• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This is NOT OK

Checkerboard Strangler said:
Which people are defending it? The anchor talks about "leftists" but doesn't make any direct references to any specific political group or specific individuals. In fact, she doesn't even name the play.

So the entire "news" story is just a sensationalized callout because some idiot had horribly poor judgment in casting a play, and a lawmaker decided to respond. Truth be told, the hard limit on 18 years of age is fairly reasonable sounding to me, provided that it doesn't extend to innocuous things like a stage kiss, for example. There goes all the junior high school Romeo and Juliet productions.

But still, persons under eighteen should not be roped into simulating sexual acts in a performance. That's reasonable.
And I'm a lefty, how about that...
Click to expand...

Congrats, you are one of few on the left that objects

Did you miss the part where the Mayor of Lancaster said that there was nothing wrong with this? Or just chose to ignore that part? Evidently you only watched a portion, It's right in the video @ the 2:24 mark in the video.
 
PoppyCock said:
Congrats, you are one of few on the left that objects

Did you miss the part where the Mayor of Lancaster said that there was nothing wrong with this? Or just chose to ignore that part? Evidently you only watched a portion, It's right in the video @ the 2:24 mark in the video.
Click to expand...

No, and I didn't mention it because it was an outright lie by OANN.
But if you want the Mayor's actual statement, it's not like he made it in secret.

The owners and managers of JD Hendersons did not approve of or condone this activity. Upon learning of this performance, the owners quickly condemned the show and banned this troupe of performers from returning to the establishment.[...]
My office addresses resident concerns on a daily basis. We were not contacted regarding this issue. Knowing the facts would have made a difference. There have been serious threats of violence resulting from this post. Let us hope and pray that no harm comes to person or property as a result of it.
Click to expand...

And I'm still waiting for you to back up your straw man argument that "the Left" is clamoring in outrage over this.
Some people made a poor choice in judgment and a local bar told them to never come back, and a lawmaker has decided to revamp a law to close loopholes. Where's the problem? Sounds like measures are being taken and that's the end of the issue for now.

But I realize that you're so desperate to manufacture some fake outrage, and seeing as how that's what you always do here on DP, all I can say is, you've sunk to a new low, with help from a radicalized media outlet that exists for one reason only: IDIOTS who need a siren to wail along with.

OutrageSiren.jpg
 
Here is your leftist rag promoting this deviance.

RuPaul Loves 'Drag Kid' Desmond. You Will Too. Fiercely.
RuPaul Loves ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond. You Will Too. Fiercely.
Feb 7, 2018 - I just love their support, it's fabulous.” Desmond's parents, Andrew and Wendylou Napoles, from New York City, have been fully aware of ...
 
PoppyCock said:
You responded to my thread, you must have one and you made a poor attempt to try making the two, somehow equal. Feel free to find some other thread. Anyone attempting to defend or minimalize this, is one sick puppy.
Click to expand...

I'm a lurker that happened to respond to a side-shoot of the conversation. I express no opinion and hold no stance, and this is always the case for anything that is new to me. I make a habit of always responding only when I feel I've become acqauinted with a broad array of stances of the topics at hand, and I do not respond to attempts to apeal to emotion.

You are trying to confront me on opinions that I never expressed, nor implied. I've already admitted to being agnostic on the subject at hand, and yet you continue to attempt to engage me. That's really ****ing pathetic.
 
DH Kirkwood said:
I'm a lurker that happened to respond to a side-shoot of the conversation. I express no opinion and hold no stance, and this is always the case for anything that is new to me. I make a habit of always responding only when I feel I've become acqauinted with a broad array of stances of the topics at hand, and I do not respond to attempts to apeal to emotion.

You are trying to confront me on opinions that I never expressed, nor implied. I've already admitted to being agnostic on the subject at hand, and yet you continue to attempt to engage me. That's really ****ing pathetic.
Click to expand...

Not as much as your denial and attempting to equate the 2. I "engaged" you once as you attempted some lame ass "whataboutism"
Not my fault you tried that garbage defense of the indefensible.
 
