• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where is Roy Moore?

Oborosen said:
So, making completely objective and incorrect statements about someone's own standing on an issue and then running away stating how the issue is somehow done with. Is the new flavor of how debate is done these days?

When did the debate devolve into some sort of schoolyard game?
Click to expand...

Evidence was discussed, if you can't accept that evidence or refuse to discuss it, I'm not really certain what you even think would be accomplished by debating someone. If two people can't even agree on the basic facts (e.g. there were managers at public mall's who had to ban Roy Moore because he was hitting on underage women), there is nowhere to go in conversation.

But more over, it requires both parties to actually care enough to debate the issues. Roy Moore was accused of being a child predator with ample evidence to back up that claim. Roy Moore lost because he was the worst candidate since Hillary Clinton to run for Federal office and --it's astounding that I can make this point-- he was orders of magnitude more unelectable than Hillary Clinton. Besides having the reputation of a child predator, he was a racist, xenophobic bigot who actually said the last time the US was great was when there was slavery. I mean, the guy was an electable clown. Alabama was one of the most right-wing places in the country (well, at least in terms of older generations), and he lost to a pro-life Democrat. The reason I don't want to waste breathe on this useless sack of **** is that he doesn't merit further discussion, unless people in Alabama want to try him for sexual assault of minors. But short of that, I have nothing left to say on this matter, and no interest in saying anything further even if I did.
 
MSgt said:
From the guy who victimizes Nazi wannabes and hides his defense for Roy Moore under an obtuse shell? I don't think a person like you gets to declare "stupidity" elsewhere.
Click to expand...

I do especially when I see it, though that never stops people like you from standing on top of your skeletal high horse and stabbing down at people you think are beneath you.

So does that still make the both of us assholes?
 
FieldTheorist said:
Evidence was discussed, if you can't accept that evidence or refuse to discuss it, I'm not really certain what you even think would be accomplished by debating someone. If two people can't even agree on the basic facts (e.g. there were managers at public mall's who had to ban Roy Moore because he was hitting on underage women), there is nowhere to go in conversation.

But more over, it requires both parties to actually care enough to debate the issues. Roy Moore was accused of being a child predator with ample evidence to back up that claim. Roy Moore lost because he was the worst candidate since Hillary Clinton to run for Federal office and --it's astounding that I can make this point-- he was orders of magnitude more unelectable than Hillary Clinton. Besides having the reputation of a child predator, he was a racist, xenophobic bigot who actually said the last time the US was great was when there was slavery. I mean, the guy was an electable clown. Alabama was one of the most right-wing places in the country (well, at least in terms of older generations), and he lost to a pro-life Democrat. The reason I don't want to waste breathe on this useless sack of **** is that he doesn't merit further discussion, unless people in Alabama want to try him for sexual assault of minors. But short of that, I have nothing left to say on this matter, and no interest in saying anything further even if I did.
Click to expand...

So you are capable of honest debate... color me surprised.

First of all, yes. He was a rather horrible candidate, seeing as his necessary handing to religious dogma was one of his most defining and damning aspects. He might have been racist, though I have never seen any hard evidence to the contrary. That whole America was great back when issue is painted as because its easy to do so. Though I am a tad more literate then people take me for and can actually read things for myself.

He stated that as how families were more close knitted and together in that era then they are now and he even speaks of slavery in a negative during that whole issue. So for people calling him racist and wanting to bring back the somehow "good ol" days of slavery are just children looking get a leg up on people, who somehow lack the investment to actually read these days.

The mall ban was stupid to begin with, even before they could not supply proof. I live here and malls keep information on individuals who were banned for quite a long time. Had there been an actual paper trail then the issue would have been settled. For all we know they could have gotten that story together before being asked by the media, so once again. No proof destroys their own narrative.

"lets postulate here"
Seeing as just being called a molester, without evidence to back it besides someone's own words. Still makes that individual a molester.

Would your tune still stay the same, if someone came out and accused you of the same without just as little evidence to back it up?
 
Where is Roy Moore?

Did you try the local roller rink, or girl scouts meeting?
 
I have it on good authority that Moore is down at the local free clinic hitting on 14 year olds ...........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom