• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump attacks 'filthy' Red Hen, the Virginia restaurant that asked Sarah Sanders to leave

So you are unable to follow also. Figures.

Let me help you follow since it doesn't appear you can.


Your current reply is stupid given the exchange and is as irrelevant as your first dumb question.


You were asked how your question was relevant, especially given the things you do not know. You failed to answer and instead deflected with dishonesty about excuses and butthurtness.

So in reply I point out that besides your (first) irrelevant question, you double down with more dishonesty (claim of butthurtness and additional question).


You have yet to make a valid reply.

If the place is filthy and terrible, why did she want to eat there? Apparently she wanted to very badly since she's had to get the President involved in her quest to do so.
 
You're just sore because what you thought was a cudgel to beat back gays has been reversed.
iLOL Wut?
Clearly you are engaged in make believe. Figures.

If the place is filthy and terrible, why did she want to eat there? Apparently she wanted to very badly since she's had to get the President involved in her quest to do so.
Apparently you do not pay attention.
Again.
How is that even a relevant question?

1. You do not know who chose the restaurant.
2. And if it occurred at night why would you think they would notice the exterior filth?
Apparently you just maker up things to believe.


As we have already been through this; Also again.
Your current reply is stupid given the exchange and is as irrelevant as your first dumb question.


You were asked how your question was relevant, especially given the things you do not know. You failed to answer and instead deflected with dishonesty about excuses and butthurtness.

So in reply I point out that besides your (first) irrelevant question, you double down with more dishonesty (claim of butthurtness and additional question).


You have yet to make a valid reply.


But then you get mad when nobody else answers questions. Typical leftist...
iLOL No.

But as usual, you make things up to believe.
A perfect example that this reply of yours is you making something up to believe can be seen above in my quote of me.
I did not get mad for you not answering how you thought your question was relevant. So stop making things up to believe.
 
Not sure whether the restaurant has reopened yet, but I have read that it's fully booked in advance. So no worries for the Red Hen.
 
Because Huckabee cannot even afford a slice of the Dons favorite chocolate cake at his FL rat hole on her salary.

Wrong again!! Deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders earns $165,000 a year. She could buy all the cake she wanted.
 
Not sure whether the restaurant has reopened yet, but I have read that it's fully booked in advance. So no worries for the Red Hen.

They opened this weekend and they were booked full.
 
Back
Top Bottom