• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How to argue for feminism

You decry feminism as a supremacist movement and then whine about hyperbole?

How sophomoric.

I'm simply telling you how it's sometimes framed. Heck, the piece you cited spoke of women in glowing terms, as more closely connected to "Nature" or some such New Age Drivel.

I've heard some women--and even a man or two--suggest that all we need is a woman president, and virtually all our problems would be solved. I usually respond by asking how they'd react if they woke up tomorrow to find Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin as president.

That usually works.
 
I'm simply telling you how it's sometimes framed.

No, that's how you framed it. That's how sissy little victim boys frame it, and how you framed it.
 
Ah, yes. "Mainsplain". The fallback, default response given nowadays whenever a man has the gall to disagree with a woman about virtually anything where the subject is gender politics.

I don't know your age; but I'm old enough to clearly remember when the modern feminist movement got underway in the Seventies......yet young enough to still be closely in touch with how the issue is advanced and debated currently.

Now: can you actually substantively respond to anything I've said......or are you just going to throw out the same, tired old knee-jerk default responses whenever a man has the gall to disagree with you?

Someone doesn't like to know when they are mansplaining, I guess.

Can you substantively explain then how exactly mainstream feminism now implies gender superiority?
 
OP looks like a Youtuber who is trying to get people to watch his videos. I doubt he believes what he's pitching.
 
Someone doesn't like to know when they are mansplaining, I guess.

Can you substantively explain then how exactly mainstream feminism now implies gender superiority?

The solution to men mansplaining: Don't explain your actions. When some woman asks you why you're suing her, just shrug. That way you're not mansplaining.
 
Exactly: Incel-ness is a social problem to be taken seriously. Maybe some Mexican ***** could have stopped the El Paso shooter from committing his crime. As a society we can do better for our young men.

I think the hyper importance put on getting laid is the reason why we have a such thing as incels
 
Well, if you're not going to actually watch the video, how do you know what he's really saying?

We are not required to digest crap to know it's crap. :)
 
I think the hyper importance put on getting laid is the reason why we have a such thing as incels

No, incelism exist because some males turn into whiny little bitches when they don't get sex whenever they want with whomever they want.
 
So do you think getting laid will cure them?

Of course it won't. I've been through dry spells before and I didn't turn to a life of blaming women. Instead, I looked for ways to improve myself, put myself out there, and learned to handle rejection with grace.

These are three things that the incel community actively discourages. That's right, if one of their own suggests to try to become a better man, he is shot down with defeatist replies.
 
Of course it won't.
then you're not really arguing against my point.
I've been through dry spells before and I didn't turn to a life of blaming women. Instead, I looked for ways to improve myself, put myself out there, and learned to handle rejection with grace.

These are three things that the incel community actively discourages. That's right, if one of their own suggests to try to become a better man, he is shot down with defeatist replies.
I still think the only reason they exist is because of the hyper importance put on getting laid.
 
I think the hyper importance put on getting laid is the reason why we have a such thing as incels

I disagree. In my opinion, it's laziness. If it's REALLY that important, a guy can make it happen. In my case, it's caused me to work my ass off by learning two foreign languages and pulling down a good income. Sex motivates me. My earliest discovery was back college some chick picked up on me being a serious student. She got on group projects with me and figured out that I would do all her work for her and even tutor her point by point if she missed class in exchange for twice a week sex.

From what I see nowadays, guys are so cucked out that they would do the same thing for a chance at sex that never actually materializes.
 
I disagree. In my opinion, it's laziness. If it's REALLY that important, a guy can make it happen. In my case, it's caused me to work my ass off by learning two foreign languages and pulling down a good income. Sex motivates me. My earliest discovery was back college some chick picked up on me being a serious student. She got on group projects with me and figured out that I would do all her work for her and even tutor her point by point if she missed class in exchange for twice a week sex.

From what I see nowadays, guys are so cucked out that they would do the same thing for a chance at sex that never actually materializes.

I disagree I think the obsession with it causes incels. We never had a term for this before in our culture because we weren't as hedonistic as we are now.
 
Of course it won't. I've been through dry spells before and I didn't turn to a life of blaming women. Instead, I looked for ways to improve myself, put myself out there, and learned to handle rejection with grace.

These are three things that the incel community actively discourages. That's right, if one of their own suggests to try to become a better man, he is shot down with defeatist replies.

The rejection boils down to what you have invested. I like the fairmindedness of Latinas. A number of times I was offered sex upfront to get the tension and apprehension out of the way. I responded by going above and beyond. They are smart enough to know some men have a "cut your losses" mentality. Having sex upfront vaporizes such a mentality.
 
Someone doesn't like to know when they are mansplaining, I guess.

Can you substantively explain then how exactly mainstream feminism now implies gender superiority?

I don't think it's a routine practice. I'm simply reiterating a number of anecdotes I've heard. You can choose to believe me or not.
 
Isn't feminism a critique of masculinity ?

It is basically a reactionary movement with nothing positive to say.
 
Back
Top Bottom