• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:3596] Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage

Lisa said:
Why would a mother and a grandparent get married?
Click to expand...

For the benefit of the children. To avoid estate taxes like Windsor in the DOMA case. For any of the 100s of benefits the gays insisted be made available to them.
 
dixon01767 said:
Ok........ Still refutes it.
Click to expand...

How can it refute something I didnt say?


I will not play your game and try to guess your what your non argument is so you can then get on your high horse and yell out strawman
 
Quag said:
I wasn't talking about that with reference to making new laws. Not that incestuous marriage is any argument against SSM
Now when you decide to actually make an argument please let us know
Click to expand...


So full of it and seemingly unaware that the forum records all your posts.

Quag said:
Because it would be complicated/expensive and serve no purpose but to appease a shrinking minority of bigots
Click to expand...

Quag said:
Creating new laws is always complex and expensive.
Click to expand...
 
dixon01767 said:
So full of it and seemingly unaware that the forum records all your posts.
Click to expand...
Are you insane?
Where in any of that is there anything to do with whatever strawman you think you are making?

Oh yeah it doenst

just another fail on the part of the guy who is too scared to make an actual argument
 
Quag said:
Quiet Pewee the adults are talking
Click to expand...
I5bQuN1.jpg
 
dixon01767 said:
For the benefit of the children. To avoid estate taxes like Windsor in the DOMA case. For any of the 100s of benefits, the gays insisted be made available to them.
Click to expand...

Legally that is not a marriage. There are other ways to achieve that goal instead of claiming to be married.
 
Quag said:
Are you insane?
Where in any of that is there anything to do with whatever strawman you think you are making?

Oh yeah it doenst

just another fail on the part of the guy who is too scared to make an actual argument
Click to expand...

Right here

Quag said:
I wasn't talking about that with reference to making new laws.
Click to expand...

Quag said:
Creating new laws is always complex and expensive. .
Click to expand...
 
Lisa said:
Legally that is not a marriage.
Click to expand...

No one claimed it was. All 50 states prohibit such a marriage which is the point.


Lisa said:
There are other ways to achieve that goal instead of claiming to be married.
Click to expand...

Nope, no other way to be exempted from estate taxes. And I wasnt suggesting they claim to be married and was instead suggesting that the law be changed to allow them to actually be married
 
Quag said:
Nothing you have said even begin to discuss my points Ill summarize
Click to expand...
I don't care about your points they don't have anything to do with the argument I making. if all you're going to do is talk past me then there's no reason to continue this.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I don't care about your points they don't have anything to do with the argument I making. if all you're going to do is talk past me then there's no reason to continue this.
Click to expand...

Agreed we are talking past each other
 
CLAX1911 said:
Do you know what my position is?
Click to expand...

I Believe so
That govt should not be invovled in marraige
Thats marraige is like a loan and that govt only discriminates in marraige contracts.
I would ask if you know mine but it is irrelvant as I beleive we are about to go into circles again
 
Quag said:
I Believe so
That govt should not be invovled in marraige
Thats marraige is like a loan and that govt only discriminates in marraige contracts.
I would ask if you know mine but it is irrelvant as I beleive we are about to go into circles again
Click to expand...

No that's not my position. my position is that people shouldn't have to ask the government permission to enter into a marriage contract.

Because you were arguing with me I would assume but you think they should.

I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong in assuming that.
 
CLAX1911 said:
No that's not my position. my position is that people shouldn't have to ask the government permission to enter into a marriage contract.

Because you were arguing with me I would assume but you think they should.

I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong in assuming that.
Click to expand...
Sigh this is a waste¸
Do you have any clue what I was saying?
 
Quag said:
Sigh this is a waste¸
Do you have any clue what I was saying?
Click to expand...

If you don't want to clear it up what the hell are you posting for?

It's only a waste because you are wasting time asking stupid questions.

This post that you just made is a waste.
 
CLAX1911 said:
If you don't want to clear it up what the hell are you posting for?

It's only a waste because you are wasting time asking stupid questions.

This post that you just made is a waste.
Click to expand...

Ill just assume that means you dont know my position and wish to end this
 
Quag said:
Ill just assume that means you dont know my position and wish to end this
Click to expand...

The only person wasting anything is you.

Unless of course the only reason you engage in discussion is to posture.

I told you already three posts ago what I thought your position was, and would happily admit that I'm wrong.

But you want to waste time with this kind of stupid nonsense.

If you wished this to end, stop responding to me. if you respond to this you wish to continue because you're continuing.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom