• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Juggling Cats And Chainsaws - man married to a Western wah-man

SDET

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
7,802
Reaction score
1,610
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Another hit from Terrence Popp.

 
Definition of a nymphomaniac: Someone who gets more sex than you
 
A good way to be an incel is to be: Over Nice, Under Laid



Being nasty and aggressive with a woman is a good way of being arrested for sexual assault, despite what your incel leaders are telling you. Men do not own women, we owe you nothing and we dont need a reason to not go out with you or say no to romance. Incels are entitled jerks who cannot deal with a women as equals.
 
Last I checked, keeping one's money in one's pocket and refusing to spend effort without getting something in return doesn't fit any reasonable person's definition of assault. So where exactly in the video does he suggest getting aggressive with women? Is it OK for women to be nasty and aggressive towards men?

Being nasty and aggressive with a woman is a good way of being arrested for sexual assault, despite what your incel leaders are telling you. Men do not own women, we owe you nothing and we dont need a reason to not go out with you or say no to romance. Incels are entitled jerks who cannot deal with a women as equals.
 
Last edited:
Being nasty and aggressive with a woman is a good way of being arrested for sexual assault, despite what your incel leaders are telling you. Men do not own women, we owe you nothing and we dont need a reason to not go out with you or say no to romance. Incels are entitled jerks who cannot deal with a women as equals.

He is a hardcore, flag-waving misogynist. He pays women to let him do whatever he wants to them and he's proud of it. He can't be insulted by people calling him like he is. He's proud of his degenerate, relation-free life.

He speaks a completely different language from you and me.
 
Last I checked, keeping one's money in one's pocket and refusing to spend effort without getting something in return doesn't fit any reasonable person's definition of assault. So where exactly in the video does he suggest getting aggressive with women? Is it OK for women to be nasty and aggressive towards men?

Paying for drinks or dinner does not entitle you to sex in return. She is a date and not your sex toy or your pet.

It seems that you have a problem with women as equal to you. You expect her to be subservient to you because you have a penis.
 
If a woman is so equal, let her pay half the bill. Also, let her carry her own damn stuff.

Paying for drinks or dinner does not entitle you to sex in return. She is a date and not your sex toy or your pet.

It seems that you have a problem with women as equal to you. You expect her to be subservient to you because you have a penis.
 
If a woman is so equal, let her pay half the bill. Also, let her carry her own damn stuff.

Do you not understand being a gentleman?

What stuff is she expecting you to carry?
 
Paying for drinks or dinner does not entitle you to sex in return. She is a date and not your sex toy or your pet.

It seems that you have a problem with women as equal to you. You expect her to be subservient to you because you have a penis.


He goes on sex tours in poor countries. He's not paying for drinks and dinner. He's literally paying for sex. That's who you're talking to. He's a brick wall -- your standards of decency mean less than nothing to him. I'm telling you this to try to save you a headache.
 
He goes on sex tours in poor countries. He's not paying for drinks and dinner. He's literally paying for sex. That's who you're talking to. He's a brick wall -- your standards of decency mean less than nothing to him. I'm telling you this to try to save you a headache.

OMG! Sex tourists should be labeled as sexual predators because they seek undeveloped counties where the laws aren't as strict.
 
"Gentleman" = sucker. How to not be frustrated: Don't ante-up to her game.

Do you not understand being a gentleman?

What stuff is she expecting you to carry?
 
OMG! Sex tourists should be labeled as sexual predators because they seek undeveloped counties where the laws aren't as strict.

Yes.

But you won't get any satisfaction from SDET over this. He has zero shame. It does not appear to be an act with him. He may be the most pure misogynist I have ever encountered. Trying to argue with him or trying to get him to feel a glimmer of compunction is a case study in "Don't wrestle with a pig. You both get muddy and the pig enjoys it."
 
Yes.

But you won't get any satisfaction from SDET over this. He has zero shame. It does not appear to be an act with him. He may be the most pure misogynist I have ever encountered. Trying to argue with him or trying to get him to feel a glimmer of compunction is a case study in "Don't wrestle with a pig. You both get muddy and the pig enjoys it."

I know the type. There was a guy on a previous political forum who might have assaulted his mother and ran to Japan to hide from American authorities under an alias. He claimed to teach English to Japanese students and has a Japanese teen mistress and a wife and family. He made my skin crawl.
 
I know the type. There was a guy on a previous political forum who might have assaulted his mother and ran to Japan to hide from American authorities under an alias. He claimed to teach English to Japanese students and has a Japanese teen mistress and a wife and family. He made my skin crawl.

Yes.

Can't "like" that. But yes. Just so you know where you stand. I know you're still trying to find your way around ... so I figured I'd point out that this is one of those "only way to win is quit" situations.

Later.
 
Yes.

Can't "like" that. But yes. Just so you know where you stand. I know you're still trying to find your way around ... so I figured I'd point out that this is one of those "only way to win is quit" situations.

Later.

Thanks for the heads up.
 
"Gentleman" = sucker. How to not be frustrated: Don't ante-up to her game.

Class and manners still matter to many people. I would not date an obnoxious jerk who didn't understand manners and tact.
 
Another hit from Terrence Popp.



You really need another outlet for your fear and hatred of women. Find a forum full of weak manbabies who can't live in a world where women are equals and spew your misogynistic claptrap there.
 
You really need another outlet for your fear and hatred of women. Find a forum full of weak manbabies who can't live in a world where women are equals and spew your misogynistic claptrap there.

He must have deeply concealed issues about women, possibly dating back to his childhood.
 
He must have deeply concealed issues about women, possibly dating back to his childhood.

The fact that he opens a new thread nearly every week to expose his fear and anger really says something about him.
 
The fact that he opens a new thread nearly every week to expose his fear and anger really says something about him.

He starts a few political threads too

His personal "demons" have caused him to nail his colors to the mast...or maybe it's just a cry for attention ?
 
Nah, I just see seemingly countless men in the cubical farm tell the same story. It never ceases to amaze me how much crap American men sign up for. It's not only on the personal level, but at the corporate level too that so many don't understand that one gets what on tolerates. I'm not sure which is worse: Falling on a sword to please a demanding impossible to please woman or working uncompensated overtime to please a demanding impossible to please boss. I can't wrap my mind around why American men don't understand the power of "NO". The main reason a man shouldn't want his wife to work outside the home is that she will absorb the corporate mentality/culture.

He starts a few political threads too

His personal "demons" have caused him to nail his colors to the mast...or maybe it's just a cry for attention ?
 
...it never ceases to amaze me how much crap American men sign up for. It's not only on the personal level, but at the corporate level too that so many don't understand that one gets what on tolerates....

Not at all, we tolerate freedom of speech in the USA and same sex marriage....that means we expect to see it/them exercised

...I'm not sure which is worse: Falling on a sword to please a demanding impossible to please woman or working uncompensated overtime to please a demanding impossible to please boss....


Ah now here we have it. You're a weak man who was in a relationship with a woman who bullied you into doing things you didn't want to do

And you worked for a boss who made demands that were too taxing for you.

How about you work for a female boss and learn how to "up your game" a bit ?

...the main reason a man shouldn't want his wife to work outside the home is that she will absorb the corporate mentality/culture.


OMG

A total sexist is revealed - perish the thought a woman going out to work to increase the family income got strange ideas and even absorbed a few !!!
 
Back
Top Bottom