• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sexual Perversion

zyzygy said:
Why are some people so interested in other people's sexual behaviour? Very odd.
Click to expand...
Exactly the point of the thread. But don't Flemings and Walloons subscribe to laws governing sexuality? How do you square that political fact with your personal libertarianism?
 
Angel said:
Right as rain, CLAX.
It follows from this premise that those of our fellows critical of the sexuality of others as "perverted" are merely speaking with the authority of their own perversion.
Click to expand...

Okay, I get that not sure I agree totally but I understand.
 
Lf2grVJ.jpg

Wilhelm Reich​


"Nature and culture, instinct and morality, sexuality and achievement become incompatible as a result of the split in the human structure. The unity and congruity of culture and nature, work and love, morality and sexuality, longed for from time immemorial, will remain a dream as long as man continues to condemn the biological demand for natural (orgastic) sexual gratification."
—Wilhelm Reich, The Function of the Orgasm (1927)

"No man-made law ever, no matter whether derived from the past or projected onto a distant, unforeseeable future, can or should ever be empowered to claim that it is greater than the Natural Law from which it stems and to which it must inevitably return in the eternal rhythm of creation and decline of all things natural."
—Wilhelm Reich, Response to the FDA's Complaint for Injunction (22 February 1954)
Wilhelm Reich - Wikiquote

Sexual repression
Sigmund Freud was the first to use the term widely, and argued that it was one of the roots of many problems in Western society. Freud believed that people's naturally strong instincts toward sexuality were repressed by people in order to meet the constraints imposed on them by civilized life.
Click to expand...
Sexual repression - Wikipedia

Sexual Repression
Nothing inspires murderous mayhem in human beings more reliably than sexual repression. Denied food, water, or freedom of movement, people will get desperate and some may lash out at what they perceive as the source of their problems, albeit in a weakened state. But if expression of sexuality is thwarted, the human psyche tends to grow twisted into grotesque, enraged perversions of desire. Unfortunately, the distorted rage resulting from sexual repression rarely takes the form of rebellion against the people and institutions behind the repression.
Click to expand...
Sexual Repression | Psychology Today

Are we sexually repressed and don’t know it?
After the stifling norms of the 40s and 50s, the sexual revolution of the 1960s brought a new freedom of sexual expression, aided by the pill and women’s rights. The freedom of the 60s spilled over into the 70s, but as the 1980s dawned, the spread of AIDS/HIV brought anxiety, demonisation of promiscuity and a wave of self-enforced abstention. Today, as a society, we are once again at odds with our sexuality, and not just when it comes to our sexual relationships, but also how sexuality affects the other aspects of our lives.
Click to expand...
Are we sexually repressed and don’t know it? | Intimate Power
 
Angel said:
KevinKohler said:
Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.
Click to expand...
And sometimes it's bubble gum.
Click to expand...
I suspect my earlier riposte went over the heads of DP youth.
So since among three score posts making the case for universal sexual perversion this is what the audience picks up on, I take this opportunity to clarify the earlier throwaway post.

UIP9nj0.jpg

Bubble Gum Cigars and Cigarettes
Bubble Gum Cigars - Different Forms of Candy Cigarettes
El Bubble - Bubble Gum Cigars • Oh! Nuts(R)
 
This thread is about the perversion of natural sexuality by civilization.
This thread is about the further perversion of the perversion of natural sexuality by feminism and feminist fellow travelers over the last half-century, here in America and elsewhere in the world.

Civilized sexuality is necessarily unnatural.
Feminist sexuality is unnatural and unnecessary.
 
Angel said:
Sexual Perversion

Qath1akl.jpg


Disclaimer

Sorry to disappoint the prurient interest in slamming paraphilia which some of the locals seem to have,
but this thread is not about sexual perversion or sexual deviance as defined by the DSM-5,
or sexual perversion or deviance according to any other definition of sexual perversion or deviance that might fall under present-day sexual mores,
or for that matter any civilized notion of sexual perversion from any day and age in the last ten thousand years or so

I repeat, lest there be any misunderstanding on this score,
this thread is not about the sexual perversions we love to hate today
or the sexual perversions that our ancestors loved to hate

This thread is about the perversion of human sexuality by civilization itself in the first instance

the perversion of natural sexuality through the civilizing process

and then, in the second instance, over the last half-century, the perversion of the perversion of human sexuality by radical feminism


The thesis of this thread is as follows:

Civilization is sexual perversion

In other words, we are all sexual perverts

And our outrage at what appears to be sexual perversion according to the sexual mores of our day

is merely sexual perversion judging sexual perversion...


Comment?

Cavil?

Consternation?​



If you find the above disclaimer or thesis strange and difficult to understand, reading in the following series of threads arguing for a revaluation of sexual values is highly recommended:
Sexual Politics
Sexual Hypocrisy
Sexual Misconduct
Sexual Philosophy
Click to expand...

Are we talking feather or the whole chicken? :popcorn2:
 
Rich2018 said:
I have and no post 366 didn't.

So I'll ask you again to say what you mean: what is "natural sexuality" ?
Click to expand...
Angel said:
...
This thread is about the perversion of human sexuality by civilization itself in the first instance

the perversion of natural sexuality through the civilizing process

and then, in the second instance, over the last half-century, the perversion of the perversion of human sexuality by radical feminism


The thesis of this thread is as follows:

Civilization is sexual perversion

In other words, we are all sexual perverts

And our outrage at what appears to be sexual perversion according to the sexual mores of our day

is merely sexual perversion judging sexual perversion...
Click to expand...
Natural sexuality is sexuality in the state of nature, pre-civilization sexuality, animal sexuality.
 
Angel said:
Natural sexuality is sexuality in the state of nature, pre-civilization sexuality, animal sexuality.
Click to expand...

Aren't humans 'animals' with 'animal' sexuality ? And isn't that 'animal' sexuality of humans 'normal' and 'natural'?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom