What kind of twisted explicit sexual perversions are schools now teaching?

marke said:

I have 30 grandchildren, some of whom have been ill abused by sex perverts in our modern culture which promotes obsessions with sexual promiscuity and perversion.

Click to expand...

You may very well find out someday when those grand children are older, and willing to speak freely and openly, some of those grand children are homosexuals. If you are a real Christian, you will accept them as God made them, otherwise you may very well be told by some of them where to stick you bigoted non-Christlike world views.

Logician Man said:

Really ? I don't recall HRC advocating for anyone to go around grabbing others private parts. I guess when it comes to credentials for voting, Christians values must be at,or near, the bottom of your list.....which is totally contradictary to many of your posts up thread and elsewhere.

Click to expand...

Hillary threatened Juanita Broderick to keep her from telling anyone Bill raped her. Hillary was a rape facilitator and did much to destroy Bill's victims so he could keep his job an, consequently, she could keep her job.

marke said:

God created the finger that pulled the trigger to murder an innocent cop, but God did not give the BLM moron His permission to murder. God wants people to have sex in marriage, but He disapproves of adultery and perversion for many reasons logical people would easily understand if they were not so brainwashed into believing lies the ungodly perpetuate to cover their sins.

Click to expand...

Ah, so it's not only gays who have you in a tizzy--them thar blacks do too. :roll:

marke said:

Hillary threatened Juanita Broderick to keep her from telling anyone Bill raped her. Hillary was a rape facilitator and did much to destroy Bill's victims so he could keep his job an, consequently, she could keep her job.

Click to expand...

Can you prove HRC did what you claim? Or are you simply posting another positive claim to be tossed it the trash with many of your other unproven claims ?

Peter King said:

Sure, innocent children who do not have access to the internet with more porn on there than there ever will be in any adult video store. And the modern godless (even if that is dubious, that one only exist in your mind I am afraid) and responsible adults try and teach those impressionable children that making love and being careful to protect yourself is in no way comparable to that which they can easily see online. You should be thanking those hedonists (another baseless and ridiculous comment from you as you have ZERO evidence for that) are trying to save these children from making big mistakes and giving them a healthy and loving view on sex and procreation other than that which they learn from their friends and internet porn.

Click to expand...

I have no doubt deluded sex promoters think they are doing good to introduce little kids to sex for the first time, thinking what they are doing is needful. It is not needful. The deluded secularists are introducing little kids to sexual matters the little kids are not prepared to properly handle. The sex promoters are stupid, ill informed, and deluded if they think they are helping kids that way.

marke said:

I believe sex is a good thing to be enjoyed by a man and his wife in privacy and that good people do not talk about their private sex lives. My wife gave birth to 9 children who came into being because of sex between us. 'Nough said.

Click to expand...

So, IOW, you don't deny that you've never had oral sex and you'd refuse it if offered.

And that really sucks.

Peter King said:

If parents are too religious to protect their children than the state has to step in and do what the parents lack the responsible behavior to teach their children. And I think it is way more perverted to not teach your children about safe sex and the realities of sexual procreation than actually teaching them to be safe if you are going to have sex.

Click to expand...

Unbelievers will teach kids bad things they do not know are harming children and society. Fortunately, Christians can teach their own kids in Christian schools where the devil's deluded dogs cannot get to them.

Frigidweirdo said:

God created killing, apparently. He created carnivores, did he not? So, to say God is against murder is like saying God is against people with arms.

Or are you suggesting Lions weren't given permission by god to kill giraffes? And also, how on Earth would God give permission to lions? I mean, God's never spoken with me, so he's never given me permission to do anything, like breathing. Should we all stop breathing until God gives us permission?

He disapproves of adultery does he? I guess that's why Trump's president, on the back of all those Christian votes.

Presidential vote by religious affiliation and race | Pew Research Center

White, born again/evangelicals voted 81% for Trump 16% for Hillary. This is HOW MUCH GOD HATES ADULTERERS. 'pparently.

Click to expand...

God did not vote. Neither did God inspire people to vote for Hillary who openly disrespected conservative Christians for believing the Bible.

Peter King said:

Except that should not be legal, everybody has to get sex education, it is down to the parents to teach their children that having sex is not OK at a too young of age. Hey they can teach them that it is only allowed during marriage, as long as they know about the birds and the bees in a proper and non-judgemental manner.

Click to expand...

I don't disagree with the curriculum but I do agree with a parent's right to opt their child out.

marke said:

God did not vote. Neither did God inspire people to vote for Hillary who openly disrespected conservative Christians for believing the Bible.

Click to expand...

As should we all.

Peter King said:

no, they are more civilized as a lot of those who slavishly sit in church pews breaking loads of gods rules which they justify with claiming other people break other laws of god, even if they are not religious.

And civilized societies started 2 world wars, last time I checked more running around naked savages have not committed that level of uncivilized crimes against humanity and decency.

Click to expand...

Fighting Hitler was uncivilized? According to whom, jack-booted American democrat socialists?

Peter King said:

So let me get this correct, you claim people are idiots because you think they are enamored with factual science and actual scientific studies and you call that indoctrination of lies and misunderstandings of data? While you believe in a fictional god based on a fictional book with fictional events about fictional people? From a religion that bases it's who doctrine based on those most likely fake stories?

:lamo

If you want to believe in your god and your bible fine, but don't make fake up fake nonsense about people believe in facts and reality purely because they put facts and science before religion and made up religious laws.

But coming back to the subject, how is teaching youths about safe sex twisted? I know a lot of things that are very twisted but sexual education on school does not fall under that "twisted" moniker.

Click to expand...

Fiction science and erroneous interpretations of data are not to be respected no matter how highly esteemed the person is who is promoting the erroneous false science nonsense.

marke said:

Fiction science and erroneous interpretations of data are not to be respected no matter how highly esteemed the person is who is promoting the erroneous false science nonsense.

Click to expand...

THat sums up the Bible and all the myths people believe about gods perfectly.

Logician Man said:

If you were a real Christian who actually followed the teachings of Christ, you would be praying for those you perceive as sinners, not condemning them to hell. This tells me you either don't understand the teachings of Christ, or you willfully choose to reject and ignore them. That's your problem. I suggest you get with the program and work on your problem.

Click to expand...

Unbelieving rebels against God presume to tell Christians how to please God. How stupid is that?

marke said:

I have 30 grandchildren, some of whom have been ill abused by sex perverts in our modern culture which promotes obsessions with sexual promiscuity and perversion.

Click to expand...

I am sorry for your grandchildren, sexual perverts who prey on children need to be locked up in a closed facility until they are cured (which will likely never happen), if curing is impossible they have to be housed in a livable accommodation until they are no longer a danger, if it that is until they are 90. Sexual perverts who prey on children are sick in their mind.

Gay people as a rule however are attracted to other adult gay men. They are neither perverted or necessarily promiscuous.

marke said:

Hillary is no faithful God-fearing Christian. She has promoted much evil as a political leader and has not been cleared of multiple murders, thefts, corruption, law breaking and so forth in her years of 'public service.' She despises American conservative Christian patriots, and that should tell you all you need to know in the voting booth.

Click to expand...

And that is of course a bunch of nonsense. She may not be a conservative christian but unlike Trump she is a christian and has done loads of religious things and has stood up for her faith and actually knows and respects the bible. You may think you voted ethically but you really are just the opposite by voting for that cheating/lying/steeling orange idiot.

marke said:

I believe sex is a good thing to be enjoyed by a man and his wife in privacy and that good people do not talk about their private sex lives. My wife gave birth to 9 children who came into being because of sex between us. 'Nough said.

Click to expand...

Great, you do that, you live that way and let the rest of us decide for ourselves.

marke said:

I have no doubt deluded sex promoters think they are doing good to introduce little kids to sex for the first time, thinking what they are doing is needful. It is not needful. The deluded secularists are introducing little kids to sexual matters the little kids are not prepared to properly handle. The sex promoters are stupid, ill informed, and deluded if they think they are helping kids that way.

Click to expand...

More baseless BULL crap I see. You are just posting nonsense, and if anyone is stupid it is the backward religious extremists.

marke said:

Unbelievers will teach kids bad things they do not know are harming children and society. Fortunately, Christians can teach their own kids in Christian schools where the devil's deluded dogs cannot get to them.

Click to expand...

You really are the champion of posting baseless nonsense. Unbelievers will teach kids what they need to know to not harm others and themselves. And again, there is no god, no devil and religious people do plenty of harm.

Incredulous said:

I don't disagree with the curriculum but I do agree with a parent's right to opt their child out.

Click to expand...

Good, I do not because sadly they will not be taught that which they ought to know about sexuality and their own body. It was very strange to be told by a teacher that there is nothing wrong with having wet dreams as a teen. Just like young girls need to be taught about getting their period. It would not be the first time that young girls are totally unprepared for when that happens. I stand on the side of logical and fact based sexual education.

And a large deal of that should be teaching young people to not give their body away because of peer pressure, teach them pride and standing up for themselves so that they will not have sex until they are mentally and physically truly ready for having a sexual relationship when they are ready for it.

marke said:

Fighting Hitler was uncivilized? According to whom, jack-booted American democrat socialists?

Click to expand...

Another remark that has nothing to do with anything. And plenty of democrats fought in that war. Which makes them very different from the draft dodging loser in the WH.

And yes, wars are uncivilized but sometimes necessary. But still totally uncivilized.

marke said:

Fiction science and erroneous interpretations of data are not to be respected no matter how highly esteemed the person is who is promoting the erroneous false science nonsense.

Click to expand...

More nonsense. The only fiction is the bible and god. Science may sometimes get it wrong, but at least they are looking for the truth and facts, something more religions have no intention of doing.

TheGoverness said:

Nobody's teaching anyone about any of that. We're advocating for teaching teens to know about sex, and how to have it safely. Abstinence does nothing.

Click to expand...

And, knowing enough to be able to say 'no' until you are emotionally ready.

marke said:

Unbelieving rebels against God presume to tell Christians how to please God. How stupid is that?

Click to expand...

Not as stupid as you pretending you actually speak for any God.

marke said:

Fiction science and erroneous interpretations of data are not to be respected no matter how highly esteemed the person is who is promoting the erroneous false science nonsense.

Click to expand...

I keep running into you, making bold claims about the misuse of statistics, data, and logic in "science," but I have yet to see you write explicitly about how inferences from data should be carried out and issuing discussions organized. It's not because you fill up your posts with concepts like "fallacies," "strawmen arguments," or "erroneous interpretation of data" that it somehow makes sense. Accusations need to be backed up. For starters, in my experience, people who speak like this have no clue how to answer even basic methodological questions, so I'll ask a bunch of them, just to make sure we're not talking with an ignorant.


If I pressed you to explain what is a regression, would you be able to explain it clearly? And if I asked you to move from a model to an estimator, one assumption at a time showing us clearly where and how each assumption fits into the argument, would you be able to do it? If I talk about orthogonality, would you be able to tell me what does this have to do with regressions?

Or maybe you've got some sense of how to work in a more predictive setting. Then, how about you explain to us what is a kernel and why you can use it to approximate relationships without specifying the exact functional form? Can you give an example where it is used and point out why people can introduce kernels in this method? Do you know how tres methods work? How about neural networks? Or perhaps you would care to tell us how come factor-based forecasting models tend to perform well for macroeconomic data? Can you propose a method to extract latent factors from a large dataset, assuming the data has a factor structure? Can you tell me what is the link between latent factor and the psychological literature on personality or even on intelligence?

I can go into even more basic stuff. What is the link between statistics and probability? In the Neyman-Pearson framework, why do we work from the comparison of a null versus an alternative hypothesis? When I say that a point estimate lies outside the 95% confidence interval around zero, what does this mean? What's the difference between noise and signal? What is backtesting or pseudo-out-of-sample forecasting? If someone runs 10 000 such backtests to pick out an investment strategy, what would you tell them?