PoppyCock said:
Not as much as your denial and attempting to equate the 2. I "engaged" you once as you attempted some lame ass "whataboutism"
Not my fault you tried that garbage defense of the indefensible.
Click to expand...

I did nothing of the sort. Another user comented on cheerleaders and beauty pageants, and I'm very opinionated about that, so I commented only on that. I don't know what that user's intent on bringing that up was, and nor do I care. Whilst lurking, I saw a part of the discussion that piqued my interest, nothing more, nothing less. I bend over backwards to avoid whataboutisms, and I don't appreciate being accused of stooping to such tactics simply because I commented to a thing.

Throughout this exchange, I have not contested whatever point that you're trying to make. I simply don't care. Not yet, anyway. You're harrassing someone because you erroneously perceive some ulterior motive, like so many other forumgoers seem to do on an almost daily basis. You might want to consider, going forward, and take a deep breath before jumping to conclussions. Hell, it's not like I haven't been there.
 
DH Kirkwood said:
I did nothing of the sort. Another user comented on cheerleaders and beauty pageants, and I'm very opinionated about that, so I commented only on that. I don't know what that user's intent on bringing that up was, and nor do I care. Whilst lurking, I saw a part of the discussion that piqued my interest, nothing more, nothing less. I bend over backwards to avoid whataboutisms, and I don't appreciate being accused of stooping to such tactics simply because I commented to a thing.

Throughout this exchange, I have not contested whatever point that you're trying to make. I simply don't care. Not yet, anyway. You're harrassing someone because you erroneously perceive some ulterior motive, like so many other forumgoers seem to do on an almost daily basis. You might want to consider, going forward, and take a deep breath before jumping to conclussions. Hell, it's not like I haven't been there.
Click to expand...

Just went and looked, please post the sequence or stop telling lies.
 
PoppyCock said:
It's disgusting, normal people see this and the law is just common sense. If liberals want to act like this is OK, they deserve the contempt such exploitation and sexualization of children, will rightly earn them. It's plain child abuse.
Click to expand...

Possibly agree, but the law proposed seems absurd.
 
PoppyCock said:
Congrats, you are one of few on the left that objects

Did you miss the part where the Mayor of Lancaster said that there was nothing wrong with this? Or just chose to ignore that part? Evidently you only watched a portion, It's right in the video @ the 2:24 mark in the video.
Click to expand...

It's already been proven that this is false, so to date you have... zero "leftists" who are defending the exploitation of children.
 
wolfsgirl said:
I've seen 11 year olds playing guitar in bars decades ago. This isn't a new thing, and many if not most states allow children to perform in bars as long as their parent or guardian is present.
Click to expand...

If I may, wolfsgirl: is it your position that it is acceptable or at the very least tolerable for minor pre-pubescent children to engage in sexually suggestive or explicit acts in places such as strip clubs so long as their parent or guardian is present and supervising them in some manner?
 
Last edited:
Felis Leo said:
If I may, wolfsgirl: is it your position that it is acceptable or at the very least tolerable for minor pre-pubescent children to engage in sexually suggestive or explicit acts in places such strip clubs so long as their parent or guardian is present and supervising them in some manner?
Click to expand...

...which strip club allows children in?
 
PoppyCock said:
I dont understand how anyone defends this, has the world gone insane?


YouTube
Click to expand...

I like the term the bleached blonde keeps spewing, "highly sexualized". That chick needs to get laid - and for maximum enjoyment she should be laid by a leftist. We always send conservatives' wives back to their husbands with a smile.
 
Deuce said:
...which strip club allows children in?
Click to expand...

None, as far as I am aware, Deuce. The instance with the young boy drag queen doing a strip club-style dance seems to have happened at a gay bar, not a strip club. But I am simply asking wolfsgirl or anyone else who cares to answer whether such allowances would be acceptable in principle, and on what principle that would be. It does not seem that many here, left, right or center believe that allowing a child to be engaged in such activity is acceptable.
 
Last edited:
KevinKohler said:
Has that boy undergone surgery to permanently alter the appearance of his flesh, like that anchor has?
Click to expand...

Ohhhh.... no yoo dih-int!

Total mike drop, dude. Well done :)
 
lurchadams said:
I like the term the bleached blonde keeps spewing, "highly sexualized". That chick needs to get laid - and for maximum enjoyment she should be laid by a leftist. We always send conservatives' wives back to their husbands with a smile.
Click to expand...

Most Conservative girls have morals and like real men, not "men" that wear dresses and tinkle in the ladies room and buy into that "gender spectrum" horse dung, try again.
 
lurchadams said:
I like the term the bleached blonde keeps spewing, "highly sexualized". That chick needs to get laid - and for maximum enjoyment she should be laid by a leftist. We always send conservatives' wives back to their husbands with a smile.
Click to expand...

This post has no class.
 
PoppyCock said:
Most Conservative girls have morals and like real men, not "men" that wear dresses and tinkle in the ladies room and buy into that "gender spectrum" horse dung, try again.
Click to expand...

Conservative women have the same needs as liberal women. Just because cons' wives don't tell them about their unbridled lust sessions with progressives, who are much less inhibited and much more enlightened than cons, does not mean it doesn't happen - and often!

Do you think all the women who post on forums like Tinder, Ashley Madison, and Ok Cupid are all liberals? Think again, my friend. I can tell you from personal experience.
 
PoppyCock said:
Most Conservative girls have morals and like real men, not "men" that wear dresses and tinkle in the ladies room and buy into that "gender spectrum" horse dung, try again.
Click to expand...

And there it is. Your real motivation here.
 
lurchadams said:
Conservative women have the same needs as liberal women. Just because cons' wives don't tell them about their unbridled lust sessions with progressives, who are much less inhibited and much more enlightened than cons, does not mean it doesn't happen - and often!
Click to expand...

I cant speak for all conservative women, however my personal experience has been that liberal men are unattractive, and they also tend to be shorter than conservative men.
 
Wan said:
I cant speak for all conservative women, however my personal experience has been that liberal men are unattractive, and they also tend to be shorter than conservative men.
Click to expand...

I remember this woman in Oregon I with whom I had a year-long affair. Her conservative husband, during their times of intimacy would ask her to, "just lay there and be quiet". <---I promise you I did not make this up! I guess conservative men like to simulate necrophilia.

During the times we were together, she was totally free and uninhibited and knew she could explore whatever adventures she wanted without fear or judgement. She was the first woman who asked me to "dominate" her.

I considered what I was doing for this lovely young woman to be a service to her sanity.
 
lurchadams said:
I remember this woman in Oregon I with whom I had a year-long affair. Her conservative husband, during their times of intimacy would ask her to, "just lay there and be quiet". <---I promise you I did not make this up! I guess conservative men like to simulate necrophilia.

During the times we were together, she was totally free and uninhibited and knew she could explore whatever adventures she wanted without fear or judgement. She was the first woman who asked me to "dominate" her.

I consider what I was doing for this lovely young woman a service to her sanity.
Click to expand...

Nah, its because he's thinking of someone (something?) Else.
 
lurchadams said:
I remember this woman in Oregon I with whom I had a year-long affair. Her conservative husband, during their times of intimacy would ask her to, "just lay there and be quiet". <---I promise you I did not make this up! I guess conservative men like to simulate necrophilia.

During the times we were together, she was totally free and uninhibited and knew she could explore whatever adventures she wanted without fear or judgement. She was the first woman who asked me to "dominate" her.

I consider what I was doing for this lovely young woman a service to her sanity.
Click to expand...

Even assuming this was not made up, so what? Do you think sex is very important?
 
lurchadams said:
I remember this woman in Oregon I with whom I had a year-long affair. Her conservative husband, during their times of intimacy would ask her to, "just lay there and be quiet". <---I promise you I did not make this up! I guess conservative men like to simulate necrophilia.

During the times we were together, she was totally free and uninhibited and knew she could explore whatever adventures she wanted without fear or judgement. She was the first woman who asked me to "dominate" her.

I considered what I was doing for this lovely young woman to be a service to her sanity.
Click to expand...

What a novel rationalization.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom