• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:363]accepting gay as normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
People aren't going to turn gay.

They do it all the time. You hear and read about gays realizing at ages 19 or even later that they realized they were gay. It's a learned response to something they allowed their subconscious to entertain since their early childhood. Some just start doing it because there are no women around and they have no morals. Prisons and wars this happens. The reprobate mind takes over which means they have to lie to themselves and using the false statement that they were "born that way" they rationalize their behavior. Consciousness of mankind creates this ability to rationalize bad behavior.
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

Who is this 'We' you speak of ? And you aren't going to win any arguments by putting YOUR words in OTHER's mouths, FYI.

The religious people your side constantly attacks is "We." We hate the sin but not the sinner. Your side hates the sinner but loves the sin.
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

The religious people your side constantly attacks is "We." We hate the sin but not the sinner. Your side hates the sinner but loves the sin.

What is this 'your side' you are now referencing?
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

What is this 'your side' you are now referencing?

The non-believer. The atheists. The haters of the religious. The condescending of religions and believers.
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

The non-believer. The atheists. The haters of the religious. The condescending of religions and believers.

I'm a non-believer, and I don't hate the religious. Maybe you're simply projecting YOUR hate of the non-religious ? However, 'if' you can pull up any post in which I have claimed to 'hate the religious'....please do so, and I'll gladly apologize. Good luck in that endeavor!
 
They do it all the time. You hear and read about gays realizing at ages 19 or even later that they realized they were gay. It's a learned response to something they allowed their subconscious to entertain since their early childhood. Some just start doing it because there are no women around and they have no morals. Prisons and wars this happens. The reprobate mind takes over which means they have to lie to themselves and using the false statement that they were "born that way" they rationalize their behavior. Consciousness of mankind creates this ability to rationalize bad behavior.

Realizing that you are gay is not "turning" gay.
 
Show me any research that claims 100% that people are born gay. You won't be able to find it. It doesn't exist. At best, it's a 50-50 result with every study over the last 30 years. It's your claim that isn't supported.
It is far more than 50/50.

And no research is 100%. Research supports or disproves a hypothesis. It cannot actually prove the hypothesis, only disprove or provide supporting evidence.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
They do it all the time. You hear and read about gays realizing at ages 19 or even later that they realized they were gay. It's a learned response to something they allowed their subconscious to entertain since their early childhood. Some just start doing it because there are no women around and they have no morals. Prisons and wars this happens. The reprobate mind takes over which means they have to lie to themselves and using the false statement that they were "born that way" they rationalize their behavior. Consciousness of mankind creates this ability to rationalize bad behavior.
No they dont. They were gay, and simply admitted to their attractions.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

The religious people your side constantly attacks is "We." We hate the sin but not the sinner. Your side hates the sinner but loves the sin.
Religious people are not a fully united group against the other side. Most on "the other side" are also religious.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

I'm a non-believer, and I don't hate the religious. Maybe you're simply projecting YOUR hate of the non-religious ? However, 'if' you can pull up any post in which I have claimed to 'hate the religious'....please do so, and I'll gladly apologize. Good luck in that endeavor!

I didn't say you specifically.
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

I didn't say you specifically.

Post # 577 indicates otherwise. Your words -----> /// "your side' ///....No exceptions mentioned; therefore it is implied.
 
Last edited:
Who are these people who recruit heterosexuals?

Whio told you that gays recruit people?

What is the "dark side" that you speak of? :lol:

They are the ones with the cookies
 
They are the ones with the cookies

I hope those cookies don't have raisins in because I hate them. They looked like dead flies to me as a child and I've never gotten over it.
 
I hope those cookies don't have raisins in because I hate them. They looked like dead flies to me as a child and I've never gotten over it.

They have the ones with chocolate chips .. (and don't worry, we used up all the flies in the raisin bread).

"Waiter waiter, there is a fly in my soup"
"Impossible, we used them all up in the cookies."
 
They have the ones with chocolate chips .. (and don't worry, we used up all the flies in the raisin bread).

"Waiter waiter, there is a fly in my soup"
"Impossible, we used them all up in the cookies."

:lol:

Gay people would eat biscotti or madeleines because they are hipper............
 
Gay is NOT "normal" - it just isn't.
Statistically, empirically or by any other means of measuring.

More importantly, the discussion is REALLY whether it's something that's healthy or unhealthy for people to take part in. Whether it's healthy or unhealthy for societies/cultures to accept & promote.

Medically it has been proven to be unhealthy in almost every way. Mentally, physically, higher incidences of diseases etc. As for negative results in society & culture ? We've seen many.

Who could have POSSIBLY seen THIS coming ?? Those that warned us were called "homophobes" & other names, laughed at, dismissed as nuts, dismissed as silly.

No ! It was a GREAT idea to let "gays" join the boy scouts ! ... especially great if you're gay ; ) - "How exciting ! Cute young boys to be alone in the woods with !"
Except darn it, now ... well now it looks like THAT opportunity will soon disappear. Boy Scouts are going bankrupt !!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"HEADLINE: Boy Scouts Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the Face of Thousands of Child Abuse Allegations

For decades, the BSA has fended off lawsuits demanding that they embrace the holy trinity of G's: girls, gays and godless atheists."
We do have to.. ".. wonder if any liberals are re-thinking their insistence that the Boy Scouts allow gay men to take 13-year-old boys on overnight camping trips. Within a decade of its 1910 founding, the BSA began keeping internal files on “ineligible” scouting volunteers, known as “the perversion files.”

...starting in 1988, all adult applicants were subjected to aggressive background screening. The organization promptly removed any scout leaders based on mere suspicion and alerted law enforcement in about a third of the cases.
Nonetheless, between 1970 and 1991, up to .04% of Boy Scouts may have been molested. That’s about 2,000 out of several million boys. Given all of this, what sort of escaped mental patient would demand that the Boy Scouts admit openly gay scout leaders?

Times’ “ethicist,” Randy Cohen,..“Just as one is honor bound to quit an organization that excludes African-Americans, so you should withdraw from scouting as long as it rejects homosexuals.”
pre-Super Bowl TV interview in 2013, President Barack Obama was still harping on the Boy Scouts’ refusal to allow gay scoutmasters: “Gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody else does.”
Since the one thing we know is that men molesting boys has nothing to do with being gay, I guess this time it’s camping that causes sodomy."

Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -

Boy Scouts of America (BSA) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after mounting sexual abuse claims..victims in over two dozen states, the cases represent "thousands of perpetrators" and "tens of thousands of victims."

..one next wonders how an outfit with a 110-year history of teaching boys how to become virtuous men and good community stewards wound up plummeting from such heights.

In July of 2015, the Boy Scouts of America announced that it was lifting its national ban on homosexual adult leaders. This came after years of activist pressure, during which the BSA was encouraged to admit homosexual Scouts, Scout leaders and, finally, girls to their ranks.

Some may remember the contrived, self-serving doctrine the LGBTQ lobby trotted out when parents and others voiced concerns that allowing homosexuals to serve as scoutmasters and to occupy other positions of authority might lead to an increased risk of children being sexually abused: Gay men don't molest boys; it's straight men who are the pedophiles.

Well, we now know this to be patently false. Homosexuals were allowed into the Boy Scouts. The BSA is now experiencing an epidemic of sexual misconduct and lawsuits. This was not the case prior to their admittance of homosexuals into the organization....denying the correlation is as irrational as denying the existence of gravity.

...biologists Colin M. Wright and Emma N. Hilton asserted that that sex is binary and there is no "gender spectrum," as LGBTQ activists and their supporters have arbitrarily declared.

I find it chilling that we need biologists to remind us of that fact at this juncture.
Those on the left will no more admit a correlation between instances of sexual misconduct in the Boy Scouts and the admission of homosexuals into the organization than they will acknowledge a correlation between violence perpetrated by Muslims and the fact that they are Muslims. The fact remains, however: When you foster moral ambivalence today, you wind up with a greater degree of moral turpitude tomorrow.
The 5-year descent and crash of the Boy Scouts - WND
 
Last edited:
Gay is NOT "normal" - it just isn't.
Statistically, empirically or by any other means of measuring.

More importantly, the discussion is REALLY whether it's something that's healthy or unhealthy for people to take part in. Whether it's healthy or unhealthy for societies/cultures to accept & promote.

Medically it has been proven to be unhealthy in almost every way. Mentally, physically, higher incidences of diseases etc. As for negative results in society & culture ? We've seen many.

Who could have POSSIBLY seen THIS coming ?? Those that warned us were called "homophobes" & other names, laughed at, dismissed as nuts, dismissed as silly.

No ! It was a GREAT idea to let "gays" join the boy scouts ! ... especially great if you're gay ; ) - "How exciting ! Cute young boys to be alone in the woods with !"
Except darn it, now ... well now it looks like THAT opportunity will soon disappear. Boy Scouts are going bankrupt !!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -


The 5-year descent and crash of the Boy Scouts - WND

What does the boy scouts have to do with this?
 
