• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:3596] Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage

Tanngrisnir said:
Irrelevant. People don't have to be white to be racist, only stupid.
Click to expand...

You can think that I am stupid all you want. It won't stop me from being racist.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Why would any rational, sober adult care one whit about the future of any cosmetic genetic trait?
Click to expand...

Personally I feel that these traits are beautiful. And I believe there is intrinsic worth in the preservation of beauty. Maybe you dont see it the same way, which is fine.
 
dixon01767 said:
No one claimed you had. Looking for your next strawman to glom onto?
Click to expand...

So then what were you posting in response to? What is your continuation of the debate?

(Pretty sure you lost track of the initial conversation as you bobbed and weaved to not 'look wrong on the Internetz'. Certainly you couldnt backpeddle fast enough from your claim that closely related people marrying was NOT mostly based on medical (genetic) reasons.)
 
Wan said:
Personally I feel that these traits are beautiful. And I believe there is intrinsic worth in the preservation of beauty. Maybe you dont see it the same way, which is fine.
Click to expand...

When it comes to people, I believe more in the content of their character than their looks.

Breeding for outwardly physical traits leads to inbreeding and the concentration of deleterious genes. See: breeding dogs and other domestic animals.

Fortunately, I'm not aware of any societies shallow enough to be encouraging reproduction on the basis of "looks" or "outward appearance."
 
Wan said:
I don't care to prove to you that white people don't want to associate with minorities, because what you think means nothing to me.
Click to expand...

If you didnt care, you would not be posting the claim. You do care oh by golly you do. You just cant back it up, just like the Klan of old, they were lying.
 
Wan said:
Personally I feel that these traits are beautiful. And I believe there is intrinsic worth in the preservation of beauty. Maybe you dont see it the same way, which is fine.
Click to expand...


We got a dog whistler here. Lets skip the subtext shall we?
 
bomberfox said:
If you didnt care, you would not be posting the claim. You do care oh by golly you do. You just cant back it up, just like the Klan of old, they were lying.
Click to expand...

Yes, I do care. I care very deeply. You have won.
 
Wan said:
Yes, I do care. I care very deeply. You have won.
Click to expand...

Ive won many posts ago since you have utterly failed to post anything substantial. Oooooh the preservation of the soft silky skin! The lavish beauty! Too bad we will never get anything that will help us survive other environments but we can keep, nay immortalize the fair skin!
 
Last edited:
Wan said:
You can think that I am stupid all you want. It won't stop me from being racist.
Click to expand...

Now that bears repeating. It's most definitely sig-worthy.
 
bomberfox said:
Oooooh the preservation of the soft silky skin! The lavish beauty! Too bad we will never get anything that will help us survive other environments but we can keep, nay immortalize the fair skin!
Click to expand...

Why do you care that I want to keep these traits around?
 
Wan said:
Why do you care that I want to keep these traits around?
Click to expand...

I care that you want to drag us back to the heinous victorian racism that existed in America. Trying to couch said attempts in the same propaganda the Klan used to use to cement their system of brutal oppression.
 
bomberfox said:
I care that you want to drag us back to the heinous victorian racism that existed in America. Trying to couch said attempts in the same propaganda the Klan used to use to cement their system of brutal oppression.
Click to expand...

Wanting to keep white traits is not the same as reviving racism. You are being hysterical.
 
Wan said:
Wanting to keep white traits is not the same as reviving racism. You are being hysterical.
Click to expand...

That is just the subtext. You provided the text earlier in the thread. Its time to show your “power level”
 
bomberfox said:
That is just the subtext. You provided the text earlier in the thread. Its time to show your “power level”
Click to expand...

Lol wut? I have no idea what you meant by "power level".
 
dixon01767 said:
???? uh, NO. They were ruled as unconstitutional discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause. Discrimination on the basis of race
Click to expand...

stop with the jokes we know your not so foolish

if a woman can marry you and i cant thats not equality now is it

but you know that oh you had me going for a second how naughty


oh you are at it again haha but i know you know that if saying someone is discriminated against by race by not being able to marry someone of another race while others can mary that same person because of race then you know that we are discriminated against by gender if we cant marry 1 another because we are men while other people can marry us if they are women


stop with this farcical comedy its to much
 
Wan said:
Some feel that anti-miscegenation laws were a good thing. I am one of them. It's too bad they were unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

 
Wan said:
More people than you realize are "racial separatists". They might not say anything in public but in private they only want to associate with other white people.
Click to expand...

but more of us then that will tell those assholes to go to hell
 
blarg said:
but more of us then that will tell those assholes to go to hell
Click to expand...
So people deserve to "go to hell' just because they do something you dont like (namely, associating with other white people only)?
 
Wan said:
Yes race-mixing increases genetic diversity, however phenotypic diversity will decrease, for the simple reason that traits like blond/red hair, blue/green eyes are recessive and will be mixed out of existence if a white procreates with a black. Surely this is not a good thing.

Also I am not religious.
Click to expand...

that seems stupid because even if you mix races you're going to get expressed recessive genes as soon as they hook up within an individual whose parents both had them and that made it on to the right sperm and egg cell for example my and 2 of my sibling have brown hair and one of my brothers is blond


surly you are only pretending to say such foolish things to get a rise out of us
 
Wan said:
So people deserve to "go to hell' just because they do something you dont like (namely, associating with other white people only)?
Click to expand...

no they deserve to go to hell if they want to stop other people from being able to freely associate based on race


glad i could clear up why those people are assholes who can go to hell
 
blarg said:
that seems stupid because even if you mix races you're going to get expressed recessive genes as soon as they hook up within an individual whose parents both had them and that made it on to the right sperm and egg cell for example my and 2 of my sibling have brown hair and one of my brothers is blond
Click to expand...
Recombination of recessive genes only works in a closed gene pool. We don't have that. We have an open gene pool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom