• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Self Identification Demands Placed On Others

It does not.

Then how do you explain post# 394

"though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room..."


Sounds like you think vagina possession was definitely a deciding if not the deciding factor.
 
Then how do you explain post# 394

"though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room..."

Sounds like you think vagina possession was definitely a deciding if not the deciding factor.

No, as I said "man" is the deciding factor. The genitalia is irrelevant. Perhaps you missed the conversation that led to this post?

"What is the recourse for the woman who is offended by the penis of the woman next to her?"

lwf said:
"The recourse is the same for her as it is for the woman who is offended by the vagina of the woman in the stall next to her."

"Or, more appropriately to this discussion, the vagina of the man next to her."

lwf said:
"Yes, either case, though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room. If you are offended by someone else's body, you have no recourse, and you shouldn't have any recourse because the problem is with you, not with them. You don't have the right to bar a fat man from using the stall next to you based on your personal offense at his body, and neither should you have the right to deny a trans-man from using the stall next to you based on the appearance of his genitalia."

If you didn't miss this, then I'm not sure what your point is.
 
Consumed with what? Apparently you're interested in trying to understand the transgender phenomenon. I'm just trying to help you.

Your efforts are accepted for what they are.
 
Handsomeness is a value judgement. You might be handsome to some people. Also you can improve your looks. People do it all the time with exercising, dieting, make ups, botox, plastic surgery, and such. So it's possible for you to make yourself handsomier.

Great advice.
 
Society generally gets more liberal as ideas, one they establish a foothold" gain acceptance.

And that explains where and how society has moved over the last several millennia?

You may want to include wealth as another metric in your views.

When people are not starving, it changes how they view everything.
 
Yes, either case, though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room. If you are offended by someone else's body, you have no recourse, and you shouldn't have any recourse because the problem is with you, not with them. You don't have the right to bar a fat man from using the stall next to you based on your personal offense at his body, and neither should you have the right to deny a trans-man from using the stall next to you based on the appearance of his genitalia.

Your post is ridiculous on every level.
 
No, as I said "man" is the deciding factor. The genitalia is irrelevant. Perhaps you missed the conversation that led to this post?

So the man with a vagina still retain the decision on which bathroom to use ?


Post# 394 seems to take the decision away when you said:

"though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room...""



So regardless of anatomy, the man should use the men's room
And conversely, the woman with the penis should use the women's ?
 
So the man with a vagina still retain the decision on which bathroom to use ?


Post# 394 seems to take the decision away when you said:

"though the man with the vagina should be in the men's room...""



So regardless of anatomy, the man should use the men's room
And conversely, the woman with the penis should use the women's ?

Ask him.

buckangel11_7326d.jpg
 
And that explains where and how society has moved over the last several millennia?

You may want to include wealth as another metric in your views.

When people are not starving, it changes how they view everything.


Are you arguing to reintroduce starvation as a way of bringing common public views to be more in line with your own ?
 
I was quoting lwf.

Yeah. I was being kinda cheeky. That guy would be a good example that anti-trans people would ironically not want him to be in a woman's bathroom.
 
Yeah. I was being kinda cheeky. That guy would be a good example that anti-trans people would ironically not want him to be in a woman's bathroom.

I'm not sure if I'd want him next to me in the men's room either...
 
You've not heard of the "Willy watchers" then

Men who use public toilet urinals with their head turned sideways.

Had to look that up.

You have a problem with women staring at your thang? Lol.
 
Are you arguing to reintroduce starvation as a way of bringing common public views to be more in line with your own ?

Since you have no idea what my views are, why don't you tell me what you feel my views are.
 
Since you have no idea what my views are, why don't you tell me what you feel my views are.

It was a question and secondly no suggestion was made as to what your private views are...other to suggest they're not commonly held


I guess we can determine your reading skills are deficient though.
 
It was a question and secondly no suggestion was made as to what your private views are...other to suggest they're not commonly held


I guess we can determine your reading skills are deficient though.

Coming from you, that means very little.
 
Yeah well a lot of factual things mean "very little" to you

Actually anything your bigoted mind and indoctrination can't agree with.

There he is.
 
Back
Top Bottom