• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When it comes to pu**y, which is worse

Conyers and Franken aren't in office anymore. :roll:

Conyers resigned on the allegations alone. Franklin only pretended to "go after the sex organs" hamming for the camera, yet both were ejected by a party with principles. Repubs will brag about real offences and be applauded and elected! Which is worse indeed!
 
Conyers resigned on the allegations alone. Franklin only pretended to "go after the sex organs" hamming for the camera, yet both were ejected by a party with principles. Repubs will brag about real offences and be applauded and elected! Which is worse indeed!

Absolutely. What continues to amaze me, despite the fact that it shouldn't, is that Republicans would have a better argument if they would just say that such behavior is not a big deal to them. I would still find it revolting and typical of the party they've fashioned for themselves, but at least it would give an appearance of honesty. Instead, they rationalize bad behavior amongst themselves while condemning bad behavior amongst their political adversaries at the same time that they call Democrats hypocrites about it all. They care so little about their credibility that they resort to arguments that in fact make them look even more inept than the simple truth would. It's nuts.

P.S. What have you eaten that's served in a bucket? I can only think of discounted domestic bottles of beer on football game days and agree that yes, one should never drink that swill.
 
Absolutely. What continues to amaze me, despite the fact that it shouldn't, is that Republicans would have a better argument if they would just say that such behavior is not a big deal to them. I would still find it revolting and typical of the party they've fashioned for themselves, but at least it would give an appearance of honesty. Instead, they rationalize bad behavior amongst themselves while condemning bad behavior amongst their political adversaries at the same time that they call Democrats hypocrites about it all. They care so little about their credibility that they resort to arguments that in fact make them look even more inept than the simple truth would. It's nuts.

P.S. What have you eaten that's served in a bucket? I can only think of discounted domestic bottles of beer on football game days and agree that yes, one should never drink that swill.

Tastes like chicken!
 
Out of interest, what do you consider a "perverted" act specifically ?

If I recall from a different thread correctly, he thinks that any sex act that is not vaginal intercourse between a heterosexual married couple is perverted/immoral. But he can answer for himself. I don't get much value from talking to people that share his opinions, but I gave it a good shot recently.
 
If I recall from a different thread correctly, he thinks that any sex act that is not vaginal intercourse between a heterosexual married couple is perverted/immoral. But he can answer for himself. I don't get much value from talking to people that share his opinions, but I gave it a good shot recently.

Angel said even this was perverted and that all sexual acts since the expulsion from paradise were perverted.

I wonder how marke feels about "doggy" style" ?
 
Angel said even this was perverted and that all sexual acts since the expulsion from paradise were perverted.

I wonder how marke feels about "doggy" style" ?

Really? All sex acts are perverted? I don't think I know that poster. I hope not to.

And marke, inquiring minds want to know. Can I smash from the back if I keep it out of the butt?
 
Really? All sex acts are perverted? I don't think I know that poster. I hope not to.

And marke, inquiring minds want to know. Can I smash from the back if I keep it out of the butt?

Take a trip through the Sexual Perversion thread.

Angel eventually labelled himself a sexual pervert - as he didn't have sex as our common ancestors did. For Angel, that of course is Adam and Eve.
 
Take a trip through the Sexual Perversion thread.

Angel eventually labelled himself a sexual pervert - as he didn't have sex as our common ancestors did. For Angel, that of course is Adam and Eve.

I'll pop over there.
 
Back
Top Bottom