Sexual deviant's flag flown over State Capitol

johnwk said:

I do not understand why using "sexual deviants" is "unkind, especially when this identifiable group constantly refer to specific deviant sexual proclivities to identify themselves.

JWK

Let’s not forget Joe Biden is the Democrat Party Leaders shakedown candidate, and does not support individuals being free to negotiate their own employment contracts. He wants every American to pay a union representative a monthly kickback fee in order to work in America.

Click to expand...

For the record, there is no Democrat (sic) Party. And I didn't know Joe Biden supported a plan to make every worker in America part of a union! Can you link to where he supports this plan? Thanks!

TheParser said:

1. To be called a "deviant" hurts people's feelings.

Click to expand...

I can't understand how you come to that conclusion when these deviants celebrate their deviant behavior and take great "pride" in it.



JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

TheParser said:

3. For example, I do not want people to enter this country without permission. So I now use the term that many people are starting to use: "unauthorized immigrant." In fact, many media outlets simply refer to "migrants." If you were to say "illegal alien," that would cause many people in 2019 to be offended.

Click to expand...

The people you refer to are illegal entrants. And that is how I address them. I am offended when people use words to hide what is.


JWK

Democrat leaders claim to be advocates for hard working people. If that is so, why do they not promote an end to the unconstitutional “Temporary Victory Tax” of 1943, which began federal confiscation of the bread which working people have earned by the sweat of their labor?

johnwk said:

Wrong. You haven't been paying attention. The sexual deviant crowd constantly sues those who attempt to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.


Why are you making stuff up? At least admit the sexual deviant crowd, in general, detests, with a passion, those who find their sexual proclivities objectionable, and dare to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.



JWK


Without a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalism [our MSM], the crisis at our southern border would never have grown to what now amounts to an outright invasion and threatens the general welfare of the United states.

Click to expand...

Hate to break it to you bud, but it was decided decades ago that there was no "right to be a inbred bigot".

During the Civil Rights Era, as a matter of fact

JasperL said:

I didn't know Joe Biden supported a plan to make every worker in America part of a union! Can you link to where he supports this plan? Thanks!

Click to expand...

Joe Biden has stated with regard to right-to-work laws, that they are a “concerted, full-throated, well-organized, well-financed, well-thought-out, long-term effort, waging a war on labor's house . . . ”


JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership has been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadership freed the democrat’s slaves. ___ Author unknown

dirtpoorchris said:

We now find out that that whole ordeal was over a drug deal gone bad and Matthew Shephard not paying up.



So because he decided to investigate and found out that Mathew Shepard was a methhead they lable him as a Holocaust denier out of nowhere. He was a druggy who happened to burn his meth dealer and happend to be gay.

Click to expand...

"Culture critic Alyssa Rosenberg criticized the book for being poorly sourced, stating: "by not distinguishing which quotations are manufactured from recollections, which are paraphrases recounted by sources, and which were spoken directly to him",[4] and countered most of the major aspects of the book.[4] For example, she disputed claims about Shepard's alleged drug dealing, as most of the sources remained suspect or otherwise unsubstantiated. "Jimenez never qualifies how credible the sources are, or validates their closeness to Shepard, or evaluates the potential motivations for their accounts", she wrote.[4]

Some police officials interviewed after Jimenez's book's publication disputed certain claims made in the book. Dave O'Malley, the Laramie police commander over the investigations division at the time of Shepard's murder, said Jimenez's claim that Shepard was "a methamphetamine kingpin is almost humorous. Someone that would buy into that certainly would believe almost anything they read." Other police, such as the officer who found the murder weapon, believed it was a drug-related killing.[5]

Rob Debree, lead sheriff's investigator at the time, said the book contains "factual errors and lies", and deemed Jimenez's claim that Shepard was a drug dealer "truly laughable".[6]"

Hate to break it to you bud but it ain't that simple.

The Book of Matt - Wikipedia

Tigerace117 said:

Hate to break it to you bud, but it was decided decades ago that there was no "right to be a inbred bigot".

During the Civil Rights Era, as a matter of fact

Click to expand...

Stop trying to co-opt the civil rights fight for Black Americans.


JWK


Socialist democrats running for office will promise food on the table, free public housing, health care for all, guaranteed income, free college tuition, and other niceties by taxing the so called rich; and if by chance they ever do gain political power because of such promises made, their socialist iron-fisted dependency will enslave the very fools who elected them.

johnwk said:

Joe Biden has stated with regard to right-to-work laws, that they are a “concerted, full-throated, well-organized, well-financed, well-thought-out, long-term effort, waging a war on labor's house . . . ”


JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership has been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadership freed the democrat’s slaves. ___ Author unknown

Click to expand...

OK, so that's different than supporting the unionization of every workplace, but you know that.

And the unknown author of your quote is an illiterate moron, because there is no Democrat (sic) Party, and harking back to 1865 for the good things done by the GOP is historically ignorant and pretty pathetic as well. The parties have changed a bit since 1865. Look it up!

johnwk said:

Stop trying to co-opt the civil rights fight for Black Americans.


JWK


Socialist democrats running for office will promise food on the table, free public housing, health care for all, guaranteed income, free college tuition, and other niceties by taxing the so called rich; and if by chance they ever do gain political power because of such promises made, their socialist iron-fisted dependency will enslave the very fools who elected them.

Click to expand...

Same basic principle bud. Just as it wasn't decided you don't have the right to keep African Americans from dining at your resturant or buying things at your business because of their race, you don't have the right to do such things on the basis of someone being gay.

johnwk said:

I do not understand why using "sexual deviants" is "unkind, especially when this identifiable group constantly refer to specific deviant sexual proclivities to identify themselves.


JWK


Let’s not forget Joe Biden is the Democrat Party Leaders shakedown candidate, and does not support individuals being free to negotiate their own employment contracts. He wants every American to pay a union representative a monthly kickback fee in order to work in America.

Click to expand...

Are you going to vote for a sexual deviant in the next election, and do you currently support a sexual deviant? Did you vote for a sexual deviant?

johnwk said:

Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

Click to expand...

It's pride month. If you don't like it write a complaint.

johnwk said:

You never answered the question.


:roll:


JWK

The Democrat Party Leadershiphas been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadershipfreed the democrat’s slaves. ___ Author unknown

Click to expand...

It's a stupid question why are they flying a flag there because it's pride month. Are you asking why don't they view them as sexual deviance like you do because they're not you, and they have different views.

If you can't handle that this is probably not the country for you.

johnwk said:

Oh, but our sexual deviant crowd does impinge upon the right of others to be free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.


:roll:


JWK


The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

Click to expand...

Actually has to do with the government. The LGBT group has a sympathetic ear from a lot of governments. I would say this is based more on partisanship than anything else.

I'm willing to hear about how rules regarding contracting for things you don't agree with are unfair but I'm not willing to hear someone who carries on with moralizing bologna.

It would probably be wise for you not to call them sexual deviance understanding that that word of course as a pejorative meaning but I'm pretty sure that's the reason why you chose it.

So at this point you have a self-fulfilling prophecy why should anyone care what you think if you think anybody that doesn't act the way you think they should is deviant.

Meaning people like you are categorized as haters or placed into the category of a hate group.


Maybe you're angry which I understand and can even sympathize with but you should not take your anger out on other people. However maybe you are the rare case that thinks homosexuality should be illegal in any promotion there of should be taboo, in which case you are going to be inundated with it. Because it's only by challenging taboos that we overcome the attitudes that create them.

So which are you?

"___Author unknown"

:lamo


I think I know.

johnwk said:

Wrong. You haven't been paying attention. The sexual deviant crowd constantly sues those who attempt to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Click to expand...

that is because they are typically citizens and they have the 7th Amendment rights. You should be more concerned about courts that don't see the rights of the people they are suing.

But I understand courts aren't icky gay people that do that stuff you don't like.

Why are you making stuff up? At least admit the sexual deviant crowd, in general, detests, with a passion, those who find their sexual proclivities objectionable, and dare to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Click to expand...

I have no problem admitting that people wish to make others pay for their biased views.

That's exactly what you're doing. But it's the dunning-kruger effect in both cases.

Essentially your argument is the same as theirs. "I am right because I think I am so therefore everyone who disagrees with me must be wrong."

johnwk said:

I do not understand why using "sexual deviants" is "unkind, especially when this identifiable group constantly refer to specific deviant sexual proclivities to identify themselves.

Click to expand...

When someone tells you something is offencive and your intent was not to offend, when they would bring it up to you you would respond with a statement like this, "I apologize if you were offended that was not my intent."

But if you double down and suggest that people's offense is because they don't understand the words you're using, the message is loud and clear your intent was definitely to offend.

I understand the only reason this is offensive is because people take offense. I however do not I am proud to be considered a sexual deviant by your standards.

I take it as a compliment. I view your standards as immoral and backward. So I'm happy to be considered a deviant by the immoral and backward.

If only I could convince my fellow deviants is that your standards are immoral and backward, your words with mean nothing.

MrWonka said:

The answer is so simple it doesn't really deserve a response, but since you're struggling to figure this out here you go. Being gay does not make you a sexual deviant or immoral in anyway.

Click to expand...

where are you agree with you I must say this, your message will be lost because you're talking to a moral relativist. Which is another word for an amoral person. He rejects subjective morality for his own relative you on what he would probably consider objective morality, but no doubt it's probably relative to whatever religious sect he belongs to. Hence moral relativism.

So according to his amoral ideals we are deviants. And because I don't recognize his morality as any kind of authority I take it as a compliment if someone with this idea says I am deviant. Because what they're saying is you don't submit to their moralistic worldview.

Nothing can be truer.

It doesn't impact your life in anyway and so people like you need to be reminded that in a free country when someone else's life choices don't impact your life in anyway you need to shut the **** up and leave them alone.

Click to expand...

correct it doesn't affect his life except for the fact that his relative morality does not have a sympathetic ear with the government of the particular state this flag is flying in.

He takes it as an offense, which I responded by saying the existence of gay and lesbian and transgender people not being ashamed or quiet about who and what they are it's not meant to offend him, so if he chooses to take offense I can't help that. But I think it's too much to ask that I shut up and go back into the closet in order to spare his feelings.

So be it what you would consider a sexual deviant is not done to offend him. Though I imagine some of the posts and parading and flag waving seems to be done specifically for that purpose for all I know some of it could be it seems to be more about the people doing it and the catharsis.

CLAX1911 said:

Meaning people like you are categorized as haters or placed into the category of a hate group.

Click to expand...

dirtpoorchris said:

We now find out that that whole ordeal was over a drug deal gone bad and Matthew Shephard not paying up.



So because he decided to investigate and found out that Mathew Shepard was a methhead they lable him as a Holocaust denier out of nowhere. He was a druggy who happened to burn his meth dealer and happend to be gay.

Click to expand...

I agree about the Matthew Shepard case but there are cases of violence being enacted upon gay people because they are gay.

The pulse nightclub shooting. The murder of Paul Broussard. Are two incidents that spring to mind.

dirtpoorchris said:

Click to expand...

I'm sorry you feel that way. I think your feelings are irrational.

Everybody you don't like is not Hitler.

johnwk said:

Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

Click to expand...

gay people are a gender and a protected class

Pro-lifers are just a group of people...

CLAX1911 said:

I understand the only reason this is offensive is because people take offense. I however do not I am proud to be considered a sexual deviant by your standards.

I take it as a compliment.

Click to expand...

Well, there you have it! How could I suspect that a majority of our sexual deviant crowd takes offense to being identified as such when they themselves celebrate their various sexual deviant behavior [LGBT], and assert they are proud of it?


As to the minority who are not proud of their behavior, and thus take offense to being accurately identified which upsets them, I can understand their dilemma, but the facts are what they are.


JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

johnwk said:

Well, there you have it! How could I suspect that a majority of our sexual deviant crowd takes offense to being identified as such when they themselves celebrate their various sexual deviant behavior [LGBT], and assert they are proud of it?


As to the minority who are not proud of their behavior, and thus take offense to being accurately identified which upsets them, I can understand their dilemma, but the facts are what they are.


JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

Click to expand...

Bodhisattva said:

gay people are a gender and a protected class

Click to expand...

Not by the terms of our federal Constitution, except with regard to voting which is protected by the Nineteenth Amendment.


:roll:


JWK



Civil rights ought not be based upon the personal desires of sexual deviants who now impinge upon the inalienable right of mankind being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

johnwk said:

Not by the terms of our federal Constitution, except with regard to voting which is protected by the Nineteenth Amendment.


:roll:


JWK



Civil rights ought not be based upon the personal desires of sexual deviants who now impinge upon the inalienable right of mankind being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Click to expand...

I explained why... you are free to dislike the reason.