• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California Democrats Work To Legalize Discrimination After Voters Rejected It Twice

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
33,560
Reaction score
12,212
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
So there is always a work around when the voice of the people must be muzzled.

The voters have rejected this 2 times already.

Going for the hat trick?

=============================

Less Discrimination, More Success​

Democrats predicted that Prop 209 would have detrimental effects on the minorities in the state. They thought that without racial preference in college admissions, minority students’ enrollment at the University of California (UC) system would drop significantly.

The Democrats’ fearmongering didn’t come true. Research by Charles L. Geshekter, an emeritus professor of history at California State University-Chico, shows that since Prop 209’s passage, minority students’ enrollment in the UC system has increased, and their graduation rates have also improved. Geshekter credited the ban on racial preferences in college admissions with leading to a redistribution of minority students among UC campuses. More of them achieved better academic outcomes when they attended a college that “offered an apparently better match for their academic backgrounds and preparation.”

Even the Los Angeles Times had to admit that UC’s student body is more racially diversetoday. For example, UC’s 2020 freshman class was composed of 36 percent Hispanics, 35 percent Asians, 5 percent blacks, and 21 percent whites. Additionally, “about 44% of admitted students were low-income, while 45% were the first in their families to attend a four-year university.”

 
So there is always a work around when the voice of the people must be muzzled.

The voters have rejected this 2 times already.

Going for the hat trick?

=============================



California is deeply in debt and looking to institute a "rich people" tax. We moved from there because it is crazy left now. It is like a third-world country in Los Angeles, and San Francisco and Oakland, once thriving cities.
 
California is deeply in debt and looking to institute a "rich people" tax. We moved from there because it is crazy left now. It is like a third-world country in Los Angeles, and San Francisco and Oakland, once thriving cities.
Sure is. I left there in 2016 after 37 years.

Amazing how fast the liberal progs screwed up the state.
 
Sure is. I left there in 2016 after 37 years.

Amazing how fast the liberal progs screwed up the state.
Yes, it is. And as we see in Kalifornia, once they gain power, they just will not relinquish it. Like the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and now the military, they stock the agencies with DEI hires who couldn't otherwise get a job flipping burgers at Wendy's and who are. therefore, beholding to the government to keep their jobs, and why they are assured to vote Democrat no matter what. This is what socialists and far-left Democrats need which is a dependent populace and a dependent workforce.

People make these ultra phony claims that "immigrants" (never use the word ILLEGAL) are a net benefit to America and will trot out some study from the SLPC, ACLU, PBS, or far-left organization that cherry picks data and excludes reams of expenses that are off the books. Things such as schooling for their children, free school lunches, free medical, dental, and vision for their children, the cost of police, social workers, public defenders, jails, and in California now MEDICARE for all.
 
Sure is. I left there in 2016 after 37 years.

Amazing how fast the liberal progs screwed up the state.
I left California, where I was born and raised, in 1991 for Alaska after they passed the unconstitutional Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989. I also brought all of my now illegally banned firearms with me.
 
Back
Top Bottom