• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Orgasm control, also referred to as edging, peaking, or surfing

C

crazyme

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
687
Reaction score
14
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
is a sexual technique which may be practiced either alone or with a partner and involves the maintenance of a high level of sexual arousal for an extended period of time without reaching climax.


In this practice, orgasm is separated from ejaculation, making possible enjoyment of the pleasure of sexual intercourse without experiencing seminal ejaculation, while still experiencing orgasm.

(an internal 'orgasm' with no outwardly 'ejaculation') This affects both the brain, to which the mystical consciousness can come from. But this can also cause many bodily complications, such as 'stomach', and other 'digestive' tract and digestive 'organs', such as the gall bladder, the pancreas and the others.


Another possibility is for one partner to help produce multiple orgasms in the other.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coitus_reservatus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm_control
 
With such 'sexual' practices, the ejaculation is often times much more powerful than from ordinary ejaculations. The reason being possibly is the body being 'freed' to its inner 'tortures' of needing to contain within itself what it would normally have expleted by that time.


The same idea can be applied to 'urine holding' or 'fecal holding'. The longer it is held within, the greater the 'pleasure' of it being released.


The 'edging' is comparable to the 'retaining'.


It would be no different if a person had 'joys' or pleasures in such 'urine retaining' or 'fecal retaining' self pleasures than if it was being done to 'ejaculating'. The only difference is that 'sex' is more 'glamorized' than urine or fecal. And that there are more 'participants' who 'glamorize' the sexual 'edging' more than there are participants who 'glamorize' urine and/or fecal retaining.

Semen, urine and fecal are all 'products' which the body is seeking to expel from itself.

Just as urine and fecal are produced by drinks and foods, so too could the semen. And when there is an overabundance, as with both liquids and 'foods', the body will seek to expel the excess. And so that is where 'ejaculation' comes in for the semen. But because urinating and defecating are natural 'body' functions, so too is 'ejaculating'. When you gotta go, you gotta go.


Unlike peeing or pooing though, when the body tells you that it is time to go with the 'semen', it takes a little more 'work/effort' on/to the person than to pee or poo.

i'm sure if I voluntary held in my pee when the body was telling me to pee that the pee would be expelled somehow. But because I do not desire those sorts of 'accidents', I voluntarily go to the bathroom like a big boy/girl.

And why be criticized for letting the body expel what it needs?

But of course, with everything expleted out from the body, including spittle, there are many little 'germs' and bacteria within all of those. And if another 'life' form were to receive it, they would be 'responsible' for those little 'germs' and bacteria.

Using a condom or any internal 'prophylactic' does not exempt the person from receiving any 'germs' or bacteria. The 'germs' and bacteria(s) could be on the 'prophylactic' themselves just as there are many 'germs' and bacteria(s) in the common fast food ice used to pour your drink within.
 
Last edited:
What's the discussion here?

And I didnt read the links, isnt this similar to practicing Tantric sex?
 
:thinking
 
Lursa said:
What's the discussion here?

And I didnt read the links, isnt this similar to practicing Tantric sex?
Click to expand...

OP is odd, he often just posts Wikipedia links and just copies and pastes sections of it.

Everyone has their thing I guess.
 
Maybe this is how they “get off?”
 
Not only the ice in fast food stores but also the paper monies. But most of the 'germs' and bacteria(s) on these do not come from those bodily discharged 'things'.

The 'germs' and bacteria(s) which come from 'within' the body might be different than the germs and bacteria(s) which come from outside of the body.


Even 'blood', which comes from within the body, is known to be a vessel in which germs and bacteria can travel within. So is 'breath' which is why there are T.B tests and clearances.


So if you think about it, which person might have the less transmuted germs and bacteria from another 'human'? Those that do alot of socializing or those that do not? Even though the 'homeless' might appear very 'dirty' on the outside, they do very little human interacting in close proximities which would have them have those 'germs' and bacteria(s) which are within them from those things which are from outside of them, such as the sidewalks, pollution, near by urinals, etc...


Most of the germs and bacteria(s) they would receive would be from 'air', and/or 'hand to mouth' transmissions. Which could 'isolate' the source of their 'illness' more than if a social person were to get the same 'illness'.


The same germs and bacteria(s) which are found in 'trash' cans can be found on basic restaurant floors or even fast food tables left unwiped and uncleaned after each 'eating'.


That is why a kitchen worker, even in fast food restaurants, need their T.B. clearance. So they do not pass any airborne 'germs' to any others, including 'foods'.


Not only that but when you 'dine' within such restaurants, you are actually 'sharing' the common 'air' which everyone in there shares. As far as any 'circulation' to allow for new clean air to enter and the old air to be 'released' is concerned, that is where central airs and open doors would allow for new airs to come in. That 'natural' airs which come in through open doors and windows are probably alot less 'germ' and bacteria filled than if the dining area were closed off with only a central circulating system.

Unless those ducts are cleaned out on a regular basis, dust, mold, bacteria(s), germs, etc can be resting within them and if not taken cared of properly can be dangerous; since mold can combust and cause an explosion.
 
Last edited:
:thinking
 
Mold can be formed out of 'dust' which clump together and are moistened.

The 'dust' which can be found on your bathroom air vent screen, if not cleaned, can turn into 'mold'. And if the central circulation system is not properly maintained for cleanliness, of course it will need to be.


Not only that but a cleaner 'breathing' experience is always nicer to the customers, wouldn't you think? I mean, if they are going to go spend 'cash' where you work, it would be nice to thank them with nice clean air as well as with other 'appreciations', right?


No customer enjoys going to a place 'dirtier' than their own home, right?

But at the same time, there are 'malls' or shopping centers, with the owner/s having lots of monies not tending to their own property. With all that monies, you would think they would keep their property clean and enjoyable for the customers, right?


Have you been to the local supermarket? What is the cleanliness and 'enjoy-ability' level at? Or the local Electric Company or the local neighborhood?


How would your 'enjoy-ability' be within a place like the Oneida Community?

The Oneida community believed strongly in a system of free love (a term Noyes is credited with coining) known as complex marriage,[5] where any member was free to have sex with any other who consented.[6] Possessiveness and exclusive relationships were frowned upon.[7] Unlike 20th-century social movements such as the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, the Oneidans did not seek consequence-free sex for pleasure, but believed that, because the natural outcome of intercourse was pregnancy, raising children should be a communal responsibility. Women over the age of 40 were to act as sexual "mentors" to adolescent boys, as these relationships had minimal chance of conceiving. Furthermore, these women became religious role models for the young men. Likewise, older men often introduced young women to sex. Noyes often used his own judgment in determining the partnerships that would form, and would often encourage relationships between the non-devout and the devout in the community, in the hopes that the attitudes and behaviors of the devout would influence the non-devout.[8]

In 1993, the archives of the community were made available to scholars for the first time. Contained within the archives was the journal of Tirzah Miller,[9] Noyes' niece, who wrote extensively about her romantic and sexual relations with other members of Oneida

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community



.....the Oneidans did not seek consequence-free sex for pleasure


What forms of STDs were around New York in and around the year 1850?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgiokyiDmCY
 
Last edited:
crazyme said:
In this practice, orgasm is separated from ejaculation, making possible enjoyment of the pleasure of sexual intercourse without experiencing seminal ejaculation, while still experiencing orgasm.
Click to expand...

Ignoring all your posts that go nowhere near the topic, this paragraph is a major conceptual error, not even matching your linked articles.

Edging is not the separation of the orgasm and ejaculation, which is indeed a possible thing, but a denial of an orgasm. Edging can be done on both men and women so the concept of seperating orgasm from ejaculation doesn't hold true .

Edging is about bringing someone, either self or other, to the brink, or edge, of an orgasm and then halting the stimulation before they actually have the orgasm. It is most often used in a D/s context.

Now to be sure, males can condition themselves to have orgasms without ejaculation. The most common method is to work them to an orgasm shortly after one with an ejaculation, although it is also possible to achieve multiple ejaculations in a short period too, just not as common.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
anybody know what caused the OP to come up with that user name?
 
maquiscat said:
Ignoring all your posts that go nowhere near the topic, this paragraph is a major conceptual error, not even matching your linked articles.

Edging is not the separation of the orgasm and ejaculation, which is indeed a possible thing, but a denial of an orgasm. Edging can be done on both men and women so the concept of seperating orgasm from ejaculation doesn't hold true .

Edging is about bringing someone, either self or other, to the brink, or edge, of an orgasm and then halting the stimulation before they actually have the orgasm. It is most often used in a D/s context.

Now to be sure, males can condition themselves to have orgasms without ejaculation. The most common method is to work them to an orgasm shortly after one with an ejaculation, although it is also possible to achieve multiple ejaculations in a short period too, just not as common.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I have not done this because I want my women cumming, but it looks to many like many subs are not allowed to come without permission, that they have to train themselves to not come no matter what is done to them, and if they fail they get punished.

Edging of a certain flavor I suppose, distinct from those who get themselves to the edge and then stop, letting the frustration do its work.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
I have not done this because I want my women cumming, but it looks to many like many subs are not allowed to come without permission, that they have to train themselves to not come no matter what is done to them, and if they fail they get punished.

Edging of a certain flavor I suppose, distinct from those who get themselves to the edge and then stop, letting the frustration do its work.
Click to expand...

Some seek that level of control and/or frustration from their Doms. Others do not. And while the whole "don't orgasm without permission" thing is great fodder for the porn stories, it's not really often done. Some do, in fact, do so, but it isn't as common as stories might make it seem.

I personally don't do so either, unless specifically asked for permission, in which case I don't it briefly. And if they're asking, they are wanting me to deny them that release, at least briefly. I don't wait too long though. It's not my thing either

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
Sheesh, I already have enough work with faking it.

:lol:
 
crazyme said:
is a sexual technique which may be practiced either alone or with a partner and involves the maintenance of a high level of sexual arousal for an extended period of time without reaching climax.


In this practice, orgasm is separated from ejaculation, making possible enjoyment of the pleasure of sexual intercourse without experiencing seminal ejaculation, while still experiencing orgasm.

(an internal 'orgasm' with no outwardly 'ejaculation') This affects both the brain, to which the mystical consciousness can come from. But this can also cause many bodily complications, such as 'stomach', and other 'digestive' tract and digestive 'organs', such as the gall bladder, the pancreas and the others.


Another possibility is for one partner to help produce multiple orgasms in the other.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coitus_reservatus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm_control
Click to expand...

I'm thinking you practice alone. Just teasing. So you're not talking about, "edging". You're talking about a male having an actual orgasm without ejactulating?

I have a genuine alien artifact for sale I stole when I jumped the fence at Area 51. I'll make you a good deal :)
 
Lursa said:
What's the discussion here?

And I didnt read the links, isnt this similar to practicing Tantric sex?
Click to expand...

I was going to say, "don't ask". But, too late!!
 
lurchadams said:
I was going to say, "don't ask". But, too late!!
Click to expand...

Yeah, I immediately regretted it...a bunch of odd random stuff posted by OP after...so I bailed.
 
lurchadams said:
I'm thinking you practice alone. Just teasing. So you're not talking about, "edging". You're talking about a male having an actual orgasm without ejactulating?

I have a genuine alien artifact for sale I stole when I jumped the fence at Area 51. I'll make you a good deal :)
Click to expand...

Actually, I've done it. Not too often mind you, but not just once either. From experience, best chance of doing so is shortly after having an orgasm with ejaculation.
 
maquiscat said:
Actually, I've done it. Not too often mind you, but not just once either. From experience, best chance of doing so is shortly after having an orgasm with ejaculation.
Click to expand...

And I've seen Sasquatch :)
 
lurchadams said:
The porn industry would go broke if male performers came that way.. "Trust me baby, I came. Was it good for you"?

I just wish I could poop and no solids ever came out. It would both accomplish the task and leave much less of a mess.

Just like your mythical orgasms :)
Click to expand...
Wow! Documented from an actual medical source and still won't accept reality. That's some Flat Earther level denial going on there. Setting aside both the fact that those "money shots" are edited in and no encounter on a porno ever happens in one shot, we still have the point that this isn't a frequent thing, nor with all men. But it is a real occurrence, and from what I have read, something you can train your body to do. Why would you? Oh maybe because there is a "reset" period before male body can ejaculate again, but you can still orgasm, resulting in more pleasure for the man. Maybe you want less pleasure during sex. Me, I'll go for more.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom