• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

1 in 16 U.S. women say first sexual experience was rape in their teen years

Then why did you write that you thought we agreed?

Because you said something I agreed with, namely "And by definition, minors cannot consent (it's against their will)."

Then you said something I disagree with, specifically, "So then such acts are considered rape and included in the study." Such acts are considered statutory rape and I've seen no evidence they are included in the study. If you have any, please share.
 
Who said "threatened"? The study just says "verbally pressured". Not the same thing.

Very much the same thing! Were you there when the men said "Pretty Please" to "verbally pressure" girls into unwanted sex?
 
Very much the same thing! Were you there when the men said "Pretty Please" to "verbally pressure" girls into unwanted sex?

Woah, Nelly! Come on, my friend, surely you see this is argument is not only self-defeating but destructive.

It's self-defeating because you weren't there, either. Both sides are arguing from the same data, so you have no grounds to claim special knowledge of what happened in these encounters.

It's destructive because it removes all benefit of the doubt. "Verbal pressure" is a vast sea of gray. I think we all can agree there's a huge ethical and moral difference "pretty please" and "sex me or else." The fact is, we can't make reasonable conclusions about the severity of the study participants' behavior without more information.

But I know this -- there might not be a married soul on this earth who hasn't had sex when they didn't really want to, so if we set our snares too wide, we'll trap everyone.
 
Very much the same thing! Were you there when the men said "Pretty Please" to "verbally pressure" girls into unwanted sex?

LOL. I've been that guy saying "pretty please". Multiple times. So has every other heterosexual male on the planet. Men beg for sex.

Still not rape.
 
Woah, Nelly! Come on, my friend, surely you see this is argument is not only self-defeating but destructive.

It's self-defeating because you weren't there, either. Both sides are arguing from the same data, so you have no grounds to claim special knowledge of what happened in these encounters.

It's destructive because it removes all benefit of the doubt. "Verbal pressure" is a vast sea of gray. I think we all can agree there's a huge ethical and moral difference "pretty please" and "sex me or else." The fact is, we can't make reasonable conclusions about the severity of the study participants' behavior without more information.

But I know this -- there might not be a married soul on this earth who hasn't had sex when they didn't really want to, so if we set our snares too wide, we'll trap everyone.

It's worth noting again that this study "relied on a national survey that didn't use the word [rape] in asking women about forced sex." In other words, the women that this study says were raped did not themselves say that.
 
Too many liberals define rape as stuff that isn't rape.

How many conservatives define rape that isn't rape ?

How many people who support a one party state with a command economy and communist collectivization believe it ?


Why do you think that an economic leaning would change your views on what is rape ?



Btw - give an (still living please) example of who you consider a liberal and who you regard as a conservative.
 
Because you said something I agreed with, namely "And by definition, minors cannot consent (it's against their will)."

Then you said something I disagree with, specifically, "So then such acts are considered rape and included in the study." Such acts are considered statutory rape and I've seen no evidence they are included in the study. If you have any, please share.

They didnt exclude it and 'teen years' still includes 18/19 yr olds.
 
LOL. I've been that guy saying "pretty please". Multiple times. So has every other heterosexual male on the planet. Men beg for sex.

Still not rape.
And if men werent so focused on doing anything for sex they would have to worry a whole lot less about women falsely accusing them.
 
They didnt exclude it and 'teen years' still includes 18/19 yr olds.

Unlawful sex is often regarded as rape.

eg: if a teacher has sex with a pupil in his class he/she is charged with rape.

It doesn't matter whether it was consensual or not.
 
Unlawful sex is often regarded as rape.

eg: if a teacher has sex with a pupil in his class he/she is charged with rape.

It doesn't matter whether it was consensual or not.

I know.
 
How many conservatives define rape that isn't rape ?

How many people who support a one party state with a command economy and communist collectivization believe it ?


Why do you think that an economic leaning would change your views on what is rape ?



Btw - give an (still living please) example of who you consider a liberal and who you regard as a conservative.

"Liberal" is a political and ideological, not an economic leaning.
 
They didnt exclude it and 'teen years' still includes 18/19 yr olds.

Do you have evidence that the study did not exclude statutory rape sex where force or verbal pressure was not involved? Because the quote in the article is quite clear that its definition involved force or verbal pressure.
 
And if men werent so focused on doing anything for sex they would have to worry a whole lot less about women falsely accusing them.

Men don't do "anything" for sex. But men usually have a stronger biological urge for sex than women. It's how we evolved. Probably it's part of the reason why we're running the planet and not the Neanderthals.

And the only one falsely accusing men of rape here seems to be Dr. Laura Hawks, an internist and Harvard Medical School researcher. You can't blame men for that. That's all on her.
 
Men don't do "anything" for sex. But men usually have a stronger biological urge for sex than women. It's how we evolved. Probably it's part of the reason why we're running the planet and not the Neanderthals.

And the only one falsely accusing men of rape here seems to be Dr. Laura Hawks, an internist and Harvard Medical School researcher. You can't blame men for that. That's all on her.

Yes...men have demonstrably done anything and everything imaginable to get sex. How can you even debate that?

and I saw no false accusations in the article.
 
Do you have evidence that the study did not exclude statutory rape sex where force or verbal pressure was not involved? Because the quote in the article is quite clear that its definition involved force or verbal pressure.

It didnt go into that detail for any of the statements. You'd need to see the data.

Being aware of 'reality,' I dont exclude it at all...but the proof would be in the data.
 
"Liberal" is a political and ideological, not an economic leaning.

I am a liberal and I have liberal political and economic beliefs.

So you're wrong - how does that not surprise us ?

But hey don't take my word for it:


Economic liberalism - Wikiquote

The "new liberal economics" is the key to understanding Hillary Clinton's policies - Vox




Anyway the question remains unanswered. just focus on the top line if you want: "How many conservatives define rape that isn't rape' ?
 
Yes...men have demonstrably done anything and everything imaginable to get sex. How can you even debate that?

and I saw no false accusations in the article.

Not all men. And the article calls acts rape that the women involved did not say were rape. That's the definition of a false accusation.
 
It didnt go into that detail for any of the statements. You'd need to see the data.

Being aware of 'reality,' I dont exclude it at all...but the proof would be in the data.

So you don't know either.
 
Not all men. And the article calls acts rape that the women involved did not say were rape. That's the definition of a false accusation.

Please, it's ludicrous to quibble over how many men. :roll:

And we're back to: a teen girl may not consider it rape but that doesnt mean it's not statutory rape.

I'm tired of the circles. Either refer to actual data or desist. At least I'm basing my speculation on reality and not defensiveness over how this threatens some males.
 
1 in 16 U.S. women say first sexual experience was rape in their teen years

I don't know why some researchers try to inflate rape statistics like this. Rape is bad enough and I think rapists should be locked up for life. But this study defines rape as follows: "Any sexual encounter (with penetration) that occurs against somebody's will is rape. If somebody is verbally pressured into having sex, it's just as much rape."

WTF? Verbally pressuring someone into having sex is "rape"? No. It's. Not. If that's the definition of rape, then about half of my sexual encounters were rapes.

Why does Dr. Laura Hawks, an internist and Harvard Medical School researcher think otherwise? Does she think she's helping women or men by inflating the number of rapes? Is she not worried that including stuff that is not rape won't dilute the word and make it lose its power?

How many young men and women are being taught this in schools as if it was reality? Boys are told that they are potential rapists and girls are told that every sexual encounter that they don't initiate is a rape. Yeah, that'll make for a healthy society.

It's worth noting that the study, "relied on a national survey that didn't use the word in asking women about forced sex." So the women who were questioned didn't say they were raped. That's just Dr. Laura Hawks, an internist and Harvard Medical School researcher, calling it that. Make sure you remember that name.

Join us in the present...no means no.
 
That was more a negotiation. Will you love me forever?
 
This is the age in which some women will say that being cat called is equivalent to sexual assault. The Metoo movement has turned into a fetid joke at this point.

An unwanted sexual advance is assault. What is a cat call? An unwanted sexual advance.
 
Somebody coercing someone into having sexual intercourse, can certainly constitute as rape, provided that there's threats involved, and/or there's a person in a high position of power that's abusing their authority.

But I don't think 1/16 women in the U.S have had that experience. I think that's a bit of a ridiculously high number.

Your thoughts can't compare to data gathered in research.
 
I can't agree agree or disagree with this statement, because I have no idea what you would consider to be "coercion." So let's take two specific examples:

1. A man and his wife haven't had sex in a while. The man says, "If you won't have sex with me, I'm going to the massage parlor." The woman relents. Is that rape?

2. Two teens are making out in a car. The boy says, "I'm not ready to go all the way." The girl says, "It's not fair to leave me hanging like this. At least use your hand or I'll tell everyone you can't get it up." He relents. Is that rape?

Ask the person that didn't want to have sex.
 
Back
Top Bottom