• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2016 NBA: Spurs, Warriors, Clips, Cavs, Hawks....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anagram said:
That doesn't seem true. More champions have decreased their win total than increased the last 15 years. And yeah there have been some repeats, but I don't see anything to suggest that most of them were any better, just good at keeping the core together.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily better, but usually good enough to make the conference final. I think the Cavs will be better though because of what I wrote after you grabbed the post.

I'll C&P that paragraph:

But, in Cleveland's case there are several tangibles. Kyrie will be more confident of his roll and the team will better use his unique skills alongside James. Love will also fit in better now. Their coach will have a full year to mold this team. James will have no pressure on him and probably give us his best performance to date as a result.
 
calamity said:
But, in Cleveland's case there are several tangibles. Kyrie will be more confident of his roll and the team will better use his unique skills alongside James. Love will also fit in better now. Their coach will have a full year to mold this team. James will have no pressure on him and probably give us his best performance to date as a result.
Click to expand...

I don't see why Love would suddenly fit in better. And I really see no reason why James would suddenly have his best season at 32.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom