• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:363]accepting gay as normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
No gay person gives a flying **** if you accept their lifestyle or not... they just don't want to be treated disrespectfully or discriminated against as a result of it... just like you and I don't want to be treated that way because we are heterosexual.



Absolutely natural... it happens in nature and we are but a part of nature. There are actual issues in the world and your hatred (or mind boggling ignorance) is not helping in any positive way.



Religion is one of the major downfalls of humanity... it unfortunately pits people against each other instead of uniting them.



Homosexuals don't get special treatment. :roll:

If anything, they are still treated poorly.



Is that your idea of speaking intelligently and logically? The two are nothing alike...



Idiotic. You don't understand the difference between two consenting adults and taking a dead body and having sex with it? What is wrong with you?

Both acts are perverted and should not be condoned or normalized. Just live and let live and put it back in the closet.
 
Both acts are perverted and should not be condoned or normalized. Just live and let live and put it back in the closet.

Yes... your posts indicate homophobia, hate and fear...
 
I am not anti-gay, I am anti the gay agenda of forcing me to condone their unnatural sexual behavior. At least you admit that gays are the result of an UNFORTUNATE act of nature. Once again ---Not natural. Sodom and Gomorrah may be fiction but it portrays a demented society based on sexual perversion. You may not like the term "swapping spit" but but it is still an accurate description of the action, gay or straight. If you think that homosexuality should get special treatment and acceptance how about necrophilia? Those individuals were, just like the gays born different. They are not hurting anybody and they practice this behavior behind closed doors. Not infringing on you or me so what is the harm there? Over the top scenario but you get the point, Is nothing sacred anymore?

Necrophilia is ok if the dead person consents. And of course silence means consent.
 
I am not anti-gay, I am anti the gay agenda of forcing me to condone their unnatural sexual behavior. At least you admit that gays are the result of an UNFORTUNATE act of nature. Once again ---Not natural. Sodom and Gomorrah may be fiction but it portrays a demented society based on sexual perversion. You may not like the term "swapping spit" but but it is still an accurate description of the action, gay or straight. If you think that homosexuality should get special treatment and acceptance how about necrophilia? Those individuals were, just like the gays born different. They are not hurting anybody and they practice this behavior behind closed doors. Not infringing on you or me so what is the harm there? Over the top scenario but you get the point, Is nothing sacred anymore?

How are you forced to condone LGBT people? What you are being forced by the government to do? What supposed special treatment do LGBT people seek that you and I as heterosexual don't already enjoy?

What is the gay agenda because it seems that if we change gay to black or interracial your claims are the same as the bigots in the 1950s, who also used their hypocritical religious beliefs as a way to support racism and racial discrimination.
 
I am not anti-gay, I am anti the gay agenda of forcing me to condone their unnatural sexual behavior. At least you admit that gays are the result of an UNFORTUNATE act of nature. Once again ---Not natural. Sodom and Gomorrah may be fiction but it portrays a demented society based on sexual perversion. You may not like the term "swapping spit" but but it is still an accurate description of the action, gay or straight. If you think that homosexuality should get special treatment and acceptance how about necrophilia? Those individuals were, just like the gays born different. They are not hurting anybody and they practice this behavior behind closed doors. Not infringing on you or me so what is the harm there? Over the top scenario but you get the point, Is nothing sacred anymore?

lol. Practitioners of the Abomination of Hypocrisy are worse and right wingers never complain about that.
 
How are you forced to condone LGBT people? What you are being forced by the government to do? What supposed special treatment do LGBT people seek that you and I as heterosexual don't already enjoy?

What is the gay agenda because it seems that if we change gay to black or interracial your claims are the same as the bigots in the 1950s, who also used their hypocritical religious beliefs as a way to support racism and racial discrimination.

One special treatment is the ability to feel what you feel. An LGBT person is not required to feel that heterosexual is normal. The topic is about making heterosexuals feel that gay is normal.

A gay man might become squeamish about having to thin of having sex with a woman. This is how a heterosexual male might get about having to think about having sex with another male. Yet only the heterosexual male has to deal with these negative feelings in pubic, or be called phobic. Lesbians may not like men in a romantic or sexual way, but nobody is forcing them to visualize male-female day after day or be called phobic. The heterosexual is supposed to accept the negative choices go LGBT. Their own negate choices are called phobia.

