Slate article shows how feminism fails women

I swear you couldn’t make this up, this would’ve been a parody 20 years ago

I’m a very hot woman. Why do average-looking guys hit on me like they have a chance?

I’m an attractive and intelligent woman in my mid-30s. To a certain extent, I know these things to be true. I’ve worked for 15 years as a successful commercial model, and I have a master’s degree and an above-average IQ. I’m in incredible shape. Also important to add: I definitely don’t come across as modest or sexually conservative. I post lingerie and bikini selfies.

Click to expand...

By intelligent she probably means “liberal” when women talk about how intelligent they are it is usually a political thing. If you have to tell people you are then you probably aren’t.

But listen to this, she’s blown her college education, thinks she’s smarter then she is and apparently has deep feelings of inadequacy. Because there’s no other reason to self describe yourself as “attractive” and post lingerie photos. This may come as a shock, everyone knows what a woman looks like, she ain’t that special. But here’s the kicker

Listen to this, this is really sad, this poor woman was victimized by feminism

When I date, my primary interest is finding partners who excite me physically and fulfill me sexually. For reasons I don’t understand, I rarely attract these men anymore. The men who flock to me, asking me out to the tune of several times a week (!), are average- or below-average-looking smart guys. These men have everything I’m looking for in a friend, but they aren’t what I want in a dating partner. My take is that they think my academic interests and penchant for elevated conversation will make me fall for them despite an obvious attractiveness gap. If I was looking for a marriage partner or someone to start a family with, that might be true. But I’m not! I want hot sex with semi-committed medium-term partners.

Click to expand...

I think deep down she knows the truth. She’s not as attractive as she once was, and she was never that attractive to start with, and so she blew her twenties having loose sex with undesirable men and now she’s coming to the realization that the blessings nature gave her in order to attract a good man who will provide were wasted. And she is trying to hold on to her self image by turning away the few remaining quality men who try to get close to her.
And by 40 she will be done, only true losers who are lonely will want to be with her. Because a successful man in his 30s can always have a 24 or 25 y/o woman.


Remember the more sexual partners a woman had in the past is a greater danger she will file for divorce. They lose to ability to properly bond, this lady knows she wants these “average men” but she can’t feel like she does, because she’s f***ed away her ability to pair bond.

Really sad. And of course the response by the advice columnists is not to warn younger women reading to stop having loose sex Now.

But anyway the decline and fall of west on full display.

What makes you think the letter was actually based on a real person?

Some random women can't get the date she wants, therefore feminism has failed?
You're so ****ing dumb.

Feminism is fundamentally flawed because it posits that men and women are equal. In reality, women are FAR better than men.

Airyaman said:

What makes you think the letter was actually based on a real person?

Click to expand...

Because half of all millennial women are childless

• Percentage of childless women, by age U.S. 2018 | Statista.

In the 1950s a poem dedicated to Homosexual degeneracy was released, Allan Ginsburg’s Howl was unknown in the larger public, and if you asked any normal person they would have turned away in revulsion to the content.

Today it’s taught in universities and is considered the opening salvo of the sexual revolution.

You can’t ignore what’s being written. First off you know this is a real person because the source isn’t one that would fabricate it, second even if this were a troll the response shows the slate sex opinion writers sure believe it.

RabidAlpaca said:

Feminism is fundamentally flawed because it posits that men and women are equal. In reality, women are FAR better than men.

Click to expand...

In the sense of being able to birth and nurture young children that is absolutely true.

EMNofSeattle said:

Because half of all millennial women are childless

• Percentage of childless women, by age U.S. 2018 | Statista.

In the 1950s a poem dedicated to Homosexual degeneracy was released, Allan Ginsburg’s Howl was unknown in the larger public, and if you asked any normal person they would have turned away in revulsion to the content.

Today it’s taught in universities and is considered the opening salvo of the sexual revolution.

You can’t ignore what’s being written. First off you know this is a real person because the source isn’t one that would fabricate it, second even if this were a troll the response shows the slate sex opinion writers sure believe it.

Click to expand...

That didn't answer the question. How do you know the letter wasn't just made up by some lonely incel?

Airyaman said:

That didn't answer the question. How do you know the letter wasn't just made up by some lonely incel?

Click to expand...

If you have evidence of such then we can discuss that. Otherwise Slate doesn’t seem to believe it is because they ran it

EMNofSeattle said:

If you have evidence of such then we can discuss that. Otherwise Slate doesn’t seem to believe it is because they ran it

Click to expand...

They are simply responding to a letter. You are using this letter to assert whoever wrote it is a real person in that the letter actually describes a portion of their real life thoughts. It might be all fiction.

Airyaman said:

That didn't answer the question. How do you know the letter wasn't just made up by some lonely incel?

Click to expand...

I have no regard for your misinformation attempts.

I can write how reptilians control the British royal family. Doesn’t matter.

Clearly Slate believes it is real or they wouldn’t have run it

EMNofSeattle said:

I have no regard for your misinformation attempts.

I can write how reptilians control the British royal family. Doesn’t matter.

Clearly Slate believes it is real or they wouldn’t have run it

Click to expand...

Your thread title reads "Slate article shows how feminism fails women" but base it solely on a letter that you can not verify is even about a real person. You may be mislead by a work of fiction.

Airyaman said:

Your thread title reads "Slate article shows how feminism fails women" but base it solely on a letter that you can not verify is even about a real person. You may be mislead by a work of fiction.

Click to expand...

I am not being misled by your misinformation attempt

Airyaman said:

Your thread title reads "Slate article shows how feminism fails women" but base it solely on a letter that you can not verify is even about a real person. You may be mislead by a work of fiction.

Click to expand...

EMN absolutely loathes women and scours the internet looking for things to confirm his bias. You're wasting your breath. Never argue facts with a "feelings" guy.

EMNofSeattle said:

I swear you couldn’t make this up, this would’ve been a parody 20 years ago

I’m a very hot woman. Why do average-looking guys hit on me like they have a chance?



By intelligent she probably means “liberal” when women talk about how intelligent they are it is usually a political thing. If you have to tell people you are then you probably aren’t.

But listen to this, she’s blown her college education, thinks she’s smarter then she is and apparently has deep feelings of inadequacy. Because there’s no other reason to self describe yourself as “attractive” and post lingerie photos. This may come as a shock, everyone knows what a woman looks like, she ain’t that special. But here’s the kicker

Listen to this, this is really sad, this poor woman was victimized by feminism



I think deep down she knows the truth. She’s not as attractive as she once was, and she was never that attractive to start with, and so she blew her twenties having loose sex with undesirable men and now she’s coming to the realization that the blessings nature gave her in order to attract a good man who will provide were wasted. And she is trying to hold on to her self image by turning away the few remaining quality men who try to get close to her.
And by 40 she will be done, only true losers who are lonely will want to be with her. Because a successful man in his 30s can always have a 24 or 25 y/o woman.


Remember the more sexual partners a woman had in the past is a greater danger she will file for divorce. They lose to ability to properly bond, this lady knows she wants these “average men” but she can’t feel like she does, because she’s f***ed away her ability to pair bond.

Really sad. And of course the response by the advice columnists is not to warn younger women reading to stop having loose sex Now.

But anyway the decline and fall of west on full display.

Click to expand...

sexual identity has been fizzled in the age of feminism

EMNofSeattle said:

I swear you couldn’t make this up, this would’ve been a parody 20 years ago

I’m a very hot woman. Why do average-looking guys hit on me like they have a chance?



By intelligent she probably means “liberal” when women talk about how intelligent they are it is usually a political thing. If you have to tell people you are then you probably aren’t.

But listen to this, she’s blown her college education, thinks she’s smarter then she is and apparently has deep feelings of inadequacy. Because there’s no other reason to self describe yourself as “attractive” and post lingerie photos. This may come as a shock, everyone knows what a woman looks like, she ain’t that special. But here’s the kicker

Listen to this, this is really sad, this poor woman was victimized by feminism



I think deep down she knows the truth. She’s not as attractive as she once was, and she was never that attractive to start with, and so she blew her twenties having loose sex with undesirable men and now she’s coming to the realization that the blessings nature gave her in order to attract a good man who will provide were wasted. And she is trying to hold on to her self image by turning away the few remaining quality men who try to get close to her.
And by 40 she will be done, only true losers who are lonely will want to be with her. Because a successful man in his 30s can always have a 24 or 25 y/o woman.


Remember the more sexual partners a woman had in the past is a greater danger she will file for divorce. They lose to ability to properly bond, this lady knows she wants these “average men” but she can’t feel like she does, because she’s f***ed away her ability to pair bond.

Really sad. And of course the response by the advice columnists is not to warn younger women reading to stop having loose sex Now.

But anyway the decline and fall of west on full display.

Click to expand...

look at this



instead of looking for good relationships and steady happiness they advocate for dating bad boys and leading men on

RabidAlpaca said:

EMN absolutely loathes women and scours the internet looking for things to confirm his bias. You're wasting your breath. Never argue facts with a "feelings" guy.

Click to expand...

I do not loathe women.

I merely loathe political feminism. That’s not the same thing.

TypicalRussian said:

look at this

View attachment 67285440

instead of looking for good relationships and steady happiness they advocate for dating bad boys and leading men on

Click to expand...

And she advocates finding a man who expects her to act like a man. The best and happiest relationships are between a masculine man and feminine woman who understand that they are different and structure their relationship accordingly.

I am not doing equal domestic work with a wife when I work 20+ hours of overtime and I don’t expect a wife to pull down equal or greater income.

This is a recipe for disaster. It is far better for a household to understand the marriage (not relationship or partnership or whatever cold unemotional terminology they use today is) is a complementary and not egalitarian one.

It is also really bad to date men a lady would never marry, because that sort of man will tempt her into impure physical acts and rob her of her ability to bond to a suitable husband

EMNofSeattle said:

And she advocates finding a man who expects her to act like a man. The best and happiest relationships are between a masculine man and feminine woman who understand that they are different and structure their relationship accordingly.

I am not doing equal domestic work with a wife when I work 20+ hours of overtime and I don’t expect a wife to pull down equal or greater income.

This is a recipe for disaster. It is far better for a household to understand the marriage (not relationship or partnership or whatever cold unemotional terminology they use today is) is a complementary and not egalitarian one.

It is also really bad to date men a lady would never marry, because that sort of man will tempt her into impure physical acts and rob her of her ability to bond to a suitable husband

Click to expand...

there is no reason to date other than to find a man to marry and for feminists to advocated this robs women of focusing on femininity and leaves good men dumbfouned how women are dating losers, it has created a rift between the genders that shouldnt exist

and you are right, women do the housework,why you ask? because men were(and still are) the ones who go to work in a coal mine and go to war, it is expected of them and they do it greatly.

And it is NOT DEGRADING, a good house wife brings up family value and in the past women did work on the farm when people were 70% farmers, and this is the issue, technology has developed and made the womens role a lot less work, most people arent farmers and dont have more than 2 kids and thus women are looking for more things to do, unfortunately for them, they are now seeing that being a wageslave is NOT making them happy as men react a lot differently to money than women do. and the rapid economic changes switched to the sex market

women now dont have to marry for a good living, they can achieve it while being promiscuous(companies like this because women shop more than men so they promoted second wave feminism) so to them, it is just enjoying life while not realizing the affects of promiscuity, worse personality and a greater desire to cheat when in a relationship. it has also affected men negatively, men treat women like sex objects, and I know its a big feminist talking point but many men do that which is not right-pimps. The simp who can not get into a relationship worships the women like a God and helps support the negative feminine traits that has always been suppressed in history just like all negative human traits. what the simp doesnt realize is that someday the pimp(bad boy) will not marry and women will marry the simp who can provide the best, who provides the best gets the female attention and combined with no fault divorce means that a women can jump from marriage to marriage with no issue leaving devastating effects on society ever since the 80's.

incels believe or not are products of feminism, they have been sheltered in a sex-crazed, pornographic culture and since they can not get that, they get angry- but the past ugly women married ugly men and that was that. that idea was hijacked due to feminism and has made EVERYTHING sexual and seems to be the end all of everything

they are other theories like the dual mating strategy but good post, want a trad girl? get to church and get a women who is not consumed by social media

TypicalRussian said:

there is no reason to date other than to find a man to marry and for feminists to advocated this robs women of focusing on femininity and leaves good men dumbfouned how women are dating losers, it has created a rift between the genders that shouldnt exist

and you are right, women do the housework,why you ask? because men were(and still are) the ones who go to work in a coal mine and go to war, it is expected of them and they do it greatly.

And it is NOT DEGRADING, a good house wife brings up family value and in the past women did work on the farm when people were 70% farmers, and this is the issue, technology has developed and made the womens role a lot less work, most people arent farmers and dont have more than 2 kids and thus women are looking for more things to do, unfortunately for them, they are now seeing that being a wageslave is NOT making them happy as men react a lot differently to money than women do. and the rapid economic changes switched to the sex market

women now dont have to marry for a good living, they can achieve it while being promiscuous(companies like this because women shop more than men so they promoted second wave feminism) so to them, it is just enjoying life while not realizing the affects of promiscuity, worse personality and a greater desire to cheat when in a relationship. it has also affected men negatively, men treat women like sex objects, and I know its a big feminist talking point but many men do that which is not right-pimps. The simp who can not get into a relationship worships the women like a God and helps support the negative feminine traits that has always been suppressed in history just like all negative human traits. what the simp doesnt realize is that someday the pimp(bad boy) will not marry and women will marry the simp who can provide the best, who provides the best gets the female attention and combined with no fault divorce means that a women can jump from marriage to marriage with no issue leaving devastating effects on society ever since the 80's.

incels believe or not are products of feminism, they have been sheltered in a sex-crazed, pornographic culture and since they can not get that, they get angry- but the past ugly women married ugly men and that was that. that idea was hijacked due to feminism and has made EVERYTHING sexual and seems to be the end all of everything

they are other theories like the dual mating strategy but good post, want a trad girl? get your ass in church

Click to expand...

It’s like the Catholic Church gets knocked for having a hardline against birth control and masturbation, but the truth is, the easiest way to wander into a relationship is when guys who don’t jerk off meet women who don’t take the pill. It sounds crude, within a year of returning to the Church I went from being perpetually single to going on lots of dates with great looking conservative women and now have a serious relationship with a traditional lady. It works.

Maybe because morality is based on a transcendent understanding of how human beings operate?

The hardest pill to swallow is maybe realizing that the reality the society conditioned you to accept is very unhealthy and impersonal and without a strong sense of public morality it is easy for many people to just accept the excesses and then fall into a miserable life.

EMNofSeattle said:

It’s like the Catholic Church gets knocked for having a hardline against birth control and masturbation, but the truth is, the easiest way to wander into a relationship is when guys who don’t jerk off meet women who don’t take the pill. It sounds crude, within a year of returning to the Church I went from being perpetually single to going on lots of dates with great looking conservative women and now have a serious relationship with a traditional lady. It works.

Maybe because morality is based on a transcendent understanding of how human beings operate?

Click to expand...

yep, I dont why nofap is vilified nowadays and porn is somehow "liberating", oh please

and yes it does work, traditional women(not the fake e girls like Lauren southern) are in church and willing to upheld their roles and a man should do the same, it does work yet the marriage market is so messed up beyond repair that so many men(particularity men who got their father vilified under single mothers)dont want to deal with it, I call these people the childs of feminism(mgtow,TRP), they were the first to be so messed up by feminism it has left a permanent ugly smear on them

TypicalRussian said:

yep, I dont why nofap is vilified nowadays and porn is somehow "liberating", oh please

and yes it does work, traditional women(not the fake e girls like Lauren southern) are in church and willing to upheld their roles and a man should do the same, it does work yet the marriage market is so messed up beyond repair that so many men(particularity men who got their father vilified under single mothers)dont want to deal with it, I call these people the childs of feminism(mgtow,TRP), they were the first to be so messed up by feminism it has left a permanent ugly smear on them

Click to expand...

It’s to keep us in a state of captivity. They’ve shown chimpanzees don’t practice masturbation in the wild. Only in captivity.

There are primitive tribes in Africa where researchers found masturbation is unheard of. They literally have no word for it and were confused when researchers explained to them what it was.

Contraception exists only to permit sexual immorality, and it also makes women less attractive. Men subconsciously in studies select photos of women not on the pill as being more attractive.

The sex craze culture we live in of endless porn and self gratification is not “liberation” it is an unnatural imprisonment both men and women.

EMNofSeattle said:

I swear you couldn’t make this up, this would’ve been a parody 20 years ago

I’m a very hot woman. Why do average-looking guys hit on me like they have a chance?



By intelligent she probably means “liberal” when women talk about how intelligent they are it is usually a political thing. If you have to tell people you are then you probably aren’t.

But listen to this, she’s blown her college education, thinks she’s smarter then she is and apparently has deep feelings of inadequacy. Because there’s no other reason to self describe yourself as “attractive” and post lingerie photos. This may come as a shock, everyone knows what a woman looks like, she ain’t that special. But here’s the kicker

Listen to this, this is really sad, this poor woman was victimized by feminism



I think deep down she knows the truth. She’s not as attractive as she once was, and she was never that attractive to start with, and so she blew her twenties having loose sex with undesirable men and now she’s coming to the realization that the blessings nature gave her in order to attract a good man who will provide were wasted. And she is trying to hold on to her self image by turning away the few remaining quality men who try to get close to her.
And by 40 she will be done, only true losers who are lonely will want to be with her. Because a successful man in his 30s can always have a 24 or 25 y/o woman.


Remember the more sexual partners a woman had in the past is a greater danger she will file for divorce. They lose to ability to properly bond, this lady knows she wants these “average men” but she can’t feel like she does, because she’s f***ed away her ability to pair bond.

Really sad. And of course the response by the advice columnists is not to warn younger women reading to stop having loose sex Now.

But anyway the decline and fall of west on full display.

Click to expand...

I dont see why the best men would be interested in an aging snotty model who claims to have vast intelligence but if she does have it she decided not to use it....look at what she does with her life.

The word vapid comes to mind, not generally what A List guys are looking for, they are a dime a dozen.

TypicalRussian said:

sexual identity has been fizzled in the age of feminism

Click to expand...

How has sexual identity changed? Are you suggesting that because women don't have to obey the conservative male idea of what a woman is supposed to be that feminism is destructive, or are you suggesting that feminism means that all women will soon be asexual and non-binary?

Lisa said:

How has sexual identity changed? Are you suggesting that because women don't have to obey the conservative male idea of what a woman is supposed to be that feminism is destructive, or are you suggesting that feminism means that all women will soon be asexual and non-binary?

Click to expand...

Yes, the feminist ideal of egalitarianism is destructive.

EMNofSeattle said:

Yes, the feminist ideal of egalitarianism is destructive.

Click to expand...

Here is something to consider.....In my experience if women ever discover that they have been lied to all of their lives it is in their 30's that they will likely figure it out....once she gets to mid 40's and still has not she is rightfully considered a lost cause.