• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tomi Lahren is an angry spinster who was hurt by feminism

I believe faithful execution of our own at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation can help with this situation as well under our form of capitalism.

Women should be freer in their relationship needs and goals.
 
Not defending the O/P but any criticism coming forth from the left, most who literally bathe in the left’s crap news of the day, is highly amusing.
 
TurtleDude said:
what is interesting is that several of the "hot" GOP spokes babes have had
"issues" in relationships. Laura Ingraham (once engaged to Dinesh D'Souza), Ann Coulter (a whole litany of ex's) and now this woman. Of course the leftwing talking heads are in no position to gloat.
Click to expand...

I think in the case of Ingraham and Coulter they came to prominence at a time when feminism was on the rise.

While Tomi was an exception, younger conservative women like Lauren Chen and Brittany Pettibone (now Sellner) seem to be more able to get into good relationships.

The truth is though, it’s harder for a career woman to maintain a healthy relationship without making career sacrifices.

Ann Coulter could simply never switch from being a bombastic far right crap disturber to being a good mother.

People hate it when this is brought up because some feminist tenets are so uncritically accepted in society, but being a successful career woman and a good mother and good wife are hard to accomplish. My mother makes more then my father and has a better career and they’re still married, but that’s a rare thing.
 
trixare4kids said:
Not defending the O/P but any criticism coming forth from the left, most who literally bathe in the left’s crap news of the day, is highly amusing.
Click to expand...


You don’t need to defend me. I’m curious though as to what you think I’m wrong about though.
 
trixare4kids said:
Not defending the O/P but any criticism coming forth from the left, most who literally bathe in the left’s crap news of the day, is highly amusing.
Click to expand...

lol. Why do women seem braver when Gold is involved under our form of Capitalism? It makes it seem like "true love for free" is worth-less under Capitalism.
 
lurchadams said:
How much does it bother you when women feel empowered to share their views?
Click to expand...

Women sharing their views doesn’t bother me at all.

However if you share views that I think are incorrect I may choose to comment on them.

My girlfriend always shares her views with me and I have been convinced when she has a good argument.

I’m not a Saudi prince dressing my lady in a trash bag and ignoring everything she says. I don’t think anyone should be denied their speech rights on sex, it’s not threatening to me at all. The fact that this is your first go to though is very telling
 
Risky Thicket said:
Here's reality for you explained in a song. Sometimes if it is really good earth-shaking sex it works out this way. And it works both ways, women using men or men using women. When sex gets really good both people are at some level using each other and both are usually aware. Sometimes it's mutual using.

Too much good sex just ain't enough.

Click to expand...



One of Bill Withers top hits.

There is some definite truth in these lyrics.

I wanna spread the news
That if it feels this good getting used
Oh, you just keep on using me
Until you use me up
Until you use me up
Click to expand...
 
EMNofSeattle said:
I don’t care about her personal life, but since she chose to talk about it and make it public I wanted to talk about it.

I wouldn’t go out of the blue and criticize her every decision, when she chooses to claim men are all pigs and give reasons I think it is fair to discuss it
Click to expand...

Wow...is she high maintenance or what? It's all about "her" schedule, "her" wants, "her expectations". What man in his right mind would want to date someone who is incapable of treating her guy like a hero, but demanding that she be treated like a "I'm so busy" queen?

Mind you, I am sure 200 years ago this could be solved by switching her and then given a good ****ing...it was a tried and true method of calming everyday bitches. But can't do that anymore so best to run when you see someone like her.
 
Humanity is a ****ing disgrace to the Animal Kingdom.
 
maxparrish said:
Wow...is she high maintenance or what? It's all about "her" schedule, "her" wants, "her expectations". What man in his right mind would want to date someone who is incapable of treating her guy like a hero, but demanding that she be treated like a "I'm so busy" queen?

Mind you, I am sure 200 years ago this could be solved by switching her and then given a good ****ing...it was a tried and true method of calming everyday bitches. But can't do that anymore so best to run when you see someone like her.
Click to expand...

718de4_5b76a05cac7d413ebf03e4543ce90fe6~mv2.gif
 
She's a bit off putting but I get what she's saying.

It's a fact....intelligent, successful women have a problem finding mates. Men don't seem to want someone that is smarter or more successful than they are. As a result, a lot of women will forego or put off getting an education and successful career in order to find a mate...and some will even undermine or hide their own achievements in order to seem less smart or less successful than they really are. Whereas, men don't seem to have that problem per se.