Gay is NOT "normal" - it just isn't.
Statistically, empirically or by any other means of measuring.

More importantly, the discussion is REALLY whether it's something that's healthy or unhealthy for people to take part in. Whether it's healthy or unhealthy for societies/cultures to accept & promote.

Medically it has been proven to be unhealthy in almost every way. Mentally, physically, higher incidences of diseases etc. As for negative results in society & culture ? We've seen many.

Who could have POSSIBLY seen THIS coming ?? Those that warned us were called "homophobes" & other names, laughed at, dismissed as nuts, dismissed as silly.

No ! It was a GREAT idea to let "gays" join the boy scouts ! ... especially great if you're gay ; ) - "How exciting ! Cute young boys to be alone in the woods with !"
Except darn it, now ... well now it looks like THAT opportunity will soon disappear. Boy Scouts are going bankrupt !!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -


The 5-year descent and crash of the Boy Scouts - WND

Ann Coulter and World Nut Daily. :doh

FYI: Pedophiles are usually those who pretend to be straight, living with woman when they actually crave children. It has nothing to do with being gay. But, of course, World Nut Daily and Ann the coloseted Lesbian would never tell you that.
 
Re: accepting gay as normal

Gays are not normal, they are exceptional! Like people who are left handed, or have a genius IQ.

I would tend to agree but since gay folks have been in the mix, at least since the beginning of recorded history, I look upon their existence as normal as rain, red-head's and left handed people. And some are even exceptional! And, some are just normal gay folks.

But I do hear what you are saying and in that context, I agree.
 
The thread is about gays not pedophiles. So I ask again what does the boy scouts have to do with this?

I'll TRY to connect the dots for you.... you're aware of the "gay" issue the boy scouts have had, you should be, this IS a political forum, NOT a knitting circle for grandmas.

SO ...you'll be aware that the matter was pushed so hard by the gay Gestapo, that the Boy Scouts gave in & decided to allow "gays" into the Boy Scouts, even into leadership positions. . . you can read the article I provided - there's even a link ! Fancy NO ? ; )

So "gays" were allowed into the Boy Scouts. The article exposes the results of that decision.

Deny it, say it ain't so, pretend you're unable to comprehend the connection... that's an issue only you can resolve & I'll leave you to it.

Ann Coulter and World Nut Daily. :doh

FYI: Pedophiles are usually those who pretend to be straight, living with woman when they actually crave children. It has nothing to do with being gay. But, of course, World Nut Daily and Ann the coloseted Lesbian would never tell you that.

Yes, Coulter & worldnut daily - two favorite sources for liberals to hate - because neither are afraid of exposing the idiocies and nasty results of liberal ideas.

Then you offer a clever statement on how pedophiles and gays have NO connection. . . even though the connection is clearly made, given the exposed results.

Lie, deny, call Ann a lesbian.

Now - I'll save you time, you're welcome - you get to say I'm a closeted gay, because I'm offering evidence showing how recent events illustrate a connection to homosexuality & pedophilia.

The topic is "accepting gay as normal."

Which we mostly have done in America.

We're seeing some of the results.

Some of us don't like that.
 
I'll TRY to connect the dots for you.... you're aware of the "gay" issue the boy scouts have had, you should be, this IS a political forum, NOT a knitting circle for grandmas.

SO ...you'll be aware that the matter was pushed so hard by the gay Gestapo, that the Boy Scouts gave in & decided to allow "gays" into the Boy Scouts, even into leadership positions. . . you can read the article I provided - there's even a link ! Fancy NO ? ; )

So "gays" were allowed into the Boy Scouts. The article exposes the results of that decision.

Deny it, say it ain't so, pretend you're unable to comprehend the connection... that's an issue only you can resolve & I'll leave you to it.



Yes, Coulter & worldnut daily - two favorite sources for liberals to hate - because neither are afraid of exposing the idiocies and nasty results of liberal ideas.

Then you offer a clever statement on how pedophiles and gays have NO connection. . . even though the connection is clearly made, given the exposed results.

Lie, deny, call Ann a lesbian.

Now - I'll save you time, you're welcome - you get to say I'm a closeted gay, because I'm offering evidence showing how recent events illustrate a connection to homosexuality & pedophilia.

The topic is "accepting gay as normal."

Which we mostly have done in America.

We're seeing some of the results.

Some of us don't like that.

So, are you saying that gay people are pedophiles? Yes or no.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom