wait so you didn't even look up the issue but still defaulted to complaining? If you can't put in the time to learn others' arguments, why should they learn yours?
Who and what is this in response to? Why wouldn't you quote who you're responding to?
If you can point out anything other than religion to objective same-sex marriage I would love to hear it.
Maybe I understand your argument perfectly, maybe that's why you didn't quote me.
How would I know you're not explaining.
All the information I can have is what I received from people. People say they object because it's unnatural, 2 with I point out a railroad is unnatural using a device to communicate to people in different places is unnatural.
So that argument is an appeal to nature which is a logical fallacy.
The other argument I hear is that it spreads disease. To wit I respond so does heterosexual sex. Further a person could just some behaviors to greatly decreased the risk of spreading diseases without changing their sexual orientation.
So that argument is mistaking correlation for causation.
You haven't presented it position I can't listen to what isn't presented. This is a forum for discussion of ideas so let's hear it.
as far as the CEO of Apple keeps being obtuse in certain ways. I don't think LGBT people in the US have faced anything like Jim Crow laws. I think he's trying to say he's more heroic than he really is.
So if you want to talk to somebody about your views I'm willing to listen but you have to respond to my post I have no idea who you were even responding to nobody but you.
My presence on this form and responding to you it's bothering to learn your argument.
Sounds like this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.