I don't know what her beef with text messaging was all about but it seemed like she might've been thinking of someone specific rather than men in general.


Tomi is a lot more feminist than she cares to admit....maybe even too much so.
 
I have only seen Tomi Lauren in a couple of interviews. She seems a bit high strung. I didn't watch the video because frankly I just don't care what she thinks.
 
Monogamy politics will continue dividing men and women against each other until it is rejected and fought back against by other than just a tiny minority (mainly just single rights' activists and the highly underrepresented poly community).

And we have to stop letting incels and the MRA"redpillers" suck up all the oxygen on the topic, because they'll inevitably try to make it all about how much they hate women (some feminists are guilty of this too whether they admit it or not, especially white feminists)
 
Moot said:
She's a bit off putting but I get what she's saying.

It's a fact....intelligent, successful women have a problem finding mates. Men don't seem to want someone that is smarter or more successful than they are. As a result, a lot of women will forego or put off getting an education and successful career in order to find a mate...and some will even undermine or hide their own achievements in order to seem less smart or less successful than they really are. Whereas, men don't seem to have that problem per se.

I don't know what her beef with text messaging was all about but it seemed like she might've been thinking of someone specific rather than men in general.


Tomi is a lot more feminist than she cares to admit....maybe even too much so.
Click to expand...

Women want providers and men want loyalty.

The woman being higher career status is not conducive to this.

I would never a date a higher status woman than me. And let’s be honest, Lahren wouldn’t give me the time of day if I asked her on a date in my toolbelt and safety vest. That is a mutual thing,
But because men are intended by the laws of nature to provide then men have a much wider pool
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Women want providers and men want loyalty.

The woman being higher career status is not conducive to this.

I would never a date a higher status woman than me. And let’s be honest, Lahren wouldn’t give me the time of day if I asked her on a date in my toolbelt and safety vest. That is a mutual thing,
But because men are intended by the laws of nature to provide then men have a much wider pool
Click to expand...
 
~ Don't be jealous. Besides she is far too young to be a "spinster".
 
EMNofSeattle said:
I can tell you the last thing I value in a woman is her income and career, first off a successful career woman isn’t interested in me to start with because I’m in the blue collar class, but second off and I’ll just be blunt, I want a woman who supports MY career and not the other want around.
Click to expand...

Why am I not surprised. :roll:

EMNofSeattle said:
Why would I want to date a woman who is a career go getter and would just neglect family life or not want children?
Click to expand...

I don't know. And I really don't care. Personally, I wouldn't want to -- and thankfully never did -- date a conservative/religious guy who basically wants an unpaid housekeeper and non-stop baby breeder for a partner or wife. No thank you! I always thought it was better to be the "rich career lady" (meaning a woman who has enough money of her own that she doesn't need to marry if she doesn't want to) than the "poor peasant chick" who never had the chance of a better education and a well-paying career.

As to Tomi's rant, it's irrelevant to me. Maybe she's just looking in the wrong places if she really wants a man that badly.
 
maxparrish said:
Mind you, I am sure 200 years ago this could be solved by switching her and then given a good ****ing...it was a tried and true method of calming everyday bitches. But can't do that anymore so best to run when you see someone like her.
Click to expand...

And it's best for women to run when they see guys who "think" as you do.
 
vesper said:
I have only seen Tomi Lauren in a couple of interviews. She seems a bit high strung. I didn't watch the video because frankly I just don't care what she thinks.
Click to expand...
Just a bit. ;)

I think we can agree on this one, Vesper. Best is to ignore Tomi.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
You need to understand sexual market value, women desire resources and men desire sex.

There are women who will use you for sex... for a fee.

I do not recommend this
Click to expand...

Why does it seem women are "braver for Gold" under our form of Capitalism than for free? Women have no problem talking about sex when Gold is involved only for free. "Free women" seem to be more willing to use censorship "to try to control society" than "free speech for equality."
 
"Spinster"? What year is this?
 
Moot said:
Men don't seem to want someone that is smarter or more successful than they are. As a result, a lot of women will forego or put off getting an education and successful career in order to find a mate...and some will even undermine or hide their own achievements in order to seem less smart or less successful than they really are.
Click to expand...

Which is a HUGE mistake in my view. Getting a good education and a career or job that provides enough money for women to meet our basic needs (home, food, clothing, etc.) on our own is a lot better than foregoing those essential steps for a mate that many women may end up regretting later on. I'm glad I chose education, well-paying job, and financial freedom instead of the whole "traditional woman's" path.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom