Great cornoa numbers on their way...

[poweRob]

The numbers will be tremendous. Bestest in the world.

Coronavirus hospital data will now be sent to Trump administration instead of CDC

Hospital data on coronavirus patients will now be rerouted to the Trump administration instead of first being sent to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services confirmed to CNN on Tuesday.

The move could make data less transparent to the public at a time when the administration is downplaying the spread of the pandemic, and threatens to undermine public confidence that medical data is being presented free of political interference.​

Just another authoritarian move by Trump which will be lauded by his sheep.

*Misspelled Corona in title.

 

[Deuce]

You also misspelled misspelled.

 

[Michael Cole]

He's cutting his own throat. After hanging himself, jumping off a cliff and drinking poison

 

[poweRob]

You also misspelled misspelled.

I don't believe you.

 

[trouble13]

The numbers will be tremendous. Bestest in the world.

Coronavirus hospital data will now be sent to Trump administration instead of CDC

Hospital data on coronavirus patients will now be rerouted to the Trump administration instead of first being sent to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services confirmed to CNN on Tuesday.

The move could make data less transparent to the public at a time when the administration is downplaying the spread of the pandemic, and threatens to undermine public confidence that medical data is being presented free of political interference.​

Just another authoritarian move by Trump which will be lauded by his sheep.

*Miss spelled Corona in title.

I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret, it assures there isnt any political tampering but at the same time that same raw data should also be made available to his opposition to provide them with equal reassurance.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[poweRob]

I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret to assure there isnt any political tampering but at the same time that same raw data should also be made available to his opposition to provide them with equal reassurance.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Trump administration, known daily liars, to filter CDC data to the public. :lol:

 

[Linc]

Trump administration, known daily liars, to filter CDC data to the public. :lol:

The latest distraction(S) every single day.
A day in the life.

 

[Simon W. Moon]

I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret, it assures there isnt any political tampering...

Holy ****!

You believe a politician
when he says they're taking the data away from the experts and giving them to politicians
so there won't be any political tampering?​

HOOOOOLEEE **** that's backassard

 

[poweRob]

Holy ****!

You believe a politician
when he says they're taking the data away from the experts and giving them to politicians
so there won't be any political tampering?​

HOOOOOLEEE **** that's backassard

And it's trumpanzees who just love to call others' Joseph Goebbels while we get to see them cheer this obvious message and data control so the public only hears what trump adminstration want them to.

 

[trouble13]

Trump administration, known daily liars, to filter CDC data to the public. [emoji38]

Progressives are not exactly the stalwarts of truth. People who live in glass houses and all that...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[MaryP]

I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret, it assures there isnt any political tampering but at the same time that same raw data should also be made available to his opposition to provide them with equal reassurance.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Wait. What's wrong with this picture? Since when is the Center for Disease Control the "opposition" of the federal administration?
This whole thing is ridiculous, but I've already made my comments in the other thread on this.

 

[poweRob]

Progressives are not exactly the stalwarts of truth. People who live in glass houses and all that...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Ummm... do you have a point or is this just an off-topic personal attack on my lean?

 

[Mr Person]

I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret, it assures there isnt any political tampering but at the same time that same raw data should also be made available to his opposition to provide them with equal reassurance.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

How hopelessly slavish, moronic, and dishonest.

It ensures (not "assures") that there IS political tampering. Tampering by the Trump administration, that is. But you love corruption and hate American democracy, so I suppose that's a good result to you.

 

[trouble13]

Holy ****!

You believe a politician
when he says they're taking the data away from the experts and giving them to politicians
so there won't be any political tampering?​

HOOOOOLEEE **** that's backassard

Why did you selectively edit my post, are you auditioning for a job with the MSM?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Ummm... do you have a point or is this just an off-topic personal attack on my lean?

I think this is Trumpco customer speech.
Allow me to elucidate.

If you're not actively supporting Trump in the moment, you're what they call a "progressive" a "libtard" "traitor", or "neverTrumper"

Only people who are actively supporting Trump in the moment tell the truth.

if a person is not actively supporting Trump, they are telling lies

Try swapping that out in the posts of Trump supporters. See if it fits.
I think I got it right.

 

[Xilnik]

Why did you selectively edit my post, are you auditioning for a job with the MSM?

I guess you have never written a paper and cited sources before, but quoting someone and ending the quote with an ellipsis implies the original source had more information after what was quoted. Nothing was selectively edited; anyone with research experience would know to look at the original source to see what came after the ellipsis.

 

[trouble13]

Wait. What's wrong with this picture? Since when is the Center for Disease Control the "opposition" of the federal administration?
This whole thing is ridiculous, but I've already made my comments in the other thread on this.

Maybe they aren't but my point still remains unchanged. I have no objection to Trump asking the data be given to whoever he wants but I do object to the same data not being given to others. As much as I vehemently disagree with progressive positions I think Trump deserves criticism on this.
Why are you struggling to take yes for an answer?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[trouble13]

Ummm... do you have a point or is this just an off-topic personal attack on my lean?

Im pointing out that your position is hypocritical

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Why did you selectively edit my post, are you auditioning for a job with the MSM?

You have no reply to my post do you?
That's why you're trying to pretend you think I changed the meaning of your words.

But we both know the meaning was unaltered by leaving out the rest of your post.

I quoted the bit I was responding to.


Quote and bold the part which changes the meaning of what you said and makes it mean something different then the bit I quoted.

trouble13 posted

"I understand why Trump wants raw data directly given to his people to interpret, it assures there isnt any political tampering but at the same time that same raw data should also be made available to his opposition to provide them with equal reassurance.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk"​

Also you should explain how exactly the CDC fail to qualify as "Trump's people"
.
.
.
.
.
.
Is it because of the Trumpco principle:

if any person is not actively supporting Trump, they are telling lies​

 

[poweRob]

Im pointing out that your position is hypocritical

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You pointed out no examples of hypocrisy.

 

[trouble13]

How hopelessly slavish, moronic, and dishonest.

It ensures (not "assures") that there IS political tampering. Tampering by the Trump administration, that is. But you love corruption and hate American democracy, so I suppose that's a good result to you.

How is advocating for transparency ensuring that? I am litterally agreeing that the CDC should not be excluded from recieving the data and your still bitching. Its mind boggling to me.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[trouble13]

I guess you have never written a paper and cited sources before, but quoting someone and ending the quote with an ellipsis implies the original source had more information after what was quoted. Nothing was selectively edited; anyone with research experience would know to look at the original source to see what came after the ellipsis.

Ok so next time I will simply reference people to look up my entire post if they want to see why his accusation was completely bogus.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[Simon W. Moon]

How is advocating for transparency ensuring that? I am litterally agreeing that the CDC should not be excluded from recieving the data and your still bitching. Its mind boggling to me.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The CDC makes their data publicly available.
How does sending data away from the people who make it publicly available increase transparency?
please explain


If it's just about transparency, why not just send the numbers somewhere else TOO?
Why send the numbers somewhere else INSTEAD?

Why not have copies sent to the CDC AND where ever else?

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Ok so next time I will simply reference people to look up my entire post if they want to see why his accusation was completely bogus.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Or, you could quote the bit from your post which changes the meaning
if such a bit exists in your post I mean.

If there's no such bit, you can just point out that not all of your post was worth quoting and pretend that is a point.

 

[digitusmedius]

You also misspelled misspelled.

The OP's correction:

*Misspelled Corona in title.

Did he, though?