• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wild Sex or sex in the wild, OMG! Look what it did to us.

Not sex. Rape. Neanderthals were massively more powerful a predator than other humanoids. However, humanoids had higher intelligence and a stronger sense of socialization, allowing the weaker species to organize and collectively group hunt down Neanderthals.

This is a very interesting theory. Compare the bone structure size of a neanderthal to other humanoids:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZbmywzGAVs
 
Not sex. Rape. Neanderthals were massively more powerful a predator than other humanoids. However, humanoids had higher intelligence and a stronger sense of socialization, allowing the weaker species to organize and collectively group hunt down Neanderthals.

Sad but entirely the most likely, especially in primitive societies where the idea of anyone having 'rights' but the strongest male would be millenia away. The ownership of the enemy's women has always been among the spoils of war: as recently as the middle ages and even ISIL who base their ideas on that period, taking women was considered the conqueror's due. Even when frowned upon such as in WWII and other more recent conflicts, it was made permissible by commanders turning a blind when when their men did it (Stalin's famous dismissal of the complaint made by allies) or making up excuses to justify it (Japan's 'comfort women').

The most obvious is result is that as outsiders, the surviving females of a defeated hominid tribe would have been raped by their conquerors and kept as concubines. Their children would have fared little better when coming of age and on it went until some generations later they were integrated into the gene pool.
 
Not sex. Rape. Neanderthals were massively more powerful a predator than other humanoids. However, humanoids had higher intelligence and a stronger sense of socialization, allowing the weaker species to organize and collectively group hunt down Neanderthals.

This is a very interesting theory. Compare the bone structure size of a neanderthal to other humanoids:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZbmywzGAVs

There is no evidence of rape, nor is their evidence of higher intelligence.

Besides, some women prefer the relatively brainless muscle mass.
 
Somewhere in the distant mists of time, a part of our heritage.
 
Somewhere in the distant mists of time, a part of our heritage.

We share 60% of the human genome with bananas. That explains our politicians. Neanderthals present a more positive image.
 
There is no evidence of rape, nor is their evidence of higher intelligence.

Besides, some women prefer the relatively brainless muscle mass.

Brain to body size in fact does indicate superior intelligence. There is no evidence of feminism or equal rights laws among primates. :roll:
 
The theory of the video is the violent interaction with powerful predatory Neanderthals fully dependent on a meat diet and proven to be cannibals in ice age Europe with docile humanoids in the warm ME both sociologically and genetically produced the violent and war tendencies of modern homo sapiens that is not present in any other primates.
 
Brain to body size in fact does indicate superior intelligence. There is no evidence of feminism or equal rights laws among primates. :roll:

Some might view the latter as a sign of superior intelligence. Haven't you learned, size doesn't matter?
 

I found another study in the pervert's journal of medicine that hypothesizes beastiality was also a major issue during the paleolithic era. Whist the neanderthal's wives slumbered, the men would sneak out of their caves and have their way with a slumbering brontosaurus. Now, I know you're going to try to pick this one apart and claim dinosaurs existed during an entirely different time-period, but much like man-made climate change, that's a myth! After all, the earth is only a few thousand years old - there's not enough time for these two species to have existed separately.

I rest my case.
 
I found another study in the pervert's journal of medicine that hypothesizes beastiality was also a major issue during the paleolithic era. Whist the neanderthal's wives slumbered, the men would sneak out of their caves and have their way with a slumbering brontosaurus. Now, I know you're going to try to pick this one apart and claim dinosaurs existed during an entirely different time-period, but much like man-made climate change, that's a myth! After all, the earth is only a few thousand years old - there's not enough time for these two species to have existed separately.

I rest my case.

Syphillis came to humans by having sexual intercourse with sheep.
 
Syphillis came to humans by having sexual intercourse with sheep.

That is some really baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhd information, sir.!
 
Back
Top Bottom