If we can accept positive feelings and choices, about sexuality, as being natural or DNA based; I like or prefer something, than negative choices and feelings; I do not like or I do not prefer something, should also be considered natural or part of the DNA. Observation indicated that both sides of the coin can cause irrational compulsion. If we can change the innate natural negative opinions of each other, then the natural positive opinions can also be changed. If we cannot change gender preference, than maybe we cannot change gender non-preference. You cannot have it both ways to accommodate liberal social policies.

One can have LGBT friends and acquaintances, and still not be comfortable with their private behavior. Many LGBT do something in reverse. They can gave heterosexual friends but may not be comfortable wth a sexual debate. Aversion can also be part of our programing be it natural or programmed.

One observation I have, is connected to the classic stereo type of homosexuals, show tunes, female impersonators and costumes. In all these cases, the homosexual stereo-type wants to perform in front of an audience. This center stage need. be it natural to programed, could explain the excessive in your face stye of the gays. This touches the negative feelings too often and can create a backlash.

Lesbians are not as flamboyant and they tend to have more acceptance or less negatives. Transsexual tries to exaggerate their preferred sex choice with fashion, which is similar to the decorated gay performer. The performer sexual groups have more of a social problem, because the over acting and in your face style annoying, and will lead to backlashes from natural negative compulsions.

Picture a small child who needs your constant attention. The mother may be able to handle it, if she created it. But the neighbors will get tired of this, especially if it extends too long into adulthood and they believe in balance over lopsided.

I like the idea of don't ask and don't tell. This works among groups of friend who do not discuss religion, politics or other subjects that will cause negative feelings. If you liked Trump and have a liberal friend, but you never discuss politics, you can remain friends. To much of this can drive a wedge. There are many other things to talk about besides Trump or not Trump. If you cross the line, trouble can begin. If you never reach the line, you can be friends. Sexuality appears to work the same way. Heterosexuals do not even like other heterosexual friends being too explicit in front of them, unless the goal is porn instead of romance and/or friends. Too much in your face can alter group dynamics. It si time for LGBT to disappear and blend. Your private life will be better and your social life will be normal.
 
One special treatment is the ability to feel what you feel. An LGBT person is not required to feel that heterosexual is normal. The topic is about making heterosexuals feel that gay is normal.

A gay man might become squeamish about having to thin of having sex with a woman. This is how a heterosexual male might get about having to think about having sex with another male. Yet only the heterosexual male has to deal with these negative feelings in pubic, or be called phobic. Lesbians may not like men in a romantic or sexual way, but nobody is forcing them to visualize male-female day after day or be called phobic. The heterosexual is supposed to accept the negative choices go LGBT. Their own negate choices are called phobia.

If we can accept positive feelings and choices, about sexuality, as being natural or DNA based; I like or prefer something, than negative choices and feelings; I do not like or I do not prefer something, should also be considered natural or part of the DNA. Observation indicated that both sides of the coin can cause irrational compulsion. If we can change the innate natural negative opinions of each other, then the natural positive opinions can also be changed. If we cannot change gender preference, than maybe we cannot change gender non-preference. You cannot have it both ways to accommodate liberal social policies.

One can have LGBT friends and acquaintances, and still not be comfortable with their private behavior. Many LGBT do something in reverse. They can gave heterosexual friends but may not be comfortable wth a sexual debate. Aversion can also be part of our programing be it natural or programmed.

One observation I have, is connected to the classic stereo type of homosexuals, show tunes, female impersonators and costumes. In all these cases, the homosexual stereo-type wants to perform in front of an audience. This center stage need. be it natural to programed, could explain the excessive in your face stye of the gays. This touches the negative feelings too often and can create a backlash.

Lesbians are not as flamboyant and they tend to have more acceptance or less negatives. Transsexual tries to exaggerate their preferred sex choice with fashion, which is similar to the decorated gay performer. The performer sexual groups have more of a social problem, because the over acting and in your face style annoying, and will lead to backlashes from natural negative compulsions.

Picture a small child who needs your constant attention. The mother may be able to handle it, if she created it. But the neighbors will get tired of this, especially if it extends too long into adulthood and they believe in balance over lopsided.

I like the idea of don't ask and don't tell. This works among groups of friend who do not discuss religion, politics or other subjects that will cause negative feelings. If you liked Trump and have a liberal friend, but you never discuss politics, you can remain friends. To much of this can drive a wedge. There are many other things to talk about besides Trump or not Trump. If you cross the line, trouble can begin. If you never reach the line, you can be friends. Sexuality appears to work the same way. Heterosexuals do not even like other heterosexual friends being too explicit in front of them, unless the goal is porn instead of romance and/or friends. Too much in your face can alter group dynamics. It si time for LGBT to disappear and blend. Your private life will be better and your social life will be normal.

If Christians followed dont ask dont tell this would be a much better nation. But they are always in your face
 
Gay people should have always been allowed to get married and it is better for them and society that they can do so now....

Sweden has had same sex marriage as long as any country. They see lees than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages are gay marriage. The gays aren't exactly clamoring to get married. And there really is no justification for such special treatment for gays while continuing to prohibit marriages between closely related people. Other than helping gays feel better about their homosexuality.
 
Sweden has had same sex marriage as long as any country. They see lees than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages are gay marriage. The gays aren't exactly clamoring to get married. And there really is no justification for such special treatment for gays while continuing to prohibit marriages between closely related people. Other than helping gays feel better about their homosexuality.

You are welcome to pursue your support of incest marriage.


Lead the charge
 
Sweden has had same sex marriage as long as any country. They see lees than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages are gay marriage. The gays aren't exactly clamoring to get married. And there really is no justification for such special treatment for gays while continuing to prohibit marriages between closely related people. Other than helping gays feel better about their homosexuality.

Dude, your posts are just ridiculous... it is about equality, not helping them feel better.

Same exact thing that women and that black people had to go through.
 
One special treatment is the ability to feel what you feel. An LGBT person is not required to feel that heterosexual is normal. The topic is about making heterosexuals feel that gay is normal.

A gay man might become squeamish about having to thin of having sex with a woman. This is how a heterosexual male might get about having to think about having sex with another male. Yet only the heterosexual male has to deal with these negative feelings in pubic, or be called phobic. Lesbians may not like men in a romantic or sexual way, but nobody is forcing them to visualize male-female day after day or be called phobic. The heterosexual is supposed to accept the negative choices go LGBT. Their own negate choices are called phobia.

If we can accept positive feelings and choices, about sexuality, as being natural or DNA based; I like or prefer something, than negative choices and feelings; I do not like or I do not prefer something, should also be considered natural or part of the DNA. Observation indicated that both sides of the coin can cause irrational compulsion. If we can change the innate natural negative opinions of each other, then the natural positive opinions can also be changed. If we cannot change gender preference, than maybe we cannot change gender non-preference. You cannot have it both ways to accommodate liberal social policies.

One can have LGBT friends and acquaintances, and still not be comfortable with their private behavior. Many LGBT do something in reverse. They can gave heterosexual friends but may not be comfortable wth a sexual debate. Aversion can also be part of our programing be it natural or programmed.

One observation I have, is connected to the classic stereo type of homosexuals, show tunes, female impersonators and costumes. In all these cases, the homosexual stereo-type wants to perform in front of an audience. This center stage need. be it natural to programed, could explain the excessive in your face stye of the gays. This touches the negative feelings too often and can create a backlash.

Lesbians are not as flamboyant and they tend to have more acceptance or less negatives. Transsexual tries to exaggerate their preferred sex choice with fashion, which is similar to the decorated gay performer. The performer sexual groups have more of a social problem, because the over acting and in your face style annoying, and will lead to backlashes from natural negative compulsions.

Picture a small child who needs your constant attention. The mother may be able to handle it, if she created it. But the neighbors will get tired of this, especially if it extends too long into adulthood and they believe in balance over lopsided.

I like the idea of don't ask and don't tell. This works among groups of friend who do not discuss religion, politics or other subjects that will cause negative feelings. If you liked Trump and have a liberal friend, but you never discuss politics, you can remain friends. To much of this can drive a wedge. There are many other things to talk about besides Trump or not Trump. If you cross the line, trouble can begin. If you never reach the line, you can be friends. Sexuality appears to work the same way. Heterosexuals do not even like other heterosexual friends being too explicit in front of them, unless the goal is porn instead of romance and/or friends. Too much in your face can alter group dynamics. It si time for LGBT to disappear and blend. Your private life will be better and your social life will be normal.

Holy **** dude... people are ****ing different. Get over it. Some heterosexuals are flamboyant, need attention, like to perform... this post of yours is just stupid.
 
Yes... your posts indicate homophobia, hate and fear...[/QUOTE

For the last time, I don't see myself as homophobic. I am quite happy to leave them alone as long as they do not try to meddle in my life. The major problem with gays is their mission of trying to force the rest of us to look at them as normal. What the hell, most gays are not even comfortable in their own skins, so why should I be more accepting than they are of themselves?
 
Yes... your posts indicate homophobia, hate and fear...[/QUOTE

For the last time, I don't see myself as homophobic. I am quite happy to leave them alone as long as they do not try to meddle in my life. The major problem with gays is their mission of trying to force the rest of us to look at them as normal. What the hell, most gays are not even comfortable in their own skins, so why should I be more accepting than they are of themselves?

For the last time, I don't see myself as anti Christian. I am quite happy to leave them alone as long as they do not try to meddle in my life. The major problem with Christians is their mission of trying to force the rest of us to look at them as normal. What the hell, most Christians are not even comfortable in their own skins, so why should I be more accepting than they are of themselves?
 
For the last time, I don't see myself as anti Christian. I am quite happy to leave them alone as long as they do not try to meddle in my life. The major problem with Christians is their mission of trying to force the rest of us to look at them as normal. What the hell, most Christians are not even comfortable in their own skins, so why should I be more accepting than they are of themselves?

Christian does not pertain to me as I am at best a doubting Thomas, agnostic Look around you, If there is a higher power, is he or she really a good guy?
 
I, of course, was not referring to an individuals motives for entering marriage but instead societies motivations in promoting the institution.
Post what society's motivations are, with them clearly written out and how all opposite sex couples fit those motivations, but no same sex couples can.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Post what society's motivations are, with them clearly written out and how all opposite sex couples fit those motivations, but no same sex couples can.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

He does not know what society's motivations are because he is on the No Invite List... that is why he sounds like the whole thing is a conspiracy... because it is... the Best For Society Gay Agenda Conspiracy.
 
For the last time, I don't see myself as homophobic.

Most people that are homophobic probably don't see themselves as homophobic...

I am quite happy to leave them alone as long as they do not try to meddle in my life.

Here we go... what gay people have meddled in your life? :lol:

What was the nature of their meddling?

The major problem with gays is their mission of trying to force the rest of us to look at them as normal.

They are not trying to force anybody to look at them in any way... they just want you to leave them the **** alone and stop trying to oppress them...

What the hell, most gays are not even comfortable in their own skins, so why should I be more accepting than they are of themselves?

You don't sound like you are very comfortable with yourself, to be honest. Lots of worrying about non-existent threats shows a lot of fear.
 
One special treatment is the ability to feel what you feel. An LGBT person is not required to feel that heterosexuality is normal. The topic is about making heterosexuals feel that gay is normal.

A gay man might become squeamish about having to thin of having sex with a woman. This is how a heterosexual male might get about having to think about having sex with another male. Yet only the heterosexual male has to deal with these negative feelings in pubic, or be called phobic. Lesbians may not like men in a romantic or sexual way, but nobody is forcing them to visualize male-female day after day or be called phobic. The heterosexual is supposed to accept the negative choices go LGBT. Their own negate choices are called phobia.



One can have LGBT friends and acquaintances, and still not be comfortable with their private behavior. Many LGBT does something in reverse. They can gave heterosexual friends but may not be comfortable with a sexual debate. Aversion can also be part of our programming be it natural or programmed.

One observation I have is connected to the classic stereo type of homosexuals, show tunes, female impersonators and costumes. In all these cases, the homosexual stereo-type wants to perform in front of an audience. This center stage needs. be it natural to programed, could explain the excessive in your face stye of the gays. This touches the negative feelings too often and can create a backlash.

Lesbians are not as flamboyant and they tend to have more acceptance or fewer negatives. Transsexual tries to exaggerate their preferred sex choice with fashion, which is similar to the decorated gay performer. The performer sexual groups have more of a social problem, because of the over acting and in your face style annoying, and will lead to backlashes from natural negative compulsions.

Picture a small child who needs your constant attention. The mother may be able to handle it, if she created it. But the neighbors will get tired of this, especially if it extends too long into adulthood and they believe in balance over lopsided.

I like the idea of don't ask and don't tell. This works among groups of friends who do not discuss religion, politics or other subjects that will cause negative feelings. If you liked Trump and have a liberal friend, but you never discuss politics, you can remain friends. Too much of this can drive a wedge. There are many other things to talk about besides Trump or not Trump. If you cross the line, trouble can begin. If you never reach the line, you can be friends. Sexuality appears to work the same way. Heterosexuals do not even like other heterosexual friends being too explicit in front of them unless the goal is porn instead of romance and/or friends. Too much in your face can alter group dynamics. It si time for LGBT to disappear and blend. Your private life will be better and your social life will be normal.
I have never seen such a psychologial projection from a person.

Your problem isn't gay, bi or transgdered people but the fact that you aren't very secure in your own gender and sexuality so you are trying to project your insecurities on others and blame them for it. Just come out of the closet and be hapopy instead if trying to attack others and claim that they are at fault for your very obvious insecurities. Your behavior is typical because rational and people who are confuident in their selves don't care what a very small minority does, especially when that minority tends to keep to themselves other than to protest discrimination.

Have gays bi or transgendered ever argued for limiting the secular or religious rights of us heterosexuals? I have more than a few LGBT friends and we have never had that conversation, but maybe that is part of the evil secret gay agenda that they also won't tell me about.

You have the right to feel the way that you do but you don't have the right to enact those bigoted feelings as secular law and deny others their equal rights. The free speech of others doesn't spot at the vestibule of your church.

I know many lesbians who are very flamboyant, but they aren't the majority.
You don't seem to know the difference between someone who is transgender and someone who is a crossdresser or transvestite because 99% of transgdered people want to blend in as CIS people. They don't want to stand out it it is often not safe from themn to do so.

Did you forget that bisexuals are half hetero and many transgendered people are very heterosexual in their psychological gender role?
 
Most people that are homophobic probably don't see themselves as homophobic...



Here we go... what gay people have meddled in your life? :lol:

What was the nature of their meddling?



They are not trying to force anybody to look at them in any way... they just want you to leave them the **** alone and stop trying to oppress them...



You don't sound like you are very comfortable with yourself, to be honest. Lots of worrying about non-existent threats show a lot of fear.

That is the cornerstone of his aversion to LGBT people. He is deep in the closet himself and he subconsciously blames LGBT people for the very uncomfortable sexual feelings that he cannot surpress.

This idea has scientific merit.
Homophobes Might Be Hidden Homosexuals - Scientific American
 
I am not anti-gay, I am anti the gay agenda of forcing me to condone their unnatural sexual behavior. At least you admit that gays are the result of an UNFORTUNATE act of nature. Once again ---Not natural. Sodom and Gomorrah may be fiction but it portrays a demented society based on sexual perversion. You may not like the term "swapping spit" but but it is still an accurate description of the action, gay or straight. If you think that homosexuality should get special treatment and acceptance how about necrophilia? Those individuals were, just like the gays born different. They are not hurting anybody and they practice this behavior behind closed doors. Not infringing on you or me so what is the harm there? Over the top scenario but you get the point, Is nothing sacred anymore?
Sodom and Gomorrah has nothing to do with homosexuality. Only those who are ignorant of the actual tales of those cities could believe that. Or those who think, wrongly, that trying to rape someone to exert dominance, humiliate is an act of attraction.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Both acts are perverted and should not be condoned or normalized. Just live and let live and put it back in the closet.
You are free to actually go into the closet yourself, the rest of us will accept same sex relationships and homosexuality for what they are, people, living couples, just as normal and natural and perverted as opposite sex couples and heterosexuals. Regardless of your personal opinion.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Sweden has had same sex marriage as long as any country. They see lees than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages are gay marriage. The gays aren't exactly clamoring to get married. And there really is no justification for such special treatment for gays while continuing to prohibit marriages between closely related people. Other than helping gays feel better about their homosexuality.
Who cares how many want to marry. I bet less than .5% of marriages involve cousins, but they are allowed to legally marry in many places.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Some guys have super hot first cousins... :shrug:
First cousins can legally marry in a lot of states, and their marriages have always been recognized by the US government. And the laws allowing them to marry easily beat down his biggest attempted argument, that marriage is about procreation, and our laws in some way represent that.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom