• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are sluts relationship impaired?

SDET

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
7,802
Reaction score
1,610
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I'm not talking about judgement nor "shaming". I'm talking about the objective risk of men falling into failed relationships. Or more specifically, the risk of being stuck with a decade or more of child support, parental alienation, substantial loss of assets, the distraction of a failed relationship to career building, etc. What kind of women represent a higher risk to young men regarding the above-mentioned casualties?
 
I'm not talking about judgement nor "shaming". I'm talking about the objective risk of men falling into failed relationships. Or more specifically, the risk of being stuck with a decade or more of child support, parental alienation, substantial loss of assets, the distraction of a failed relationship to career building, etc. What kind of women represent a higher risk to young men regarding the above-mentioned casualties?
The problem with your question is that there is no objective criteria for what makes one a slut (which is not limited to women, BTW). A person who is selective about their partners, but still has 4, 5, or more in a given time period, may seems a slut to some, but tame to others. For that matter, for some, a monogamous woman who enjoys and looks forward to sex is a slut.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk
 
The problem with your question is that there is no objective criteria for what makes one a slut (which is not limited to women, BTW). A person who is selective about their partners, but still has 4, 5, or more in a given time period, may seems a slut to some, but tame to others. For that matter, for some, a monogamous woman who enjoys and looks forward to sex is a slut.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk

That's a good point. What kind of woman would cause you to say to your son, "You might want to rethink that relationship you're in"?
 
That's a good point. What kind of woman would cause you to say to your son, "You might want to rethink that relationship you're in"?

Needle marks.
 
That's a good point. What kind of woman would cause you to say to your son, "You might want to rethink that relationship you're in"?
Given that we ourselves are both open and poly, it certainly wouldn't be based on number of partners. Cheating, abusive behavior, consistent selfish behavior....these are the red flags that would have me tell my kids (again these things are not limited to any gender) to rethink and reevaluate.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk
 
Are man-whores relationship-impaired?
 
Are man-whores relationship-impaired?
There is a difference between sluts and whores.

Whores get paid. You mean man sluts, of which there are plenty.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk
 
Are man-whores relationship-impaired?

You raise an interesting question. What are the consequences of getting that question wrong?
 
That's a good point. What kind of woman would cause you to say to your son, "You might want to rethink that relationship you're in"?

Evidence of cannibalism.
 
I'm not talking about judgement nor "shaming". I'm talking about the objective risk of men falling into failed relationships. Or more specifically, the risk of being stuck with a decade or more of child support, parental alienation, substantial loss of assets, the distraction of a failed relationship to career building, etc. What kind of women represent a higher risk to young men regarding the above-mentioned casualties?

Who the **** cares as long as we are talking about consenting adults??
 
Who the **** cares as long as we are talking about consenting adults??

Because even when they are adults, one should care if one's children are on a path that will **** up their life. One thing my wife and I agree on: Do everything in one's power to prevent your son from marrying a Cubana that still lives in Cuba. They are great playthings but as treacherous as hell.
 
Because even when they are adults, one should care if one's children are on a path that will **** up their life. One thing my wife and I agree on: Do everything in one's power to prevent your son from marrying a Cubana that still lives in Cuba. They are great playthings but as treacherous as hell.

So you believe that entire group of people are bad. Got it.
 
Because even when they are adults, one should care if one's children are on a path that will **** up their life. One thing my wife and I agree on: Do everything in one's power to prevent your son from marrying a Cubana that still lives in Cuba. They are great playthings but as treacherous as hell.

Imagine that a right wing racist. You don't have to be a stereotype.
 
I'm not talking about judgement nor "shaming". I'm talking about the objective risk of men falling into failed relationships. Or more specifically, the risk of being stuck with a decade or more of child support, parental alienation, substantial loss of assets, the distraction of a failed relationship to career building, etc. What kind of women represent a higher risk to young men regarding the above-mentioned casualties?

What about anything you just described there means a woman is a slut? Isnt a slut just ( a derogatory term for) someone that some people judge because they choose to enjoy sex with a variety of partners? Much like many men?
 
Because even when they are adults, one should care if one's children are on a path that will **** up their life. One thing my wife and I agree on: Do everything in one's power to prevent your son from marrying a Cubana that still lives in Cuba. They are great playthings but as treacherous as hell.

And dont get me started on dentists
 
Needle play is a thing. Just saying.
But they don't usually leave the type of marks he's talking about.

I like when they add the ribbon or colored string.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk
 
So you believe that entire group of people are bad. Got it.

I have seen too many guys get burned that way. Guys like us run into each other at bed and breakfasts and tourist restaurants. It's a cool place to compare notes, hazards, experiences, prices, expectations, etc. It seems to be the Communism that ruins them. On YouTube search for a video by Master Secrets entitled "Los Cubanos son unos INTERESADOS!!??" (Are Cubans self serving). He hits the nail right on the head.
 
I have seen too many guys get burned that way. Guys like us run into each other at bed and breakfasts and tourist restaurants. It's a cool place to compare notes, hazards, experiences, prices, expectations, etc. It seems to be the Communism that ruins them. On YouTube search for a video by Master Secrets entitled "Los Cubanos son unos INTERESADOS!!??" (Are Cubans self serving). He hits the nail right on the head.

How do women that enjoy sex with multiple partners, just like men, 'burn' guys? What is the connection there?
 
How do women that enjoy sex with multiple partners, just like men, 'burn' guys? What is the connection there?

Guys get burned by being stupid enough to invest a ton of money then getting dumped. Be smart; rent her by the day.

Have you heard the expression "A word to the wise is sufficient"? There is a certain way to manage being with a Cubana. It just boils down to being realistic about their nature. One asked me for $500 using a hard luck story. I decided not to bother with her. If I had, I would have explained that if she wanted $500, she would need to give me the best three weeks of my life and be on-point each and every day. The reply is generally "What do you want me to do?" Essentially she needs to be a combination of a doting mistress and knowledgeable tour guide.

There's one chica that practically begs me to stay in touch with her. I told her I would see her on my next trip if she communicates a good plan to enjoy places in the Sierra Maestra mountains. She assured me that she will see to it that I have the time of my life in more ways than one.
 
Guys get burned by being stupid enough to invest a ton of money then getting dumped. Be smart; rent her by the day.

.

Why does a woman need to be a slut to do that? Sluts dont ask for money. You are very very familiar with prostitutes...it's all about transactions with you and also with them...maybe that is why you relate so closely to prostitutes. Except they do it to make a living, to survive...you treat all your relationships like that. It's disturbing. But it certainly does explain why you emotionally connect so well with hookers...you are very much the same.

But if you must use derogatory, hypocritical (double standard) terms, sluts just enjoy sex with multiple partners. So maybe in your examples he's the only one stupid enough to get taken, maybe he's such a weak individual he cannot get her respect and she does so and dumps him. Nothing in your example discusses multiple partners.

Men take advantage of women all the time...esp. in places where you travel, they impregnate women and dump them. And then they criticize them for getting abortions :roll:
 
Why does a woman need to be a slut to do that? Sluts dont ask for money. You are very very familiar with prostitutes...it's all about transactions with you and also with them...maybe that is why you relate so closely to prostitutes. Except they do it to make a living, to survive...you treat all your relationships like that. It's disturbing. But it certainly does explain why you emotionally connect so well with hookers...you are very much the same.

But if you must use derogatory, hypocritical (double standard) terms, sluts just enjoy sex with multiple partners. So maybe in your examples he's the only one stupid enough to get taken, maybe he's such a weak individual he cannot get her respect and she does so and dumps him. Nothing in your example discusses multiple partners.

Men take advantage of women all the time...esp. in places where you travel, they impregnate women and dump them. And then they criticize them for getting abortions :roll:

No no no, we can't have that, can we? Women are just baby factories designed for the man's pleasure. :roll:
 
Guys get burned by being stupid enough to invest a ton of money then getting dumped.

A lot of men destroy women's lives. We're not innocent. Get over yourself. :)

Be smart; rent her by the day.

So you view women as commodities. Got it.
 
Guys get burned by being stupid enough to invest a ton of money then getting dumped.

It's really sad that you believe your experience of needing to spend 'tons of $$' on women to have a relationship...with hookers or with your wife, as you've described...must be used by all other men. Or that you believe that's what they do.

Most men have no problems having a relationship, even while dating, without spending 'tons of $$.'

If you have to 'spend tons of $$' to have a relationship:

A) she's not worth your time (and you deserve what you get if you dont dump her)
B) you are a loser using the wrong methods and social skills to meet and get to know a woman
 
Back
Top Bottom