• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Moore wins in landslide!

Things bode well for the turnout for Moore: next week in Alabama, it's supposed to dip into the teens.
 
Yep, that's pretty much how it goes. If you have a hundred women accusing a man of sexual assault and one of the accusers' stories has a hole in it, all the women are lying. Of course, I doubt somehow that Juanita Broaddrick testifying in an affidavit that Clinton didn't rape her had any impact on Republicans' willingness to believe the overall story. For the record, I myself did not use the argument that Broaddrick's contradictions delegitimized the other womens' accusations.
 
I don't think you understand what the word forgery means...

Forgery is trying to pass off your own writing as someone else's.

She's guilty of forgery.

Had she said from the beginning that she wrote part of it -- that would have been one thing -- but she attempted to deceive and now, her entire accusation is tainted.
 
Yep, that's pretty much how it goes. If you have a hundred women accusing a man of sexual assault and one of the accusers' stories has a hole in it, all the women are lying. Of course, I doubt somehow that Juanita Broaddrick testifying in an affidavit that Clinton didn't rape her had any impact on Republicans' willingness to believe the overall story. For the record, I myself did not use the argument that Broaddrick's contradictions delegitimized the other womens' accusations.

And now we have Moore not only saying that America was last great when black people could be owned and bought/sold as property, but that 'maybe Putin was right'.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/12/08/roy-moore-slams-america-maybe-putin-is-right/23301524/
 
Forgery is trying to pass off your own writing as someone else's.

She's guilty of forgery.

Had she said from the beginning that she wrote part of it -- that would have been one thing -- but she attempted to deceive and now, her entire accusation is tainted.

Just out of curiosity, did she claim it was his handwriting -- that he wrote all of it?
 
I don't understand.... you said "Moore wins in landslide!" .... but the voting happens on dec 12th. It's the 8th. Are you .... The Doctor? Come with a warning, trying to avert disaster?!?

It was a ‘tip of the hat’ to our not so recent history. Sorry history is an interest of mine......

View attachment 67225823
 
Just out of curiosity, did she claim it was his handwriting -- that he wrote all of it?

I don't know that she used those exact words, but she pointed to it and said he wrote it. The subject of handwriting analysis on the "7s" has been a topic for a few weeks but she didn't mention, until now that those were her "notes." My guess is that she was getting backed in a corner with her lie and had to come out now to keep from being prosecuted.
 
I don't know that she used those exact words, but she pointed to it and said he wrote it. The subject of handwriting analysis on the "7s" has been a topic for a few weeks but she didn't mention, until now that those were her "notes." My guess is that she was getting backed in a corner with her lie and had to come out now to keep from being prosecuted.

Okay, well, if she never claimed he wrote it, then it's not forgery. It would also be kind of a weird "forgery" to write the notes in a completely different handwriting, one which never even attempted to write in cursive. You're jumping the gun on the "forgery" claim.
 
He signed the book! Who cares what she added to it?

There is only so far I can ‘lead the horse to water’, you’re going to need someone other than me to ‘splain it to you. If she wasn’t concerned, there would be no “clarification.” One thing changes the whole. You sign a check and let me ‘add’ some zeros to it, deal?
 
He signed the book! Who cares what she added to it?
It's tainted evidence.

This is my problem with modern feminism despite my liberalism. Whether Moore is guilty (he is) is irrelevant to the fact that this accuser appears to be a fraud, riding on the backs of legitimate and credible testimony.

I despise Moore and his ilk, but we can't led forgery slide. This kind of method could be just as easily used on an innocent man as it could Moore, which is unacceptable.

Protecting innocent men (not talking about Moore) is as important as protecting sincere female victims.
 
There is only so far I can ‘lead the horse to water’, you’re going to need someone other than me to ‘splain it to you. If she wasn’t concerned, there would be no “clarification.” One thing changes the whole. You sign a check and let me ‘add’ some zeros to it, deal?

Did she actually claim he wrote the whole note? I seem to recall the signature being a problem, which it is. A creepy problem.
 
Things bode well for the turnout for Moore: next week in Alabama, it's supposed to dip into the teens.

laughing.gif
 
There is only so far I can ‘lead the horse to water’, you’re going to need someone other than me to ‘splain it to you. If she wasn’t concerned, there would be no “clarification.” One thing changes the whole. You sign a check and let me ‘add’ some zeros to it, deal?

Funny how clarifying is considered forgery to you. What about the tax bill with it's unreadable hand-written changes? Is that just as bad in your mind?

Of course it isn't.
 
It's tainted evidence.

This is my problem with modern feminism despite my liberalism. Whether Moore is guilty (he is) is irrelevant to the fact that this accuser appears to be a fraud, riding on the backs of legitimate and credible testimony.

I despise Moore and his ilk, but we can't led forgery slide. This kind of method could be just as easily used on an innocent man as it could Moore, which is unacceptable.

Protecting innocent men (not talking about Moore) is as important as protecting sincere female victims.



Thank you! I was hoping the poster could reach the conclusion with minimal assistance, best laid plans.......
 
Back
Top Bottom