Climate scientist explains people are not appreciating how big the problem is

[watsup]

This all started out with the West being found guilty until proven innocent. Given this whole theory is virtually a science free zone there is no hope that that will ever change given the taxpayer Trillions its now worth per annum for those promoting it.

We were all told as far back as 1988 by James Hansen that the 'debate was over' on AGW (Do you remember any debate because I certainly don't ?) We were presented with a fait accompli so pay up prolls ..... ker ching !

It is hardly a coincidence that the following year the Wall fell and communism failed and the UN made its first declaration of 'clock is ticking' climate doom . The usual suspects then happily swapped their red flag for a green one and the rest (or is it the West?) is history

Standard denier talking points.

 

[longview]

This all started out with the West being found guilty until proven innocent. Given this whole theory is virtually a science free zone there is no hope that that will ever change given the taxpayer Trillions its now worth per annum for those promoting it.

We were all told as far back as 1988 by James Hansen that the 'debate was over' on AGW (Do you remember any debate because I certainly don't ?) We were presented with a fait accompli so pay up prolls ..... ker ching !

It is hardly a coincidence that the following year the Wall fell communism failed and the UN made its first declaration of 'clock is ticking' climate doom . The usual suspects then happily swapped their red flag for a green one and the rest (or is it the West?) is history

I suspect there are some in Governments that feel a need to have an Emmanuel Goldstein to hate,
and an Eurasia to fear (1984)!