• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pre-adamites decision

Elvira said:
The main definition according to who? Original manuscripts or hearsay/false doctrine?
Click to expand...

It's all a matter of context and interpretation.. and that is what gets argued.

There is also the matter that is has been proven that mankind is over 200,000 years old from a biological point of view.
 
RAMOSS said:
It's all a matter of context and interpretation.. and that is what gets argued.

There is also the matter that is has been proven that mankind is over 200,000 years old from a biological point of view.
Click to expand...

We're not talking about science, we're talking about original Hebrew and Greek...the word had a distinct, original meaning...
 
Elvira said:
We're not talking about science, we're talking about original Hebrew and Greek...the word had a distinct, original meaning...
Click to expand...

THe Greek means nothing. It is not relevant, and anything written in the Greek is null and void. The Hebrew can always been taken symbolically, and in Genesis, there is enough word plays to show it wasn't literal.
 
RAMOSS said:
THe Greek means nothing. It is not relevant, and anything written in the Greek is null and void. The Hebrew can always been taken symbolically, and in Genesis, there is enough word plays to show it wasn't literal.
Click to expand...

Ok, dodge the true meaning...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom