• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deranged leftist PC child abuse

Is there one of these with the mother's side of the story? What I saw in there was, assuming that everything the father said about the mother was true, this kid would be no better off with him. It's a damned shame that any kid should be put in the middle of a mess like that.

From what I've read the mother never took the stand. You're right about kids being in the middle.
 
I consider "CIS" to be offensive. I will accept non-transgendered. I'm going to invoke my right not to be offended from the living, breathing constitution.

CIS only means that most of us are not transgendered and there needed to be a term to different us from those who are non-binary or transgendered.

Gender doesn't change from birth. They were born transgendered because out gender identity is determined before the 15th week of gestation. They are simply addressing the gender incongruency that made their biological gender different from their psychological gender identity.
 
I consider "CIS" to be offensive. I will accept non-transgendered. I'm going to invoke my right not to be offended from the living, breathing constitution.

How is CIS offensive to you or anyone else? Is heterosexual also offensive and would you prefer to be called non-gay instead?

You don't have the right not to be offended because others have free speech rights. haste speech is protected in the US until it becomes a legitimate and imminent threat to a person. Facts have never been considered to be a threat.
 
I can understand that people are 'transgendered' - confused by where along the male/female spectrum they fall. For example, it may be that one is biologically a man, but thinks they are a woman. This "man that thinks they are a woman" is what they actually are, and I have no issue with that. However, they are not a woman, and any attempt to 'transition' to a woman (which is impossible) is superficial at best, and moves them towards 'not what they are'. Wishing to be what you do not seem to indicate a deep-rooted mental issue.

By society telling people that Bruce Jenner is actually a woman, this is a lie, and very unhealthy for those people that are transgender.
Put yourself in their shoes and imagine what you would feel like if you woke up tomorrow with a completely female body, were married to a man and people telling you that you must act and behave as a female, despite the fact that emotionally you were the same as you know. You would be miserable because what people saw what not who you are. Do that for 20-30 years and you understand why the depression, anxiety, and the suicide rate is so high for transgender people. Then you can add in the physical and emotional abuse and bullying that they experience at the hands of others. PTSD is rampant in the trans community and it is seldom properly treated because most people don't think to look or ask due to the fact that PTSD is only commonly screened for in veterans and first responders.

You think that what I am telling you is absurd but this is what life is like for people who are trans and were not able to express their feelings as children so they were forced to hide it, even from their own family, to be safe. They are trapped in the wrong body and are desperate to be able to live and express themselves in their proper gender personality, even if the solution that is offered is for from optimal.
Psychologically trans people are the personality and emotionally their identified gender. This has been proven by MRIs and psychological testing. The problem lies in the fact that medical science has very limited tools to align their physical body with their psychological gender identity and those options are less as the p[erson matures in their late teens and twenties. The person's DNA cannot change, so the tools are superficial to give the person a sense of contentment in the body that they have. The tools that are available are hormones/ hormone blockers and then various surgeries. Trans people would love to be able to change their DNA but medically that is not possible with current technology. The gender surgery for female to male transmen is far less developed than trans females. I know that there is some research being conducted to allow transgender females to become pregnant and give birth in the future.

The outcome is much better for trans people when the process starts before puberty because they do not have to unlearn wrong gender behavior and their body never physically matures in the wrong gender when both blockers and then hormones are administered at the same time their CIS peers are going through puberty. They have the same outcome after surgery at 17-18 as their peers if they are given healthy support in a positive atmosphere.

Caitlyn tried to be a man because he was told as a child that is what he was. The problem is that what people saw what not what Caitlyn experienced emotionally. He was very masculine and from what I know he was miserable when he was a male. He finally admitted that he was female and was diagnosed as transgendered in the early 2000s.
 
What is a "Theyby?"

A child whose leftist liberal dummass parents refuse to allow the state to assign it a gender until it grows up old enough to make its own decision. It is a real trend among deranged leftists.

It's a Theyby! Is it possible to raise your child entirely without gender from birth? Some parents are trying.

Raising Gender Creative Children

View attachment 67266886

This controversy is not caused by leftists but quite the opposite: it is caused by corrupt judges making bizarre decisions to open markets and benefit only the rich
 
This controversy is not caused by leftists but quite the opposite: it is caused by corrupt judges making bizarre decisions to open markets and benefit only the rich

It must seem horrible to democrats in America that there are so many rich people here who hide the fact that they are democrats who lobby Congress to pass laws favorable to democrats..
 
It must seem horrible to democrats in America that there are so many rich people here who hide the fact that they are democrats who lobby Congress to pass laws favorable to democrats..

What the heck?
 
Indeed. The post makes no sense.

I read it more than three times and move the phrasing around to try to create a coherent thought but there isn't a coherent thought to be created.
 
This controversy is not caused by leftists but quite the opposite: it is caused by corrupt judges making bizarre decisions to open markets and benefit only the rich

You are right. That is bizarre.
 
It must seem horrible to democrats in America that there are so many rich people here who hide the fact that they are democrats who lobby Congress to pass laws favorable to democrats..

Why ? Details , please.
 
That's what I want from all those claiming rich people in America are causing America to lose its greatness. Details and facts.

strawman/deflection....dismissed
 
That's what I want from all those claiming rich people in America are causing America to lose its greatness. Details and facts.

Who is saying that because I've never heard rich people being blamed for our loss of greatness?
 
Details and facts about all those claiming rich people in America are causing America to lose its greatness. Names please.
 
Who is saying that because I've never heard rich people being blamed for our loss of greatness?

Is it true that rich democrats and republicans are behind policies which favor the rich and which reportedly result in oppressive damage to the poor?
 
Inquiring minds want to know

Is it true that rich democrats and republicans are behind policies which favor the rich and which reportedly result in oppressive damage to the poor?

Interesting. Is there such a thing as liberating damage?
 
Is it true that rich democrats and republicans are behind policies that favor the rich and which reportedly result in oppressive damage to the poor?

Those policies are driven by their wealth and not by the fact that they might be democrats. Why did you ignore the fact that those same policy goals are also driven by republicans?
 
Nobody can make someone transgendered, just as no one can convince you that you are LGB. How exactly does a parent feed a child or a teen this idea when most parents are not aware of it?

James Younger's mother isn't "most parents"; she's a pediatrician. And she wanted to "socially transition" her son now rather than the continued "watchful waiting" that James's father wanted.
 
James Younger's mother isn't "most parents"; she's a pediatrician. And she wanted to "socially transition" her son now rather than the continued "watchful waiting" that James's father wanted.

How do you socially transition a child? I want to know the steps that you are being told happens and where you are getting this information from?
 
Re: Inquiring minds want to know

What if the case of James Jounger is a montage of Republicans to let the Democrats look bad for their bond with the left, which in turn keeps a link with feminism, and which in turn keeps a link with feminism Nazi? What if this controversy is orchestrated from the shadows of the abyss?
 
It is glaringly obvious that you have never spent time on a college campus. Professors keep their religious beliefs to themselves, even in the seminary. College is to teach you to think for yourself in a logical manner, and not to parrot what you have been told or read.

"Professors keep their religious beliefs to themselves, even in the seminary".

I'm trying to let that sink in.
 
What has happened recently that all the cons are suddenly clutching their pearls about transgender people? Is it what Hannity is talking about so hw doesn't have to think about Trump?

How is it child abuse to let a child be themselves? Are you scared that if we let people be free they might rebel against one party rule by Republicans?

Supporting delusions is not healthy. We don’t do it with any others, like body image problems or even delusions of grandeur.

Progressives have been throwing a hissy fit since FDR at any perceived threat to their rotten Deal. One party rule? What?
 
Back
Top Bottom