• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where is Roy Moore?

Days before the election Doug Jones is holding get out the vote rallies almost everywhere. Roy Moore is nowhere to be found.



Moore Absent on the Alabama Senate Campaign Trail

What a coward.
What the heck?
Because he isn't out campaigning the weekend prior to the election somehow that equates to being a coward? He and his wife and friends went to the Army Navy football game. He had a big rally tonight from what I read so what's the problem.
 
What the heck?
Because he isn't out campaigning the weekend prior to the election somehow that equates to being a coward? He and his wife and friends went to the Army Navy football game. He had a big rally tonight from what I read so what's the problem.

Yeah, we also found out they like Jews and even have one as a lawyer.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
Days before the election Doug Jones is holding get out the vote rallies almost everywhere. Roy Moore is nowhere to be found.



Moore Absent on the Alabama Senate Campaign Trail

What a coward.


I think we can expect a lot of those red hat Jesus followers to show up for Moore. Donald Trump and Steve Bannon have endorsed him.




th
 
Last edited:
Have they looked in Mrs. Goodloves Home for Wayward Girls?

They did yesterday.
Bill Clinton, Cosby and Weinstein are using them to hold meetings.

Though they did book them through the next two months, so that's weird.
 
Yeah that's right, wanting to spite someone you've never met is a totally valid reason to elect a known pedophile to national office for the first time in American history.

Citation needed
 
Of course you do, you support a politician like Moore sexually assaulting underage teens.

Like all the other yapping posters, a citation would be nice.
 
You have to hand it to them, Republicans told us they weren't bigoted and were open-minded. I guess they weren't lying, it's just that they draw the line for gays and trans. But pedophiles... You know, that's not worse than being a liberal.

With the current iteration of liberalism. I am remised to say that there are few things worse then them swirling in any cesspool now.
 
That's better than being an anti-Semite.
Yeah, that certainly made American Jews feel right at home with Moore.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
With the current iteration of liberalism. I am remised to say that there are few things worse then them swirling in any cesspool now.

Roy Moore lost, I don't care to waste anymore breathe on the issue. But if you can't believe the literal scores of people who have told stories about him trying to force himself onto underage girls, stores that had to ban him, cops who had to be told to keep him away from cheerleaders, the fact that the guy asked a 16 year old's mother if he could date her, and so on and so on.

If you want to believe that all of these people are lying because you want to live in a hyperpartisan fantasy where Republicans didn't try to nominate a pedophile to national office, go for it, or if you want to try to justify this choice because liberuhls are the worst, then again, go for it. Lose again.

But as I said, I don't really intend to waste a second further on this cretin, so go ahead and defend him on this thread. I don't give a rat's ass anymore.
 
Where is Roy Moore?

Cruising the mall?
 
Turns out he was learning how to ride a horse.
 
Roy Moore lost, I don't care to waste anymore breathe on the issue. But if you can't believe the literal scores of people who have told stories about him trying to force himself onto underage girls, stores that had to ban him, cops who had to be told to keep him away from cheerleaders, the fact that the guy asked a 16 year old's mother if he could date her, and so on and so on.

If you want to believe that all of these people are lying because you want to live in a hyperpartisan fantasy where Republicans didn't try to nominate a pedophile to national office, go for it, or if you want to try to justify this choice because liberuhls are the worst, then again, go for it. Lose again.

But as I said, I don't really intend to waste a second further on this cretin, so go ahead and defend him on this thread. I don't give a rat's ass anymore.

So, making completely objective and incorrect statements about someone's own standing on an issue and then running away stating how the issue is somehow done with. Is the new flavor of how debate is done these days?

When did the debate devolve into some sort of schoolyard game?
 
When did the debate devolve into some sort of schoolyard game?

Around the time one side decided that Obama's Birth Certificate and his "probable" foreign Islamic and "anti-Christ" origin was the base of American destruction, right up to the 2016 campaign trail when one side decided that even Adolph Hitler would have been a fine candidate to oppose Hillary Clinton. It's been a school yard game since 2008.
 
Around the time one side decided that Obama's Birth Certificate and his "probable" foreign Islamic and "anti-Christ" origin was the base of American destruction, right up to the 2016 campaign trail when one side decided that even Adolph Hitler would have been a fine candidate to oppose Hillary Clinton. It's been a school yard game since 2008.

Actually I was speaking about the debate on this forum, but seeing as you willingly sink yourself into such stupidity. It reveals more about you then I previously thought possible.
 
Actually I was speaking about the debate on this forum, but seeing as you willingly sink yourself into such stupidity. It reveals more about you then I previously thought possible.

From the guy who victimizes Nazi wannabes and hides his defense for Roy Moore under an obtuse shell? I don't think a person like you gets to declare "stupidity" elsewhere.
 
Yes Alabamians will make this call and the Senate will have to seat him if he wins but no doubt due to all the allegations and the atmosphere in Congress over sexual harassment cases he will be facing an ethics investigation most likely on day one. And if that is the case it is all good.

The ethics committee will hear testimony from both sides. Any evidence will be scrutinized especially their testimonies they gave to the media. Witnesses will be called in to give their testimony. Heck all parties involved may be ordered to take a lie detector test.

Another thing to consider is for Moore to go after his accusers full barrel the media may be inclined to play that as victim shaming.

I have been keeping abreast on these allegations. So far Leigh Corfman who claims Moore took her to his house in the country and touched her inappropriately on multiple occasions in her own words what she describe to WaPo does not wash with court documents on file at the courthouse.

Beverly Nelson is another figure that has some splaining to do. Nelson went before Judge Moore in a divorce hearing. Now if you had been sexually assaulted by the judge residing over your divorce would you allow him to continue or request another judge? Evidently Ms. Nelson didn't have a problem with Moore residing over her divorce trial a couple of decades back. She also in her tearful national presser with Gloria Alred presented a yearbook that Moore allegedly signed but just with shots the media were able to obtain when she showed the notation brought out a lot of questions of its authenticity. Because of that she claims now in a presser she now claims notations she added to the original autograph were to remind her when the autograph to place. And all the notations she added were things to support her story.

There is another accuser that claims unwanted sexual advances from Moore but it was discovered Moore put her brother away in prison for a good amount of time.

There is another accuser that claims unwanted sexual advances when she was a teen. But it turns out Moore was the judge that took her child from her and gave custody of him to the daughter's mother because the teen mother was deemed unfit.

So you see I welcome a very thorough investigation by the ethics committee. Where the accusers and the accused will be under the microscope.

You need some research. Nelson did not go before Moore in her divorce trial. Moore was merely substituting to sign off on her request to suspend divorce proceedings. Her judge was a different judge. This came out earlier. Get informed better.

Also, no the one who Moore took the child away from and gave to the grandmother was not a teen, but rather 22/23 when she said he harassed her (believe he slapped her ass).

The first girl is getting crap for the phone not being in her room, and an address that Moore and his flunkies claimed was a mile away (which would still be more than walkable). What the idiots seem to not realize is that phone cords (especially from the 70s) stretched, far. Could easily go into a girl's room. And she didn't live where they claimed but a police report shows she lived right near where she said they met up.
 
In Beverly Nelson's case Ms. Nelson in 1999 filed a divorce action against her then-husband, Mr. Harris. It was filed in Etowah County and the judge assigned was Roy S. Moore and the hearing had been set. She would have known at that time the judge assigned as it would have been placed on the court docket. There is no request from Nelson to have Moore recuse himself. Before the date of the trial Beverly Nelson which was Beverly Harris at the time dropped the divorce proceedings. She never went before Judge Moore.

The order of dismissal is on record at the Etowah County courthouse too. It is signed by Roy Moore. Next to his signature are the initials of his assistant at the time which were D.A.. The D.A. did not stand for District Atty. And that is how the signature appears in Beverly Nelson's yearbook with the initials D.A. after it. I believe this raises questions that further need investigated by a third party.

Another accuser the WaPo quoted turns out Roy Moore sent her brother to prison. And another accuser named was a teen mother that Judge Roy Moore at the time deemed her unfit and gave custody of her child to the teen's mother. There are court records on file that discredit part of Leigh Corfman's story, the one who claims she was 14 when Moore assaulted her. Like it or not these things do raise questions in regard to the allegations. And they need to be thoroughly investigated.

IF Moore wins he will be seated in the Senate but there are plenty of members on both sides of the aisle that will immediately call for an ethics investigation. Even the other sitting senator from Alabama Sen. Shelby (R) came out over the weekend and publicly stated he could not vote for Roy Moore. If Moore is innocent as he claims he will welcome such an investigation to clear his name. If the investigation proves he isn't then he will be removed from the Senate.

She had a different judge to begin with. That has been clarified quite well. The only paperwork Moore signed was the final one, and there is no reason to believe she even knew he would be involved or was signing that until after he did so.

https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/

Name the one that had a brother sent to prison. Please provide that person to verify she was one of the WaPo accusers. I saw an interview that basically showed that Moore's campaign was trying to just through that woman in there, adding an extra woman to try to discredit the rest.
 
Back
Top Bottom