• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

a 'parable' by self.

crazyme

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
687
Reaction score
14
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
There was a certain vineyard. The Master of the vineyard sent in laborers to tend to the field. Some planted, others watered, God gave the increase. This went on from time to time. More laborers were sent in to tend to the Vineyard.

Upon one laboring journey, some laborers found something wrong with the field. It was producing wheat but it was not pure wheat. And upon looking at its roots, the laborer found other wrongful things which could have endangered the field in the future. The laborer found that the tares, which choked the wheat which was on head levels was also on the soil level, and some even within the soil. So the laborer took his findings to The Master.

What do you think The Master of the vineyard did?


He looked into the matter and lo and behold, the laborer was correct.


So the Master called in the laborer and said, 'tell me, how much do you owe My Master'? The laborer gave the amount and The Master said, 'Quickly, write half that amount and give it to Me'. And so the laborer did as instructed.


So I ask. Do you think that the Master was wroth for the laborer's lack of social skills upon finding the possible 'danger' to the field? I say, He was not wroth but exuberant as if finding a lost coin.


The laborer continued on his way and reentered into the Vineyard to do more 'work'... Upon him entering into a certain patch, he found a basket in between the wheat. He picked it up and within it was a baby boy. He was delightful to look upon. And so he began calling the baby boy, 'Moses'.

And so with the lost coin found and the baby boy given to The Master, life resumed with the tending to the field as 'usual' but with different 'seeds'. And some planted, and others watered and God gave the increase.


The wise stewards knew what this meant. It meant a different approach to spreading 'seed'. This time, they would require 'knowledge' in advance prior to any sowing.


As knowledge tendeth to life so too does lack of knowledge tend to destruction.


Several things were learned:

1. There is no need to sow seed(s) to a non existent 'being'.
2. There is need to sow True seeds.
 
Last edited:
So... who is Jesus?

(J)esus is Gentile. The Christ was/is not.


So since (J)esus is Gentile, I guess that would make His Father, (J)ehovah, Gentile also, right? But The LORD is not Gentile although Eternal.

As Eternal's Only Begotten Son was given to the (J)ews, what might His Name have been called? It must have been a 'Hebrew' name, I would assume.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom