[/B][/COLOR]
Your words would be a comfort except that they are empty, inaccurate and misleading.
One of the various aims of the liberal elite is to force the general public to accept and support obvious fantasy as factual truth using penalty of law.
Was this abuse of reason and sanity defined for us in the civics classes now suspended by the Liberal Elites?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...onoun-they-demand-that-you-use/?noredirect=on
<snip>
What’s more, according to the City, “refusal to use a transgender employee’s preferred name, pronoun, or title
may constitute unlawful gender-based harassment.”
The label “harassment” is important here because
harassment law requires employers and businesses to prevent harassment by co-workers and patrons and not just by themselves or their own employees;
this is particularly well established for harassment by co-workers, but it has also been accepted for harassment by fellow patrons.
So an employer or business that learns that its employees or patrons are “refus[ing] to use a transgender employee’s preferred” pronoun or title
would have to threaten to
fire or eject such people unless they comply with the City’s demands.
(The logic would also apply to landlords having to threaten to eject tenants who refuse to use co-tenants’ preferred pronouns or titles, but that’s less certain.)
<snip>
...the government as sovereign, threatening “civil penalties up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct” if people don’t speak the way the government tells them to speak.
<snip>
