• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I'm A Lesbian Woman & I'm Leaving The INSANE "Progressive" Left.

Oborosen said:
On a conversation about the democrats, you had to just throw in the same TDS riddled stupidity.

I don't see the republicans arguing with one another on live television, or the RNC cheating to make sure one of their own gets screwed over.

Go whine about Trump somewhere else please.
Click to expand...

You must've missed the bullying to get Trump elected during the 2016 RNC convention....

https://theintercept.com/2016/07/19...-of-bullying-delegates-who-dont-fall-in-line/

White Pride, Bullying and Threats: Trump Delegates Behaving Badly | Cleveland, OH Patch
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
Technically, you say. Before you speak for the "other". Well, that's clever for a child. But you're not a child, are you. So it's pathetic.


:lol:
Click to expand...

sorry you don't get to dictate as to who people identify as.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Good for you, out of millions of lesbian women in the United States, you found one that is a Republican. Kind of like how George Wallace could point to a handful of black supporters.

The vast majority of gays and lesbians don't want to join a club who's members don't like them, many of which believe their sexual orientation is a choice, a sin, and would like for them be treated as second class citizens under the law. I mean for crying out loud dude, your party has as its Vice President, one of the most anti-gay bigots in all of politics.
Click to expand...

1. I am not a "Republican."

2. To the best of my limited knowledge, neither is she. (I could be wrong.)

3. My position on "sexual orientation" has been posted for years. https://www.debatepolitics.com/blogs/captain-adverse/1391-time-re-introduce-myself.html

Meanwhile, as usual, some people miss the point of her commentary. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
1. I am not a "Republican."

2. To the best of my limited knowledge, neither is she. (I could be wrong.)

3. My position on "sexual orientation" has been posted for years. https://www.debatepolitics.com/blogs/captain-adverse/1391-time-re-introduce-myself.html

Meanwhile, as usual, some people miss the point of her commentary. :shrug:
Click to expand...

1. If you typically vote Republican, you are a Republican regardless of what you call yourself.

2. Your personal position on sexual orientation is irrelevant if you typically vote for, and thus empower, a party that has fought to treat gays and lesbians as second class citizens at best, and would return them to that status if they had their wife. It would be like in 1949 saying "I personally support civil rights.", but voting for segregationists.

3. Her argument is as dumb as the lunatics on the extreme "SJW" "woke" crowd she is bitching about. How many gay and lesbian friends do you have? We have several, and I work with several more. They are all Democratic voters, none of them do anything like what she is painting them all with. She is talking about the extreme 2 or 3% or so of the LGBT community, and painting the other 97% as though they are one monolithic block. It would be like me basing my opinion of the whole of Christianity, off of the Fred Phelps bunch.

So her problem is not really with the left. In fact, the reason why she can marry who she wants, is due to social liberals. If she every wants to adopt, she will be able to do so because of social liberals. The fact that gays and lesbians are no longer imprisoned simply for their sexual orientation, is due to social liberals. The fact that her being a lesbian is no longer classified as mental disorder, is due to social liberals. The fact that sodomy laws were struck down as unconstitutional, is due to social liberals.

Her problem is that she obviously has chosen in the past to associate herself with the most lunatic fringe of the far left, and then when she realized how crazy they are, she blamed liberals in general - obviously forgetting that if it were not for liberals, she would be a second class citizen forced to live her life in the closet.

I know a woman that lives in our neighborhood that is bisexual, has kids that she "unschools", and takes on every extreme "SJW" cause she can conceive of. She is a lunatic. So I don't have anything to do with her, but I don't paint every social liberal out there as being just like her because they aren't.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
Wow I just found this video that I really agree with.

As anyone who's been on the Forum long enough should know, I am a supporter of LGB rights, as a natural outgrowth of my ideals about individual rights.

I have not been a supporter of the extremist ideals created over the last, what? Decade maybe?

This video expresses many views I agree with, and explains how some of us recognize the dangers of "hyper-progressivism."

Click to expand...



I didn't realize until now that there were uncle Tom's in the Gay community as well(LOL)
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
3. Her argument is as dumb as the lunatics on the extreme "SJW" "woke" crowd she is bitching about. How many gay and lesbian friends do you have? We have several, and I work with several more. They are all Democratic voters, none of them do anything like what she is painting them all with. She is talking about the extreme 2 or 3% or so of the LGBT community, and painting the other 97% as though they are one monolithic block. It would be like me basing my opinion of the whole of Christianity, off of the Fred Phelps bunch.
Click to expand...

You kind of missed the point. The problem with the Democratic Party today, and liberals in general, are that they have ALLOWED things to be taken too far. There is no moderate side to the Democratic party. They have gone "all in" without any thought of when to stop. You do realize that the ENTIRE collection of democratic nominees are more to the left than President Obama was, right?

Let's talk about the LGBT community. When that community sided with allowing a bunch of men with penises and testicles to call themselves women, they went too far. Men in women's sports? You are correct that many individual gay people don't buy into the whole "everything trans is good" idea. However they have become the silent minority. They are allowing things that are patently wrong to be defended by them (due to their silence). IMHO, the gay community has been used by the trans community too much. The gay community needs to speak up and take back their voice.

Perhaps the real villains here are the media who continue to paint the LBGTQ community as a real community, when they aren't. Just how much do the gay and trans communities really have in common?
 
gino said:
You kind of missed the point. The problem with the Democratic Party today, and liberals in general, are that they have ALLOWED things to be taken too far. There is no moderate side to the Democratic party. They have gone "all in" without any thought of when to stop. You do realize that the ENTIRE collection of democratic nominees are more to the left than President Obama was, right?
Click to expand...

And that differs from the Republican Party how? The most liberal member of the Republican Party today, is more conservative on a whole host of issues than Ronald Reagan was.

The rest of your post proves my point.
 
Mr Person said:
You are surprised by finding idiotic youtube propaganda aimed right at you, or that you are surprised that you agree with it?

Yet another "I hate librul" thread. What's so "insane" about "the left"?

(Wait and see if Adverse responds)
Click to expand...
This isn't an "I hate liberals" video. She isn't talking about liberals she's talking about the far left. The people that think things like sex is a social construct. This isn't liberal it's just madness. It's illiberal.

The more this cockamamie "theory" is presented the less based in science it really is.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Wow I just found this video that I really agree with.

As anyone who's been on the Forum long enough should know, I am a supporter of LGB rights, as a natural outgrowth of my ideals about individual rights.

I have not been a supporter of the extremist ideals created over the last, what? Decade maybe?

This video expresses many views I agree with, and explains how some of us recognize the dangers of "hyper-progressivism."

Click to expand...


There's this weird internal community policing within the LGBT and they get down right nasty. My partner and I have basically been shunned because we choose to live a "heteronormative" lifestyle. By that I mean we are monotonous within our couple, we live together and work to make a home. We are considering children.

I've been called anything from a traitor to the community, to a breeder. I think this is because of what I want my society. I want to be left alone treated like any other person. And the people saying these things to me want to be treated special. And I don't know why.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Wow I just found this video that I really agree with.

As anyone who's been on the Forum long enough should know, I am a supporter of LGB rights, as a natural outgrowth of my ideals about individual rights.

I have not been a supporter of the extremist ideals created over the last, what? Decade maybe?

This video expresses many views I agree with, and explains how some of us recognize the dangers of "hyper-progressivism."

Click to expand...


Free full body massage with Happy ending for women who vote blue and not red!
 
The point is that if a person is LGBT, then there is a very exact set of opinions they all must have as a loyalty thing.

I don't know of anything like that for heterosexuals. Heterosexuals are allowed to have all sorts of differences of opinion from other heterosexuals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom