- Joined
- Dec 5, 2015
- Messages
- 28,575
- Reaction score
- 6,362
- Location
- Washington
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Those numbers don't make him the best quarterback. Those numbers only mean he was a very good quarterback who was on the most successful team...and that their cheater-in-chief coach was the best coach (meaning, he was wearing enough teflon that even when he got caught, he got away with it).
I like to use the 2001 Seattle Mariners as an example. They didn't win the World Series, but they did tie the all-time record for wins in a season. They didn't have any big sluggers on their team. They still had Ichiro, but Ken Griffey Jr. wasn't there anymore. They didn't have any ace pitchers. But what they did have was teamwork, and their coach Tommy Lasorda. YES, that's baseball and not football, but the same principle applies. Heck, watch "Moneyball" sometime - that adds a wholly different dimension to the story.
So...great seasons and championships don't happen because of a single great player. They happen because the coach AND the management was great.
Personally, when it comes to great quarterbacks, I'd more likely vote for either Montana, Namath, or - most likely - Bart Starr.
Many contrarians believe the QB is a product of the system in New England.
I can sure you the Patriots lose if Jimmy G is starting. Brady willed the Patriots victory. It was a sight to be seen. Greatness defined.