• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Non-marital sex

Non-marital sex is the best kind of sex. It's even in the Bible those guys back then knew what it was all about.
 
Boobs in your face is a good thing. :)

I am more "passive" in my relationship, but I get my moments when I can take the reigns. I know some lesbians use the terms "top?" and "bottom?", though those terms or typically relegated to gay guys, I guess I'd fit in the "bottom" category.

"Variety is the spice of life"....and the Kamasutra offers a lot of variety. :)

Definitely Not Safe for Work: (PDF) Kama Sutra positions - Deep
 
Is calling a child an oinker and a creepy piglet an example of civility?

It's not for me to say. I'm not passing judgment on this user's words. I'm passing judgment on my own words. Calling someone a troll just because the person spouses some extreme opinions one doesn't agree with, is a personal attack. It's OK to say "I profoundly disagree with your opinion and find it distasteful." But it is not OK to say "you are a troll" or "you are a distasteful person." Expressing disagreement and even disgust at an OPINION is not a personal attack, but attacking the person of the poster who issued the opinion, is.

This is not to say that troll behavior doesn't exist here; it obviously exists everywhere in the Internet, ever since the network was created. But the remedy for when we suspect someone of trolling, is to report it to moderators, not to lash out against the PERSON of the poster.

And in this specific case, I don't actually believe that Mashmont is a troll. He seems to be consistent in his own world view. He is very conservative and expresses ultra-conservative beliefs, but he seems to do it because he genuinely believes in what he says, not merely to get a kick out of others' reactions, which is what trolling is.

Having extreme opinions is not trolling. Expressing extreme opinions (which one may not even genuinely harbor) just to cause a reaction in others is trolling. I believe I misspoke when I called Mashmont a troll.
 
I looked at your "lean". Are they "slightly conservative" porn movies?
Um yeah, you could say.

The ones with Sarah Palin were pretty good. :D

spl54670_023095015-525x615.jpg
 

I don't know if you're pulling our leg about the porn videos, but if not, why are you even soliciting our advice? That's a whole 'nother ballgame

"Ohh, I'm just a poor widow, trying to do to wrestle with the issue of should I have sex outside marriage"

Then "But we make porn videos together".

You have to be trolling.
 
A free sample from the man? You mean like making her car payment for her?

Nah, the new thing in sugar daddy relations is paying off her student loans. :)
 
I don't know if you're pulling our leg about the porn videos, but if not, why are you even soliciting our advice? That's a whole 'nother ballgame

"Ohh, I'm just a poor widow, trying to do to wrestle with the issue of should I have sex outside marriage"

Then "But we make porn videos together".

You have to be trolling.

Oh lighten up. :lol:

Remember what Jesus said -- "Life is an old joke played anew on each generation."
 
It's not for me to say. I'm not passing judgment on this user's words. I'm passing judgment on my own words. Calling someone a troll just because the person spouses some extreme opinions one doesn't agree with, is a personal attack. It's OK to say "I profoundly disagree with your opinion and find it distasteful." But it is not OK to say "you are a troll" or "you are a distasteful person." Expressing disagreement and even disgust at an OPINION is not a personal attack, but attacking the person of the poster who issued the opinion, is.

This is not to say that troll behavior doesn't exist here; it obviously exists everywhere in the Internet, ever since the network was created. But the remedy for when we suspect someone of trolling, is to report it to moderators, not to lash out against the PERSON of the poster.

And in this specific case, I don't actually believe that Mashmont is a troll. He seems to be consistent in his own world view. He is very conservative and expresses ultra-conservative beliefs, but he seems to do it because he genuinely believes in what he says, not merely to get a kick out of others' reactions, which is what trolling is.

Having extreme opinions is not trolling. Expressing extreme opinions (which one may not even genuinely harbor) just to cause a reaction in others is trolling. I believe I misspoke when I called Mashmont a troll.
He is entitled to express his opinions. What he does not do is back them up with proof. For example, a couple of weeks ago he said that the Nobel prize committee are all Marxists. I asked for proof (he calls that trolling) and I am still waiting for the proof. He calls everyone who disagrees with him an atheist and a Marxist.
 
Well that brings up the other unpleasant question I had -- is there any way to say, politely, that I never caught an STD and I never want to?

Saying it like that is as polite as any. Honesty is the best policy, but be aware that people will lie to get laid.
 
I mentioned my concern about STDs tonight, and he seemed insulted that I would ask. I said I don't think he was promiscuous, but maybe his wife was.

He did NOT say he doesn't have any STDs.

He seems like he loves me so much and would never do anything to hurt me. Yet he can't understand why I'm worried about STDs.

You should have married Mr. Rogers. Can you say semi-celibate?

I knew you could.
 
"Variety is the spice of life"....and the Kamasutra offers a lot of variety. :)

Definitely Not Safe for Work: (PDF) Kama Sutra positions - Deep

Variety sat behind me in 9th grade homeroom. She was indeed the spice of life, beautiful. Later on, she narrowly lost winning a state office in Georgia. Life can be cruel to women with advanced degrees who are built like a brick **** house.
 
He is entitled to express his opinions. What he does not do is back them up with proof. For example, a couple of weeks ago he said that the Nobel prize committee are all Marxists. I asked for proof (he calls that trolling) and I am still waiting for the proof. He calls everyone who disagrees with him an atheist and a Marxist.

"Daddy he started it!"
 
Mashmont, I tried to send you a PM but it seems like your storage quota is full and you can't receive further PMs. I just wanted to apologize for having called you a troll. It wasn't civil. Sometimes in the heat of the moment I lash out and later regret it. Civility is good even when we disagree with someone else here. Cheers.

I appreciate your apology, Greatnews. That is decency not often seen in this forum. Consider the matter over.
 
He is entitled to express his opinions. What he does not do is back them up with proof. For example, a couple of weeks ago he said that the Nobel prize committee are all Marxists. I asked for proof (he calls that trolling) and I am still waiting for the proof. He calls everyone who disagrees with him an atheist and a Marxist.

Not really. The trolling part is you people asking the same question 100 times which i have already addressed. If anybody doubts who is trolling and harassing, just look at zyzgy's signature. Both quotes from me.
 
There's never too many gay bombs! :lol:

LOL Funny, but obviously there are those on this forum who live in fear of them, who believe "gay" is catching and believe a "gay bomb" is a terrorist weapon...unless it's dropped on "Mooslums".
 
Back
Top Bottom