• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Air Strike NK, Yeay or Nay?

calamity

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,849
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
I'm in.

I figure if we're stuck with the Trump, he may as well do something useful and go where no Democrat would have the balls to go--bomb the **** out of Pyongyang. It's all they have, really. One city. Blow it to bits, and that country is a giant Gimp.
 
Definitely a big "no" for me.
 
I've got to bookmark.this thread incase we actually do bomb NK. It may help stop the endless whine fest of posts you historically create around anything Trump does.


No we should not Bomb NK Things may escalate to the point we need to take action but we ain't there yet so let's not start another war for ****s and giggles
 
calamity said:
I'm in.

I figure if we're stuck with the Trump, he may as well do something useful and go where no Democrat would have the balls to go--bomb the **** out of Pyongyang. It's all they have, really. One city. Blow it to bits, and that country is a giant Gimp.
Click to expand...

Why are you so hateful and violent?
 
calamity said:
I'm in.

I figure if we're stuck with the Trump, he may as well do something useful and go where no Democrat would have the balls to go--bomb the **** out of Pyongyang. It's all they have, really. One city. Blow it to bits, and that country is a giant Gimp.
Click to expand...

Sure, that would be typical for us. We sold them nuclear reactors from a company Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of 2 years before we claimed they were part of an "axis of evil". Starting a war with them now over a nuclear program is the kind of crap we do all over the planet. God bless the empire. We're becoming a lot like them, cannibalizing society for military might. And now we have a dear leader whose ass must be kissed.
 
I would bomb them with pictures of Kathy Griffin without makeup.
 
Fenton Lum said:
Sure, that would be typical for us. We sold them nuclear reactors from a company Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of 2 years before we claimed they were part of an "axis of evil". Starting a war with them now over a nuclear program is the kind of crap we do all over the planet. God bless the empire. We're becoming a lot like them, cannibalizing society for military might. And now we have a dear leader whose ass must be kissed.
Click to expand...

You have to admit, though, NK has been a pain in the ass for a while now. Trump can probably match their level of crazy. I am confident of that.

Sucks to be living in SK though.
 
calamity said:
You have to admit, though, NK has been a pain in the ass for a while now. Trump can probably match their level of crazy. I am confident of that.

Sucks to be living in SK though.
Click to expand...

Can't argue with that at all. I just think it would be better if they wrestled in jello, they can get as crazy as they want, proceeds could go to 21st century healthcare in america.
 
Ah the ramp up to war again, when everyone unites and the media cheers up the consent.
 
Fenton Lum said:
Ah the ramp up to war again, when everyone unites and the media cheers up the consent.
Click to expand...

you would have said the same thing about Germany in 1941

thank god not enough of your types around back then
 
Grand Mal said:
Population of Pyongyang- 3,255,388.
I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a good night's work. Kill one of ours, and we will kill 3.25 million of yours.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Why should North Korea get a pass?
Click to expand...

Why did we sell them nuclear reactors 2 years before they were on an "axis of evil" list? Schizophrenic if ya ask me. Go on, go to war all over the planet, I'm all for it, endless war for profit forever. This system needs a reset and I welcome over extension and over expansion. Just saying, america is insane.
 
Fenton Lum said:
Why did we sell them nuclear reactors 2 years before they were on an "axis of evil" list? Schizophrenic if ya ask me. Go on, go to war all over the planet, I'm all for it, endless war for profit forever. this system needs a reset and I welcome over extention and over expansion. Just saying, america is insane.
Click to expand...

Gee bud, maybe because we listened to people like you when you whined about how "meanly" we were traveling North Korea.

Takes one to know one wouldn't it buddy.
 
Fenton Lum said:
Why did we sell them nuclear reactors 2 years before they were on an "axis of evil" list? Schizophrenic if ya ask me. Go on, go to war all over the planet, I'm all for it, endless war for profit forever. This system needs a reset and I welcome over extension and over expansion. Just saying, america is insane.
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton Paved the Way for a Nuclear North Korea
Democratic president's 1994 dealmaking with Pyongyang started a process that led to ICBM capabilities

Bill Clinton Paved the Way for a Nuclear North Korea | LifeZette
 
an air strike on NK would be a disaster at best, so no, i don't support it.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Gee bud, maybe because we listened to people like you when you whined about how "meanly" we were traveling North Korea.

Takes one to know one wouldn't it buddy.
Click to expand...

Must have me confused with someone else. So how exactly do you meanly travel North Korea?
 
volsrock said:
How North Korea could kill 90 percent of Americans

How North Korea could kill 90 percent of Americans | TheHill
Click to expand...

It's even simpler than that. Picture this...

containers.webp

That's the port of Long Beach. Imagine a North Korean nuke in one of those containers, and more in other ports around the US.
And the thing is, South Korea is an ally and China needs to be tip-toed around, so nuclear retaliation is pretty much off the table.
See, the thing about the nuclear standoff is it requires each side to respect the principle of MAD. Sure, the US could reduce North Korea to a liveless desolation, at a huge cost to a very densely populated corner of the world, but would an American president sacrifice tens of millions of Americans to make the point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom