• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Video of OU's Mixon incident released

Saw this on ESPN's site earlier.

People were trying to make him the victim in the comments section.

Mixon could have walked away when things began to get heated.

But, he chose to stay.

tsk tsk!
 
RetiredUSN said:
Saw this on ESPN's site earlier.

People were trying to make him the victim in the comments section.

Mixon could have walked away when things began to get heated.

But, he chose to stay.

tsk tsk!
Click to expand...

Yes Mixon certainly wasn't a victim but neither was the girl, I think they should both learn a lesson from this.
 
the guy started to walk away when the woman said something to him and then initiated the physical contact
but did that guy not get raised by a father who explained to him that men do not EVER hit women
... stupid question. obviously not

now, what do younger boys watching sports center learn watching this
 
justabubba said:
the guy started to walk away when the woman said something to him and then initiated the physical contact
but did that guy not get raised by a father who explained to him that men do not EVER hit women
... stupid question. obviously not

now, what do younger boys watching sports center learn watching this
Click to expand...

Don't know what they might be learning from watching that. :shrug:

I do know what they are learning from the new Third-Wave Feminism movement; that such women don't want equality, they want a Matriarchy.

That in order to get in their pants you have to submit to a secondary role, allowing them to dominate and abuse you with impunity.

IMO it's as important to teach women never to strike a man as it is to teach a men never to hit a woman. That such actions have real world consequences.

After all, physically weaker men don't get a social pass if they initiate violence against a stronger man, so why should women? :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
Don't know what they might be learning from watching that. :shrug:

I do know what they are learning from the new Third-Wave Feminism movement; that such women don't want equality, they want a Matriarchy.

That in order to get in their pants you have to submit to a secondary role, allowing them to dominate and abuse you with impunity.

IMO it's as important to teach women never to strike a man as it is to teach a men never to hit a woman. That such actions have real world consequences.

After all, physically weaker men don't get a social pass if they initiate violence against a stronger man, so why should women? :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

i hope that is not what they learn, to believe that it is acceptable to hit a woman who initiates the physicality
 
justabubba said:
i hope that is not what they learn, to believe that it is acceptable to hit a woman who initiates the physicality
Click to expand...

Really? Why should a man be denied the right to self-defense simply because the aggressor is a woman?

ufc-women-fighters.jpg

or



There are hundreds of videos of females totally wrecking males because the guy is being a "gentleman" and not fighting back.

The female is not bound by any such restrictions. :roll:

Why should any woman think they can assault any man without facing immediate consequences?
 
Last edited:
justabubba said:
i hope that is not what they learn, to believe that it is acceptable to hit a woman who initiates the physicality
Click to expand...

So if Ronda Rousey started pushing you and hitting you, you would just take it because she is a woman?
 
Crovax said:
So if Ronda Rousey started pushing you and hitting you, you would just take it because she is a woman?
Click to expand...

Well, I sure as hell wouldn't try to hit her back. You never give Ronda Rousey your arm. Do you want to be arm barred? Because that is how you get arm barred. ;)
 
Captain Adverse said:
Really? Why should a man be denied the right to self-defense simply because the aggressor is a woman?

View attachment 67211284

or



There are hundreds of videos of females totally wrecking males because the guy is being a "gentleman" and not fighting back.

The female is not bound by any such restrictions. :roll:

Why should any woman think they can assault any man without facing immediate consequences?
Click to expand...


then you see nothing wrong with the guy hitting the woman in the OP's video
make your father proud
 
justabubba said:
then you see nothing wrong with the guy hitting the woman in the OP's video
make your father proud
Click to expand...

I see nothing wrong with a person striking back at another person if they are being attacked. The sex of the aggressor should be irrelevant.

It's just such social shaming which prevents men from defending themselves when the aggressor is a woman that leads to that 40% figure of domestic violence which occurs against men.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence

That figure of 40% may well be highly under-reported:

...[M]en are often more reluctant than women to report their abuse or seek help. One of the reasons for this is that IPV against men is generally less recognized by society than IPV against women. Additionally, heterosexual male victims of IPV are often judged harshly for "allowing" themselves to be beaten by a woman. This view is based upon the general rule that men are physically stronger than women, and, therefore, should be able to prevent any kind of female violence; a view which disregards that violent women tend to use objects during IPV at a higher rate than violent men.
Click to expand...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men

I would add to the quote above that just as with your chain of response in this thread, the assumption is ALL men are assumed physically stronger and more capable in a fight than ALL females and thus females should automatically get a pass when they initiate violence against a man regardless of their actual capabilities.

Violent women have been indoctrinated in a belief of absolute immunity from male reprisal as a direct result of this socialization "men should never strike a woman" regardless of the cause.

I am my own man. My "father's" pride was a matter of his own concern. My pride a matter of mine. What actions I choose to take in self-defense when I am being assaulted is wholly up to me based on the circumstances at the time.

I can tell you that the sex of the aggressor will have very little to do with my threat assessment.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
I see nothing wrong with a person striking back at another person if they are being attacked. The sex of the aggressor should be irrelevant.

It's just such social shaming which prevents men from defending themselves when the aggressor is a woman that leads to that 40% figure of domestic violence which occurs against men.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men

I am my own man. My "father's" pride was a matter of his own concern. My pride a matter of mine. What actions I choose to take in self-defense when I am being assaulted is wholly up to me based on the circumstances at the time.

I can tell you that the sex of the aggressor will have very little to do with my threat assessment.
Click to expand...

like i said, make your dad proud
boast of your willingness to strike a woman
 
justabubba said:
like i said, make your dad proud
boast of your willingness to strike a woman
Click to expand...

Tsk Tsk. :naughty

Not a "boast," just an honest, factual response to a blatant stereotypical judgement couched in an emotional appeal on your part. :coffeepap:
 
justabubba said:
i hope that is not what they learn, to believe that it is acceptable to hit a woman who initiates the physicality
Click to expand...

Well, it is acceptable and entirely appropriate.

Sorry you don't believe in equality.
 
Video said he was charged with a misdemeanor and suspended from playing. What was her punishment for objectively starting a physical fight?

All he did was end one.
 
I remember when this happened. I thought for sure he would end up playing for the Criminoles.
 
Mia Molitor appears to have initiated the physical part of the altercation. She reportedly stated Joe Mixon verbally provoked her. I think Joe responded disproportionately. Both Mia and Joe paid a price for their behavior.
During the 1999-2000 School Year, I had already retired and opted to substitute teach part time in a public school system. While teaching in a Special Needs Middle School classroom, a fight broke out in front of me between a girl and boy. The boy would not heed my command to stop. The girl attempted to disengage. I spun the boy around and restrained him with a bare naked choke. As a former redneck Tavern owner, I have ample hands on experience with breaking up fights. In the school fight situation I could not please everyone involved. I assume some of the special needs students deemed my act inappropriate. The responsibility to break up the fight rested solely with me. The principal had me write up an Incident Report. I kept in mind that performing work and unpleasantness sometimes go hand in hand.
 
JayDubya said:
Video said he was charged with a misdemeanor and suspended from playing. What was her punishment for objectively starting a physical fight?

All he did was end one.
Click to expand...

No, she was a bitch, and he was a was a coward acting tough.

He could have walked away before it escalated.

Tough chit for the both of them.
 
Crovax said:
Joe Mixon's lawyers release video of Oklahoma Sooners RB punching female in 2014

Hard to argue that she didn't have it coming, she started the physical altrication by shoving him and punching him in the face. Welcome to the land of equality ladies, don't pick a fight you can't win
Click to expand...

Drunk women sometimes do some stupid ****. She clearly brought this on herself. But, busting her jaw was probably taking it a little too far. Kind of like bringing a Glock to a spitball fight.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Really? Why should a man be denied the right to self-defense simply because the aggressor is a woman?

View attachment 67211284

or



There are hundreds of videos of females totally wrecking males because the guy is being a "gentleman" and not fighting back.

The female is not bound by any such restrictions. :roll:

Why should any woman think they can assault any man without facing immediate consequences?
Click to expand...


There is a such think as meeting force with equal an opposite force. Football player dude could have just shoved her away. Cracking her in the face was way over the top. But, I agree, she probably should have at least considered the possibility that this is exactly what may happen.

I stopped getting into physical confrontations back in the 80's when a friend of mine got kicked in the throat and died because his underwhelming amount of force was met by an overwhelming opposing force. THe kicker was charged with manslaughter, btw, served 2 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom