• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What's the Point of a Honeymoon In the Modern Era?

So you don't think it is a good ide for women to not date or marry guys that have a strong moral aversion to ever cheating on them or leaving them? Isn't that rather important to many women?

Sure. My question is: what makes you believe that only religion-driven guys have a moral aversion to cheating on or leaving women?
 
So you don't think it is a good ide for women to not date or marry guys that have a strong moral aversion to ever cheating on them or leaving them? Isn't that rather important to many women?

Forced monogamy is an outdated concept anyway. It does more harm than good.
 
So you don't think it is a good ide for women to not date or marry guys that have a strong moral aversion to ever cheating on them or leaving them? Isn't that rather important to many women?

Religious guys never cheat on or leave their wives? On planet Earth that happens a lot.
 

I would argue that a huge portion of those "religious people" who get divorced are not true Christians anyway.

But I know that others would denounce that as a "no true Scotsman" fallacy even though I believe it to be true. I don't believe a person who is a real Christian would be likely to abandon his/her marriage.
 
I would argue that a huge portion of those "religious people" who get divorced are not true Christians anyway.

But I know that others would denounce that as a "no true Scotsman" fallacy even though I believe it to be true. I don't believe a person who is a real Christian would be likely to abandon his/her marriage.

why would they denounce that as no true scotsman

i agree they are tons of fake christians
 
I would argue that a huge portion of those "religious people" who get divorced are not true Christians anyway.

But I know that others would denounce that as a "no true Scotsman" fallacy even though I believe it to be true. I don't believe a person who is a real Christian would be likely to abandon his/her marriage.

I would argue that the phrase “till death do us part” just reinforces how fake religion really is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Because an all knowing "God" who created us would know that people evolve over time, and two people who may have been compatible at one point may not be compatible in the future. Also a loving "God" would never expect two people to remain in a miserable marriage because of fear of repercussions from it.
 
Because an all knowing "God" who created us would know that people evolve over time, and two people who may have been compatible at one point may not be compatible in the future. Also a loving "God" would never expect two people to remain in a miserable marriage because of fear of repercussions from it.

Just because people evolve other time does not mean their marriage becomes "miserable". Americans and many westerners expect way too much of their marriages anyway.
 
Just because people evolve other time does not mean their marriage becomes "miserable". Americans and many westerners expect way too much of their marriages anyway.

So a spouse becomes mentally abusive and the other person needs to take it for the rest of their life because your god says divorce is a sin?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I would argue that a huge portion of those "religious people" who get divorced are not true Christians anyway.

But I know that others would denounce that as a "no true Scotsman" fallacy even though I believe it to be true. I don't believe a person who is a real Christian would be likely to abandon his/her marriage.

I denounce it!
 
I always thought the main purpose of a honeymoon was for a new married couple to spend time alone (hopefully) together and the main purpose being to consummate their marriage. I.E have sex for with each other for the first time.

But in the modern era, only 5% or so of married couples are virgins when they get married. So what is the point of a honeymoon anyway when the married couple may well have been having sex for months or even years beforehand anyway?

Party time dude. Loosen your corset.
 
Its a vacation after the stress of the marriage preparations and an time to get to know each other as a committed couple.

Why is virginity such a biog deal to conservatives like yourself? Do you think that having sex actually changes a women? Having sex as a virgin is a comedy of errors because you dont know what you are doing and have no confidence. What happens if you aren't sexually compatible, but you only determine this after you get married?

Really, they don't know what they are doing. I bet they figure it out just fine.
 
I've been to two or three parties in my lifetime. If you count birthday parties. Went a a fraternity rush party once.

That rock and roll lifestyle!
 
I would argue that a huge portion of those "religious people" who get divorced are not true Christians anyway.

But I know that others would denounce that as a "no true Scotsman" fallacy even though I believe it to be true. I don't believe a person who is a real Christian would be likely to abandon his/her marriage.

All men, including Christian people, are sinners. That's in the Bible.

They cheat, divorce, abuse spouses, lie, etc etc etc.

Being Christian does not mean not sinning. Otherwise, why would Jesus have died for us?





This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
I always thought the main purpose of a honeymoon was for a new married couple to spend time alone (hopefully) together and the main purpose being to consummate their marriage. I.E have sex for with each other for the first time.

But in the modern era, only 5% or so of married couples are virgins when they get married. So what is the point of a honeymoon anyway when the married couple may well have been having sex for months or even years beforehand anyway?

Kinda creepy that you are focused on what happens between a couple in their bedroom (or kitchen or laundry room.....)
 
Back
Top Bottom