• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wanting laws that force people to recognize your gender is pure narcissism

It isn't abuse to call someone something other than what they wish to be called.

Your ethics regarding authority are disgusting and I fear for anyone subject to yours.
 
Than write me off as a bigot.

You obviously hate transgenders and want to see them abused by their professional caregivers.

Your ethical failings in this are many and deplorable.
 
You obviously hate transgenders and want to see them abused by their professional caregivers.

Your ethical failings in this are many and deplorable.

So write me off as a bigot if it makes you feel better. You won't shame me into agreement. So stop trying
 
So write me off as a bigot if it makes you feel better. You won't shame me into agreement. So stop trying

You think I give a **** what you think? Haha. I wouldn't piss in your pot. I write for the audience.
 
You think I give a **** what you think? Haha. I wouldn't piss in your pot. I write for the audience.

Yes I do, you keep responding to me. And you are desperate to indicate that you don't. If you didn't your behavior would be different.
 
Yes I do, you keep responding to me. And you are desperate to indicate that you don't. If you didn't your behavior would be different.

Don't be psychotic.
 

We're on a debate website. I'm debating the legitimacy of a law and illustrating the lack of ethics and character in those that would support abuse by authority.

You believe everything is about you - that's psychotic.
 
We're on a debate website. I'm debating the legitimacy of a law and illustrating the lack of ethics and character in those that would support abuse by authority.

You believe everything is about you - that's psychotic.

So write me off as "psychic."
 
So write me off as "psychic."

I'm not interested in writing you anything. You mean nothing to my points. You're just a tool for illustrating them.
 
It's not different. It's the same. But the law didn't recognize that. So a law needed to be added to protect disabled transgender people. You don't have a problem with that, right?

I do.
 
I'm not interested in writing you anything. You mean nothing to my points. You're just a tool for illustrating them.

I think you suffer from some existential angst. I don't think you really believe what you're telling me. it sounds more like you're trying to convince yourself
 
I think you suffer from some existential angst. I don't think you really believe what you're telling me. it sounds more like you're trying to convince yourself

A minute ago it was all about you.

:screwy
 
Last edited:
Sure it was.

That's what you claimed. "This is just all about me." Now you're, "this is just all about you".

Anything to avoid the subject and your dismal failure.
 
It's a shame that you don't believe professional caregivers are held to criminal standards. Professional caregivers are not allowed to abuse those in their care - it's criminal. That you can't understand that says volumes about your ethics.

"Criminal words." :roll:

However, you certainly are not the only Democrat I've read who wants to criminal free speech - but selectively.

If a person "in care" was telling everyone that the Hilary Clinton ordered many people murdered and is in collusion with Russians, you claim all caregivers would have to agree with that person to that person - and if not whoever doesn't should be criminally prosecuted, correct?
 
Professional caregivers abusing patients is illegal. Deal with it.

Cite a case where a caregiver was prosecuted for words that contradicted the words of the person they are caring for. Any case.
 
"Criminal words." :roll:

However, you certainly are not the only Democrat I've read who wants to criminal free speech - but selectively.

If a person "in care" was telling everyone that the Hilary Clinton ordered many people murdered and is in collusion with Russians, you claim all caregivers would have to agree with that person to that person - and if not whoever doesn't should be criminally prosecuted, correct?

Never liked laws that compel speech. And I don't see how they will hold up in the courts. You may be fired, you may have licensure removed, but arrested?

The idea is that it's abuse. Funny when I was a bit in elementary school and I was getting upset about people calling me names my dad told me " sticks and stones..."

It's amazing that a boy in third grade was more socially well adjusted than adults.
 
Back
Top Bottom