap they’d like to sell their books. Mass shooters are mentally ill. Period.
 
“They” can publish all the crap they’d like to sell their books. Mass shooters are mentally ill. Period.

Uh, no, public imagination notwithstanding, only 3-5% of violent gun deaths are caused by people with mental illness. Even with mass shooters, there is no great capability to make such predictions.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
With the number of guns in circulation it's about as effective as yelling "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore." (Apologies to movie "Network" from around 1976). The only respect in which I support gun control is to create an easily convictable offense for someone arrested for another crime such as armed robbery, where witnesses may not wish to testify.

I'm not willing to give up. I don't care if it takes a generation....and it might
 
Uh, no, public imagination notwithstanding, only 3-5% of violent gun deaths are caused by people with mental illness. Even with mass shooters, there is no great capability to make such predictions.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Bu I wasn’t referring to violent gun deaths, was I?
 
Bu I wasn’t referring to violent gun deaths, was I?
You are referring to a specific subset of that statistic, but you have no predictive framework to support your contention, because if we did, a whole industry could be substantially reformed after decades of failure.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
I suppose that liberals don't want to deal with mental health issues because that would mean getting involved with and spending real time with unpleasant people who don't make good social companions.

I spend alot of time reading gun control issues and there are plenty of Conservatives that dont want to 'deal' with mental health issues.

IMO, as a liberal and very strong supporter of the 2A, I definitely believe we need more focus on mental illness but I also see the many negative issues that would have to be resolved as well, such as the effects on our veterans, that it likely reduce the numbers of people seeking help, and the invasion of privacy rights, for starters.
 
I spend alot of time reading gun control issues and there are plenty of Conservatives that dont want to 'deal' with mental health issues.

IMO, as a liberal and very strong supporter of the 2A, I definitely believe we need more focus on mental illness but I also see the many negative issues that would have to be resolved as well, such as the effects on our veterans, that it likely reduce the numbers of people seeking help, and the invasion of privacy rights, for starters.
The problem is that we are seeing the issue of mental illness through the lens of gun control.

To be frank, the most pressing matter with mental illness and guns is suicide through personal firearms--not murder or mass murder.

Otherwise, it's not very connected at all.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
The problem is that we are seeing the issue of mental illness through the lens of gun control.

To be frank, the most pressing matter with mental illness and guns is suicide through personal firearms--not murder or mass murder.

Otherwise, it's not very connected at all.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

I agree suicide is by far the highest but many of the 'mass shootings' that so shock and then motivate anti-gun action are indeed committed by people on drugs prescribed for mental issues or are actually mentally ill. Most if I recall correctly.
 
I agree suicide is by far the highest but many of the 'mass shootings' that so shock and then motivate anti-gun action are indeed committed by people on drugs prescribed for mental issues or are actually mentally ill. Most if I recall correctly.
But even then, our predictive models are completely inconclusive about whether mental illness by itself is a substantial factor, let alone specific medications those individuals may or may not be taking.

Even when we take a specific subgroup of our identified subgroup--school mass shooters, we have very little to work with, including being able to find positive outcomes with interventions for at-risk youth.

These mass shootings often tell us more about out society than they do about the body of persons committing the acts.


Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom