• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The most enjoyable commands for your obedient chick?

<alt>doxygen said:
I was never into hard-core submissives.
Click to expand...

You know, finding them is half the fun. It gives such an adrenaline rush finding a non-pro that passes my submissiveness test.
 
SDET said:
You know, finding them is half the fun. It gives such an adrenaline rush finding a non-pro that passes my submissiveness test.
Click to expand...

That's a lot of words for "I've never made a woman orgasm before".
 
Tanngrisnir said:
That's a lot of words for "I've never made a woman orgasm before".
Click to expand...
That sounds a bit pot and kettle.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
SDET said:
I'm only talking about the D part of BDSM.

That's a very interesting perspective. The man gets unquestioned authority and the woman gets a pass from taking responsibility for anything. For starters, no employer to worry about, no bills to keep track of, even English literacy becomes optional.

Even in a temporary arrangement, the woman gets to experience a level of luxury beyond her imagination. Many women naturally take to the role of servant.
Click to expand...

This is only a small part of the Dominance part of D. And very Straight Male Dom centric at that. And no the Dom(me) does not get unquestioned authority, only as much the sub gives up. Yes it can go as far as complete power exchange with safe words abandoned, but a vast majority does not go there. Some subs don't experience luxury, but the complete opposite, because that is what they want. The variations in the D/s relationship are myriad. BDSM rule #2: There is no one true way.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
SDET said:
One nice starter, especially if you have never met her before is for her to undress and kneel as soon as she walks in your door. It's a good litmus test to see if she will obey your commands without hesitation. If she is someone that you're in a relationship with, explain some fun stuff that you learned from another woman and command her to do an act that reminds you of the other woman. Making sure that she puts all the effort into the fun is another winner.

What commands do you enjoy issuing the most?
Click to expand...

Well, I date women, not barn animals so I don't give any commands
 
Kal'Stang said:
Personally I never understood the BDSM lifestyle. Seems too degrading to me.

That said, BDSM is actually quite prevalent in the US. In fact it is more prevalent in the US than the rest of the world. And apparently even has some health benefits.

Smithsonian.com ~ Americans Are More Into BDSM Than The Rest of the World
Click to expand...
It can be, and usually that is what the participants want, at least during a session. But there are many other aspects where there is no degradation. Shabri, for example can be highly comforting for both rigger and bound. For some, the impact plays releases endorphins for a wonderful experience. Age play hold no degradation at all, as the little isn't shamed for being little. The lifestyle is so much more than gets displayed in popular literature and media.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
Sampson Simpson said:
Well, I date women, not barn animals so I don't give any commands
Click to expand...
Being a submissive does not make a woman any less of a woman, nor a man any less of a man. As a submissive, they want those commands, even if it is only for that hour session. Not all women are submissives, and that's fine. There are men who are, and that's fine.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
Sampson Simpson said:
Well, I date women, not barn animals so I don't give any commands
Click to expand...

Well, that's rather elitist (or racist) of you: Referring to indigenous women as barn animals. Duly noted!
 
Last edited:
maquiscat said:
Being a submissive does not make a woman any less of a woman, nor a man any less of a man. As a submissive, they want those commands, even if it is only for that hour session. Not all women are submissives, and that's fine. There are men who are, and that's fine.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

My interactions are with women desperate for a man's attention and relief from material want. They are so overjoyed to get what they want that being a servant, sexual or otherwise in inconsequential.
 
SDET said:
My interactions are with women desperate for a man's attention and relief from material want. They are so overjoyed to get what they want that being a servant, sexual or otherwise in inconsequential.
Click to expand...
And that's fine in and of itself. But the way you have presented many of your posts, leaves an impression of that being the only way. So I am just making sure that it is understood that yours is not all there is.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
I see SDET is making a late entry for the most misogynistic post of the year award.
 
SDET said:
One nice starter, especially if you have never met her before is for her to undress and kneel as soon as she walks in your door. It's a good litmus test to see if she will obey your commands without hesitation. If she is someone that you're in a relationship with, explain some fun stuff that you learned from another woman and command her to do an act that reminds you of the other woman. Making sure that she puts all the effort into the fun is another winner.

What commands do you enjoy issuing the most?
Click to expand...


Slay the masters, slay the soldiers, slay every man who holds a whip, but harm no child. Strike the chains of every slave you see!
 
Carjosse said:
I see SDET is making a late entry for the most misogynistic post of the year award.
Click to expand...

The sad thing is that , no, it's not a 'late entry'.
 
RAMOSS said:
The sad thing is that , no, it's not a 'late entry'.
Click to expand...

IMO it's sad to see such a need for submissiveness in others so prominently featured, over and over. Kind of an odd thing to be proud of IMO, since it indicates someone who cannot command respect on equal footing with others.
 
RAMOSS said:
Slay the masters, slay the soldiers, slay every man who holds a whip, but harm no child. Strike the chains of every slave you see!
Click to expand...
What do you do for the women holding whips, the Mistresses?

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
SDET said:
You ask about relationships. There are 7 billion people on this planet. If you search with enough effort, you can find almost any kind of person you want.

If people are deciding to defend homosexuals, why not this? It's something I enjoy and am successfully able to arrange. I'm not breaking any laws. Since this gay rights movement has taken over, why the hell should I show much restraint. The cultural Marxists are such hypocrites. Everyone is supposed to do whatever they want, right?

If society doesn't want to put any effort into doing what's "right", why should I?
Click to expand...

So you're being obtuse, idiotic and misogynistic is in retaliation for others' acceptance of gay people. Pretty childish way to get to try to get your point across, IMO.
 
lurchadams said:
So you're being obtuse, idiotic and misogynistic is in retaliation for others' acceptance of gay people. Pretty childish way to get to try to get your point across, IMO.
Click to expand...

You're replying to my other thread, but that's OK. It's not to get a point across. If homosexuals aren't being held to any standard, so why should I be? Cultural Marxists only want to break down standards when it suits them. They hypocritically want people to still comply with THEIR standards. I will pass on that, thank you very much.
 
SDET said:
You're replying to my other thread, but that's OK. It's not to get a point across. If homosexuals aren't being held to any standard, so why should I be? Cultural Marxists only want to break down standards when it suits them. They hypocritically want people to still comply with THEIR standards. I will pass on that, thank you very much.
Click to expand...

What standards are gays not held to that you feel you are? What are 'their standards?'
 
SDET said:
One nice starter, especially if you have never met her before is for her to undress and kneel as soon as she walks in your door. It's a good litmus test to see if she will obey your commands without hesitation. If she is someone that you're in a relationship with, explain some fun stuff that you learned from another woman and command her to do an act that reminds you of the other woman. Making sure that she puts all the effort into the fun is another winner.

What commands do you enjoy issuing the most?
Click to expand...

Red:
Seriously?

If I answer by saying "the usual ones," do you know what that means? I sure hope so because I'm not going into more detail than that.
 
SDET said:
You're replying to my other thread, but that's OK. It's not to get a point across. If homosexuals aren't being held to any standard, so why should I be? Cultural Marxists only want to break down standards when it suits them. They hypocritically want people to still comply with THEIR standards. I will pass on that, thank you very much.
Click to expand...

If you really were into the BDSM lifestyle, I promise you I wouldn't judge. The reason your post is disappointing is that you're taking a false position, basically to troll people tolerant of homosexuals. The only person angry here is you.
 
lurchadams said:
If you really were into the BDSM lifestyle, I promise you I wouldn't judge. The reason your post is disappointing is that you're taking a false position, basically to troll people tolerant of homosexuals. The only person angry here is you.
Click to expand...

When you cast the labels aside, it boils down to this: I will do whatever the heck I want. People and entities that try to pressure otherwise get the boot. Meeting others expectations just isn't worth the effort. The premise of my marriage was I wanted and still want on-demand sex, she wanted to never need to seek employment. I was prepared to lose her, but apparently she is willing to tolerate almost anything as long as she doesn't need to seek employment. There are others like her, but much younger where she came from that accept short term arrangements. However, to save her any embarrassment, I would never seek out anyone within 500 km from where she was raised. Before she met me, she was the late-teens plaything. Now it's her turn to be the tolerant wife. I'm not quite sure I understand this mindset of "anything but a job".

She told me about her boyfriend at the time's wife gave her dad an earful demanding that he control his daughter.
 
SDET said:
When you cast the labels aside, it boils down to this: I will do whatever the heck I want. People and entities that try to pressure otherwise get the boot. Meeting others expectations just isn't worth the effort. The premise of my marriage was I wanted and still want on-demand sex, she wanted to never need to seek employment. I was prepared to lose her, but apparently she is willing to tolerate almost anything as long as she doesn't need to seek employment. There are others like her, but much younger where she came from that accept short term arrangements. However, to save her any embarrassment, I would never seek out anyone within 500 km from where she was raised. Before she met me, she was the late-teens plaything. Now it's her turn to be the tolerant wife. I'm not quite sure I understand this mindset of "anything but a job".

She told me about her boyfriend at the time's wife gave her dad an earful demanding that he control his daughter.
Click to expand...

So you're a sugar daddy. Got it. To each their own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom