• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Males with beards have smaller testicles: study

Thingfish said:
It just ain’t so, I’ve a beard and my nuts at last visit measured 27 mm and weighed 5 metric tons...apiece!
Click to expand...
Let me guess, they're made out of brass too, amirite?
 
Rexedgar said:
If you get old enough, there is a constant danger of sitting on one or both.....:eek:
Click to expand...

I never cease to be amazed at the things I learn on this site.:mrgreen:
 
Who cares if you have small or big balls. Smaller would be better, less chance of sitting on them, squishing them between your legs, less of a target for a nut shot.
 
I really couldn't tell you how my testicles compare to an average.
 
I guess I'm easily amused, because all I can say is, this dumb article about this study had me laughing for a good portion of the morning.
 
So they're comparing humans to other primates again. *face palm*

Last time I checked, human males don't wave their naked balls around displaying power.

The other thing is that testicle size has no correlation to testosterone production in healthy males.

This study has so many flawed parameters I could write my own paper on it.
 
Northern Light said:
So they're comparing humans to other primates again. *face palm*

Last time I checked, human males don't wave their naked balls around displaying power.
Click to expand...
Depending on what fraternity you have joined

Lol

The other thing is that testicle size has no correlation to testosterone production in healthy males.

This study has so many flawed parameters I could write my own paper on it.
Click to expand...
Lol I don't take things like this seriously.
 
Northern Light said:
Last time I checked, human males don't wave their naked balls around displaying power.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHA!!! If we had permission, I guarantee you a LOT of guys would wave their prongs around in public in a hot second.

 
Northern Light said:
So they're comparing humans to other primates again. *face palm*

Last time I checked, human males don't wave their naked balls around displaying power.

The other thing is that testicle size has no correlation to testosterone production in healthy males.

This study has so many flawed parameters I could write my own paper on it.
Click to expand...

Come on, laugh...it's funny. :lamo
 
Dragonfly said:
I would like to know exactly what percentage of women out there actually give testicle size any consideration or thought at all????

I gotta believe the number is so low that it's mathematically insignificant.

I'd assume that if asked to make a list of 100 things women actually care about regarding a potential mate, that testicle size wouldn't even be a consideration.

Whereas for many women, facial hair is absolutely a definite turn-on or turn-off.

So yeah, given the options I'd gladly pick smaller berries for the ability to grow a full and luxurious beard/mustache.
Click to expand...

As far as I know, beards are inherently attractive because they're a sign of high testosterone in men. Women are generally drawn by that because it suggests the man has a good sex drive and can probably reproduce. While this isn't always true, I feel that it usually is. Men who don't grow much facial hair seem less driven than the ones that do. In fact, I think studies show that strenuous exercise and physical work can encourage facial hair growth - I used to work in construction and it's a hairy man's haven. So it makes sense that beards would be sign as a sign of male vitality.

Then again, maybe these men with the thick beards (either letting them grow out naturally or doing as much physical work to stimulate growth) are doing so to compensate for a smaller ball size haha
 
The claim is absurd. Hair is dead. So there is no more "energy" required to have a beard. A study based upon primates who do not shave has no relevancy.
 
Rexedgar said:
Tex, you are overthinking this........imo. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Yes. IMO, (and probably the study's ?) the beard is overcompensation for being a grower and not a show-er? I had a beard until I was 50 because I (still do) look so young. If you believe that....
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom