• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CO Judge 'agrees to order banning threats and intimidation' Against DJT

ouch

Air Muscle
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
10,100
Reaction score
8,794
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
A shoutout goes to Judge Wallace in CO. Why wait for DJT's "threats and intimidation" when it's only a matter of time that he does this crap as usual.
(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)



1695486828780.png
I 100% understand everybody's concerns for the parties, the lawyers, and frankly myself and my staff based on what we've seen in other cases,” District Judge Sarah B. Wallace said as she agreed to the protective order.

The order prohibits parties in the case from making threatening or intimidating statements. Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state representing Trump in the case, opposed it. He said a protective order was unnecessary because threats and intimidation already are prohibited by law.

It was sought by lawyers for the liberal group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which is seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot under a rarely used Civil War-era clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
 
**** this case. **** the assholes pushing it. I hope bad stuff happens to them all.

Was that threatening or intimidating enough?
 
**** this case. **** the assholes pushing it. I hope bad stuff happens to them all.

Was that threatening or intimidating enough?
If you were a party, maybe.
 
If you were a party, maybe.
So Trump just needs to find someone not a party to do his threats and intimidation? Good to know.
 
**** this case. **** the assholes pushing it. I hope bad stuff happens to them all.

Was that threatening or intimidating enough?
That's quite a broad-brush of a "bad stuff" wish list. Do you have a specific short list that stands alone "to them all"?
 
Back
Top Bottom