Re: What Is Wrong with "slut shaming"?
which is a crime regardless your claim was the democrats hold people to higher standards, this is blatantly not true - etc.
Cohen was the one who paid so Trump is in the clear? You must know that Cohen was just the envoy. LOL. How different is that from "I didn't have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky" because he allegedly thought that sex didn't include oral sex? The only difference: being under oath.
Yeah, you have a point about winning the discussion regarding the hypocrisy and the standards in both parties. Maybe you are right and the Dems don't have higher standards. They are all hypocrites, which is why I'm actually an independent, I refused to register with either party because I think they are all crooks.
I don't want to engage in a long discussion about Trump's impeachment, I've mentioned it elsewhere, but just briefly, I've posted elsewhere the link to the real timeline when we're not influenced by conspiracy theories. Burisma was investigated for corruption between 2010 and 2012, for a totally unrelated matter having to do with permits issued by the Ministry of Ecology. That investigation ended on a plea agreement. TWO YEARS LATER Hunter Biden joined Burisma in 2014. Burisma was NOT under investigation by the fired prosecutor AT THE TIME of Joe Biden's interference, and Joe Biden's did it at Obama's request (don't shoot the messenger) and Obama did it at the request of the Brits, the European Union, and the International Monetary Fund who all wanted the prosecutor out, not for investigating Burisma (which wasn't happening at the time), but for NOT investigation other cases of corruption. Biden bragged about pressuring Ukraine to fire him under Obama's orders, but that's NOT corruption and NOT illegal as Biden had NO personal gain in the matter, given that the situation AT THE TIME was completely and thoroughly unrelated to Burisma, unlike conspiracy theorists try to affirm. It is not illegal for the US president or his envoys to pressure foreign governments and offer quid-pro-quos using our foreign aid. It's done all the time. What is illegal is to do it for PERSONAL gain which wasn't Biden's case (but was Trump's case). That video with Biden has absolutely NOTHING illegal in it, as any good lawyer with knowledge of these matters will tell you. Now, Trump on the other hand, knowing that an investigation would actually exonerate Biden, only wanted Zelensky to ANNOUNCE an investigation in order to smear his political opponent. Ample testimony has established that Trump didn't ACTUALLY want an investigation, that is, couldn't care less if there was corruption (Trump, a corrupt man himself, doesn't mind corruption; the thrives in corruption; he considers corruption as a business opportunity); he only wanted the APPEARANCE of an investigation in order to score points against Biden. This is an OBVIOUS violation of US electoral law, and yes, it is an impeachable offense.
Another person with similar ideology as compared to you, asked me to substantiate what I was saying... I posted the link to the real timeline... and he then plain REFUSED TO READ THE ARTICLE!!! You guys don't WANT to know the truth, you just want to be able to continue to bitch and complain about Biden's supposed corruption. Biden is in politics for decades and has always been the US senator with the smallest net worth. He never got rich from politics. Biden is NOT corrupt. I'll accept charges that Biden is too demented to be the president as his mind indeed doesn't seem sharp in debates, but the charge that he is corrupt is false, and is a lie similar to the Swift Boat lies told against Kerry. These conspiracy theories are merely electoral tactics. Smearing Biden is good for Republican business so they'll keep doing it, but it doesn't make it any less true.
I'm so frustrated with it, that I don't really want to keep discussing it. I know you'll have all sorts of (baseless) arguments to counter that, and sorry, I've discussed it enough elsewhere and I won't respond to this any further; actually I have to run some errands, so, see you later. I will continue to respond later about the "slut shaming" part but the merits of Trump's impeachment and the conspiracy theory that Biden is corrupt are becoming very tiresome; I'm sick and tired of these discussions which go round and round and people never pay attention to the actual timeline which is what I just told you (or willingly refuse to look into it, which I find quite shameful).
See you later. Carry on. I actually like to discuss with you (thus my willing to contribute to your dating advice threads). And I have no problem acknowledging when you're right (like with the higher or equal standards part above). So, it's not you, it's the topic. This Biden-Ukraine stuff is very frustrating. I wish we coud do politics without having to lie about candidates in blatant conspiracy theories.