Are Christians really obligated to vote properly?

Are Christians obligated to vote properly if their Church might be in the 501(c)(3) exemption clause?

Saints shall judge and rulers shall be ordained to keep and execute law against the wrong doers. Rulers have already demonstrated their ability to be against wrong in very stern and almost terror ways.

I think the Saints are being waited upon until they start doing their part, to judge.


What does a Saint or Saints do when and if they judge? Hand the judgement over to their Head, namely Christ (J)esus.

crazyme said:

Are Christians obligated to vote properly if their Church might be in the 501(c)(3) exemption clause?

Click to expand...

Before the Trump Administration, if a minister or Pastor stood up behind the pulpit in front of his or her congregation, to maybe encourage their congregation to vote the way of their preference, they would lose their tax-exempt status.

Trump, has torn that law up. Now ministers behind the pulpit standing in front of their congregation can give their opinion on candidates and whether or not they are aligned with their churches Christian belief. They will no longer lose their tax-exempt status if they do speak out from the pulpit. In the end however, every minister I know and every Christian I know, votes the way he or she wants to. Christian just seem better informed on what is happening as a result.

That's just one of dozens and dozens of things Trump has done in giving the power back to the people.

We're going to see when this FISA warrant application is released unredacted, and the subsequent three renewals, that they have been covered in corruption and abuse of power and leaking, that there are some higher-ups and very familiar names that are facing minimum 10-year prison sentences.

They are all Obama officials. When that information comes out we will all be shocked of the abuse of power. And it's frightening that the Democrats would rather slide that under the rug than to be transparent and talk about it.

Much like Dianne Feinstein. She's appalled at Judge Kavanaugh and selectively ‘timed’ the release of the allegation, yet when Juanita Broaddrick accused Bill Clinton of rape, her, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, were all complicit in covering up Bill Clinton throughout his career.

Durbin said that no matter when a sexual assault take's placed, we should stand up against the person who assaulted the victim.

Well Dick Durbin, Juanita Broaddrick would like to talk to you.

The Selective outrage is appalling. Dr. Ford will get her day in court as well she should, but this whole process is just a tired regurgitated act the left do time and time again, from Borque, to Clarence Thomas, to Admiral Ronny Jackson, now Kavanaugh the list just goes on and on.

It's a slap in the face of real victims of sexual assault.

Davey said:

Before the Trump Administration, if a minister or Pastor stood up behind the pulpit in front of his or her congregation, to maybe encourage their congregation to vote the way of their preference, they would lose their tax-exempt status.

Trump, has torn that law up. Now ministers behind the pulpit standing in front of their congregation can give their opinion on candidates and whether or not they are aligned with their churches Christian belief. They will no longer lose their tax-exempt status if they do speak out from the pulpit. In the end however, every minister I know and every Christian I know, votes the way he or she wants to. Christian just seem better informed on what is happening as a result.

That's just one of dozens and dozens of things Trump has done in giving the power back to the people.

We're going to see when this FISA warrant application is released unredacted, and the subsequent three renewals, that they have been covered in corruption and abuse of power and leaking, that there are some higher-ups and very familiar names that are facing minimum 10-year prison sentences.

They are all Obama officials. When that information comes out we will all be shocked of the abuse of power. And it's frightening that the Democrats would rather slide that under the rug than to be transparent and talk about it.

Much like Dianne Feinstein. She's appalled at Judge Kavanaugh and selectively ‘timed’ the release of the allegation, yet when Juanita Broaddrick accused Bill Clinton of rape, her, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, were all complicit in covering up Bill Clinton throughout his career.

Durbin said that no matter when a sexual assault take's placed, we should stand up against the person who assaulted the victim.

Well Dick Durbin, Juanita Broaddrick would like to talk to you.

The Selective outrage is appalling. Dr. Ford will get her day in court as well she should, but this whole process is just a tired regurgitated act the left do time and time again, from Borque, to Clarence Thomas, to Admiral Ronny Jackson, now Kavanaugh the list just goes on and on.

It's a slap in the face of real victims of sexual assault.

Click to expand...

President Trump annulled past President Mr. Johnson's passed Law? Could you provide the legal references showing the annulling of it, please?


Nonprofits are not allowed to urge their members to support or oppose legislation. They may participate in a small amount of lobbying, but lobbying activities may not exceed a certain amount of the organization’s total expenses.

Political campaign activity. A nonprofit organization may not financially support or endorse any political candidates verbally or in writing. They may not oppose candidates either. This rule applies to candidates at every level — local, state and federal.

Common 501(c)(3) Rules and Regulations | BoardEffect

Actually, a Christian's vote should be for God's kingdom, no one else...

crazyme said:

President Trump annulled past President Mr. Johnson's passed Law? Could you provide the legal references showing the annulling of it, please?


Nonprofits are not allowed to urge their members to support or oppose legislation. They may participate in a small amount of lobbying, but lobbying activities may not exceed a certain amount of the organization’s total expenses.

Political campaign activity. A nonprofit organization may not financially support or endorse any political candidates verbally or in writing. They may not oppose candidates either. This rule applies to candidates at every level — local, state and federal.

Common 501(c)(3) Rules and Regulations | BoardEffect

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Davey View Post
Before the Trump Administration, if a minister or Pastor stood up behind the pulpit in front of his or her congregation, to maybe encourage their congregation to vote the way of their preference, they would lose their tax-exempt status.

Trump, has torn that law up. Now ministers behind the pulpit standing in front of their congregation can give their opinion on candidates and whether or not they are aligned with their churches Christian belief. They will no longer lose their tax-exempt status if they do speak out from the pulpit. In the end however, every minister I know and every Christian I know, votes the way he or she wants to. Christian just seem better informed on what is happening as a result

-

You are beginning to scare me. If I knew that the Church I was attending was part of the tax exempt, and if I heard those 2 above mentioned requirements being broken, the Church would either be breaking Federal Law or they would know something about the tax exempt right that the congregation might not.


Nonprofits are not allowed to urge their members to support or oppose legislation. They may participate in a small amount of lobbying, but lobbying activities may not exceed a certain amount of the organization’s total expenses.

Political campaign activity. A nonprofit organization may not financially support or endorse any political candidates verbally or in writing. They may not oppose candidates either. This rule applies to candidates at every level — local, state and federal.


Each candidate has a certain 'legislation' they are behind, right? And each 'legislation' has their certain advocates, right?


'Vote for, etc etc... His/her legislation is about reducing taxes and reduced taxes is a good thing'.....kind of thing.


Those without knowledge might think Government is ahead of God but the Truth is that God walks faster than man.

How long would it take to travel 2 light years?

How long would it take to travel to the next Galaxy?


Remember that 1 day with The Lord is as a thousand years.

2 Peter 3:8


"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."


We are basically living in a certain 'day' of The Lord since creation.

If the Earth was around for 1 million years, we are living is His 1000th day or His 2.739th year. Not of Him Being, but the time He has spent since Earth was created, if the Earth has been for 1 million years.


10 billion years would be 10,000,000 days or 27,397.26 years.


What did life look like 10 billion years ago as opposed to 29,397.26 years ago?


29,397.26 years ago would have been 27379.26 B.C.

crazyme said:

How long would it take to travel 2 light years?

How long would it take to travel to the next Galaxy?


Remember that 1 day with The Lord is as a thousand years.

2 Peter 3:8


"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."


We are basically living in a certain 'day' of The Lord since creation.

If the Earth was around for 1 million years, we are living is His 1000th day or His 2.739th year. Not of Him Being, but the time He has spent since Earth was created, if the Earth has been for 1 million years.


10 billion years would be 10,000,000 days or 27,397.26 years.


What did life look like 10 billion years ago as opposed to 29,397.26 years ago?


29,397.26 years ago would have been 27379.26 B.C.

Click to expand...

What's the numbers if the earth is less than 10,000 years old?

What could life have been like 27379 years before Tiberias became Emperor of Rome in 14 A.D.?


Most likely non city structured dwellers? Can cities and their sites be around after 27379 years of Earth's elements and erosion?


Will today's steel bar be excavatable (in) 27379 years from now if left to natural elements?


Unless they had advanced technology they probably used natural products for building purposes. Such as dirt and water.


And from that came murder for monies and all manners of wickedness that the Earth sees today.

Charge an arm and a leg for a cup of coffee in some places.


The Earth which was once free has now become 'taxable'.


Why? It's called unplanned parenting.

Sex.

And sometimes, celebrated sex even in 'religious' celebrations.

United States

Free love began to coalesce into a movement in the mid to late 19th century. The term was coined by the Christian socialist writer John Humphrey Noyes, although he preferred to use the term 'complex marriage'. Noyes founded the Oneida Community in 1848, a utopian community that "[rejected] conventional marriage both as a form of legalism from which Christians should be free and as a selfish institution in which men exerted rights of ownership over women".


Elements of the free-love movement also had links to abolitionist movements, drawing parallels between slavery and "sexual slavery" (marriage), and forming alliances with black activists.

American feminist Victoria Woodhull (1838–1927), the first woman to run for presidency in the U.S. in 1872, was also called "the high priestess of free love". In 1871, Woodhull wrote: "Yes, I am a Free Lover. I have an inalienable, constitutional and natural right to love whom I may, to love as long or as short a period as I can; to change that love every day if I please, and with that right neither you nor any law you can frame have any right to interfere".

Free love - Wikipedia

And so, contraception was needed and became a multi billion d(o)liar business..

Contraception for men, in different sizes and brands. Some more stylish than others with assortment of colors and senses. For the women also.. Different makes and models made to fit the contour of the ladies' desires. For children, newly developed 'beginner's' contraceptives were created. Pills, hormones to accelerate or deccelerate the natural bodies' hormonal growths. Females were introduced with their own line of male condoms to be used similarly but differently. Post sexual contraceptions were also created known as the 'day after' contraception. Etc....


But still many ladies say that these are a lot more humane for the women than for them needing to self abort an unwanted fetus using a clothes hanger, prodded into the womb, to dig out and excavate the undesirable. True. It is much more humane to use contraception than needing to use a wire hanger to prevent unwanted births. So true.

The insatiable desire of the women to have such a high craving for intercourse is more strange than understanding how teens in their puberty are constantly 'on the go'.

Puberty hormones cause a stimuli to which the teen chooses to partake or do something different. These are hormonally induced. But for an adult who has stopped these large productions of 'hormones', what is causing their stimuli?


2 things that I would be able to 'vouch' for...

1. Excuses
2. The sress hormone, Cortisol


Note the increase of sexualities within 'stressful' places compared to 'non-stressful' places as well as to the age at which sexuality is first engaged in. In both stressful places/neighborhoods, etc compared to non stressful places/neighborhoods, etc...


Males have a tendency to begin their excretion of their reproductive enzyme at earlier ages in more stressful environments than their age counterparts in the non stressful environments.

[If you compare U.S teens to other Country teens, you might find huge differences in the comparison of age, frequency, etc]


The really misfortunate and sad part, though, is seeing how the capitalistic Countries are trying to promote such young ages and frequencies as 'the better, more acceptable/healthier' way.

crazyme said:

The insatiable desire of the women to have such a high craving for intercourse is more strange than understanding how teens in their puberty are constantly 'on the go'.

Puberty hormones cause a stimuli to which the teen chooses to partake or do something different. These are hormonally induced. But for an adult who has stopped these large productions of 'hormones', what is causing their stimuli?


2 things that I would be able to 'vouch' for...

1. Excuses
2. The sress hormone, Cortisol


Note the increase of sexualities within 'stressful' places compared to 'non-stressful' places as well as to the age at which sexuality is first engaged in. In both stressful places/neighborhoods, etc compared to non stressful places/neighborhoods, etc...


Males have a tendency to begin their excretion of their reproductive enzyme at earlier ages in more stressful environments than their age counterparts in the non stressful environments.

[If you compare U.S teens to other Country teens, you might find huge differences in the comparison of age, frequency, etc]


The really misfortunate and sad part, though, is seeing how the capitalistic Countries are trying to promote such young ages and frequencies as 'the better, more acceptable/healthier' way.

Click to expand...

Even to their own children.


The LORD is not pleased with His Inheritance standing idly by and even condoning and partaking of such things and false teachings. Even upon 'holy' grounds.


Not only do they know that 'holiness belongeth unto The LORD' but they even, at times, mock The Holy LORD when and while they are upon HIS holy grounds.

To these, the congregation should have learned to be equipped well enough to stand up and against these wiles.

Why do believers 'need' to attend a false teaching building?

I have seen the name of Harvard used misappropriately. False 'Harvards' claiming to be the 'real' Harvard. False, yet very expensive to be a part of.

You can receive a certificate with the name of Harvard upon it and it might very well deceive many persons, even important, notable ones but all they have is a piece of paper with a fake stamp of Harvard upon it to use as a 'bribe' to the unknowing. INCLUDING themselves who did not know the differences but purchased the costly 'fake' certificate.

Fake to the real Harvard but not fake to their OWN Harvard.


If man can be bold enough to claim a name to their own, what prevents man from doing the same to a different name to a different building? After all, non for profits are MORE tax exemptable than for profits, right?


501c3? You mean as in 'see 501 jeans' as in Levi Strauss & Co.?

Founder
Levi Strauss
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, U.S.
Number of locations
2,800 company-operated stores[2]
Area served
Worldwide
Key people
Chip Bergh (CEO);[3] Harmit Singh (CFO)[3]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi_Strauss_%26_Co.

Lyndon Baines Johnson, often referred to by his initials LBJ, was an American politician who served as the 36th President of the United States from 1963 to 1969.


Lyndon B. Johnson - Wikipedia


Levi Strauss & Co.

Founded
May 1, 1853; 165 years ago (as David Stern & Lewis Strauss)



Who or what came first?? 501's or Lyndon B. Johnson?

The Stonewall riots (also referred to as the Stonewall uprising or the Stonewall rebellion) were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations by members of the gay (LGBT) community[note 1] against a police raid that took place in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of Manhattan, New York City. They are widely considered to constitute the most important event leading to the gay liberation movement[2][3][4] and the modern fight for LGBT rights in the United States.[5][6]

Gay Americans in the 1950s and 1960s faced an anti-gay legal system.[note 2][7] Early homophile groups in the U.S. sought to prove that gay people could be assimilated into society, and they favored non-confrontational education for homosexuals and heterosexuals alike. The last years of the 1960s, however, were very contentious, as many social/political movements were active, including the civil rights movement, the counterculture of the 1960s, and the anti–Vietnam War movement. These influences, along with the liberal environment of Greenwich Village, served as catalysts for the Stonewall riots.

Very few establishments welcomed openly gay people in the 1950s and 1960s. Those that did were often bars, although bar owners and managers were rarely gay. At the time, the Stonewall Inn was owned by the Mafia.[8][9] It catered to an assortment of patrons and was known to be popular among the poorest and most marginalized people in the gay community:

Stonewall riots - Wikipedia

crazyme said:

Are Christians obligated to vote properly if their Church might be in the 501(c)(3) exemption clause?

Click to expand...

what?

what is vote properly?

as a christian im not "obligated" to vote in anyway or even at all

Early homophile groups in the U.S. sought to prove that gay people could be assimilated into society, and they favored non-confrontational education for homosexuals and heterosexuals alike.

--


Much of the current spread of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in China has been through intravenous drug use and prostitution. In China, the number of people affected by HIV has been estimated at between 430,000 and 1.5 million;[1] somewhere below or around 0.1% of the population.[2][3] According to a United Nations report in 2001, the main distributors of HIV were the sharing of needles among drug users and problems during blood donations.[5] In many rural areas of China during the 1990s, for example, faulty blood collection programs infected a large number of people with HIV.[5][6]

Transmission through sex has been rising exponentially, exposing which groups the UN report regards as the 21st century's most vulnerable: "widespread lack of knowledge and protective life skills, huge internal labour migration, underprivileged minority communities, relative poverty, youth, and gender inequity".[5] A serious outbreak in a country as large as China could significantly affect the economies of both China and the world as a whole. The underlying government response to HIV/AIDS is now that of preemptive intervention.

An official report published in February 2009 stated that in 2008, for the first time, HIV/AIDS was China's leading cause of death among infectious diseases.

An important part of HIV education is targeting behavior to reduce stigma towards people with HIV/AIDS. Stigma is well recognized as a major barrier to HIV control, because it prevents people from seeking services for testing and treatment, and discourages people from practicing safer behaviors.[47][107][108] To address this issue, senior political figures have been involved in anti-discrimination campaigns, and have publicly shown that HIV cannot be transmitted through casual contact.

The day before the 2004 World AIDS Day, President Hu Jintao and other senior government leaders visited patients living with HIV/AIDS and called for the elimination of bias against this group.

Many Chinese businesses have been reluctant to make voluntary commitments to non-discriminatory treatment of HIV-positive employees, often because they fear lawsuits and because they are unable to recoup the cost of HIV/AIDS related health care from company insurance policies.


The AIDS Regulations have made it illegal to discriminate against people living with HIV/AIDS and their families in terms of their rights to schooling, employment, health services, and participation in community activities.

HIV/AIDS in China - Wikipedia

An official report published in February 2009 stated that in 2008, for the first time, HIV/AIDS was China's leading cause of death among infectious diseases.

Public ignorance about AIDS is a major problem in China. A 2001 survey found 20 percent of people had never heard of the disease.

Nearly 7,000 people died from the disorder in the first nine months of 2008, a substantial increase—until three years prior to this, the total cumulative mortality was fewer than 8,000.


The total of ALL infectious diseases.


A classic example of watching children grow disobedient, defiant and dishonoring to their parents


Trying to reason with defiant, dishonoring youths is like trying to ask him or her to do housework or to begin earning monies for the home. It's possible but the youths need to want to be a value to their family and not a curse.

Trivia....

In The U.S, what was one of the very first defiant signs among youths in the late 70s?

Answer: Long hair on males.


Question: For what reason was long hair on males dishonoring?

Answer: Lack of potential bread earning; getting a job.


Question: After long hair on males continued to wage self rights what came next?

Answer: Visible tattoos.



Question: Why were visible tattoos considered 'immoral'?

Answer: See answer to first.



Trivia:....

In The 70s, what T.V commercial had its first appearance of woman's rights and defiance?

Answer: Jordache Jeans with the lady with 'shorn' hair.


Question: From Jordache for women, what came for men?

Answer: Wranglers.


What feature did both Jordache and Wrangler provide?

Contour fitting.

Wrangler

Formerly
Hudson Overall Company (1904–1947)

Wrangler (jeans) - Wikipedia

Jordache Enterprises, Inc.
Founded
1969 (incorporated 1978)

Jordache - Wikipedia

Joseph Nakash (born 1942) is an American businessman, real estate investor, and co-founder of Jordache Enterprises.

Nakash was born to a Syrian Jewish family in Tel-Aviv, Israel.[1] In 1962, he immigrated to New York City[1] where he worked as a stock boy and saved enough money to bring his brothers Raphael (Ralph) and Abraham (Avi) to the United States in 1966.

Joseph Nakash - Wikipedia


Using profits from their apparel business, they diversified and started investing in banking and real estate primarily in New York, Miami, New Jersey and Israel.


Subsidiaries
Major subsidiaries:

Jordache clothing
Jordache real estate
Strip House (NYC and Las Vegas locations)
The Setai (hotel chain)
Prinir Agriculture
Port of Eilat (management)
Downeast Air
MG Aviation
Arkia Israel Airlines
Israeli Network (US operations)

Owner
Nakash family

Joseph Nakash
1942 (age 75–76)

crazyme said:

Are Christians obligated to vote properly if their Church might be in the 501(c)(3) exemption clause?

Click to expand...

The True Born Again Church Going Bible Reading Christians shall never vote because they've already voted for Jesus and God's rulership.
Therefore it does not matter whether their church get tax exemption or not