- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 12,099
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
This video will no doubt create tons of controversy but this is a doctor's view on being transgender, not that I agree or disagree with her.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2-e_wJthmk
I peer into my crystal ball and see a doctor of philosophy talking mad crap. Could be medical and unrelated, the future is foggy.
Someone click and see if I'm psychic.
It's a medical doctor telling simple, politically incorrect truth.
What kind of medical doctor. Sports?
I received my medical degree from the University of Connecticut and completed my internship and residency in pediatrics at the Connecticut Children's Medical Center. I did some additional training in adolescence at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia, and had the privilege to practice general pediatrics for fifteen years before going on full-time with the American College of Pediatricians in advocacy for children. I am entering my second term as president with that organization.
The below came from her interview...
Not having watched the video, why do you feel this person's view is "the truth"?
The American College of Pediatricians is basically the Bizarro World version of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Like the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) pushes and promotes “misleading and incorrect” recommendations based on the ideology of their members, not using science and evidenced based medicine. “…ACPeds was born from an ideological split within a profession. It was founded in 2002 as a protest against the much larger American Academy of Pediatrics’ support for LGBT adoption rights — and that opposition remains central to the group’s identity… But thanks to its deceptive name — which makes it sound as if it is the mainstream professional organization for pediatricians — ACPeds often serves as a supposedly scientific source for groups pushing utter falsehoods about LGBT people.”
That’s why most of the press releases and position statements from the ACPeds are against (while the AAP supports):
homosexual parents
HPV vaccination
protecting transgender kids
comprehensive sex education, wanting to focus instead on abstinence only sex education
emergency contraception
same sex marriage
Michelle A. Cretella, MD, FCP (Fellow of the College of Pediatricians), the President of the American College of Pediatricians, has even praised the book Preventing Homosexuality, calling it “an invaluable resource for parents.” She is also on the Board of Directors of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), a group that supports reparative or conversion therapy for homosexuals.
The American College of Pediatricians goes so far as suggesting adding a ‘P’ to LGBT acronym. No, the ‘P’ wouldn’t stand for pansexual in their world – it would stand for pedophile.
https://keepkidshealthy.com/2017/09/06/what-is-the-american-college-of-pediatricians/
Because her arguments are valid and sound.
The American College of Pediatricians is not the same as The American Academy of Pediatrics. The two groups are completely different. The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) is considered a fringe group and should never be confused with the mainstream American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Short version: How To Lie With Acronyms
Disguising yourself as a reasonable group of medical professionals when you’re just another cesspool of wingnut hate. These people are despicable, as are anyone who claims that their twisted, evil views are “the truth.”
To be fair, busting out "the truth" (regardless of context) is fair warning of entering wackyland. I'm gonna go ahead and hit enter without searching my username and keyword truth. I think I'm safe.
Could be related. General physician or psychiatrist matters. But it's not a phd, so gratz.
Valid arguments aren’t always “the truth.”
So she is unqualified to say that there are only boys and girls because she doesn't have a Ph.D?
No, she's unqualified because she's not saying what 'they' want to hear.
I'll stick with the DNA, 'they' can have thwir feelings.
So she is unqualified to say that there are only boys and girls because she doesn't have a Ph.D?
So funny.
The sad thing is you're laughing at yourself.
They're being only two Sexes is the most basic concept in human biology
Gender is a social construct, not biological.
Actually variation is quite rare.This is a matter that is clearly way over her head. Sexuality is not binary, she meant to say sex which she is also confusing with gender. How can a native speaker, let alone a doctor speaking about the subject of sex not know this is beyond me. She refers to reproduction being "the rule" but what rule is that? she falsely claims that there is a binary of XX or XY, any person here (let alone a doctor) would know that THE sex chromosomes a person is born with are not binary; there are plenty of variation.
I would agree with her, body integrity dismophic disorder is a psychological issueHer next argument about thoughts and feelings being not biological is not accurate either, biology and chemistry influences how the brain develops and can influences "thoughts and feelings" that is why drugs can affect a persons mental health positively or negatively.
Individuals with DSD are not used as "pawns", they are mentioned because their existance disproves the definition you are using to claim sex is binary. Even if you are going to use a definition of sex that is binary, it says nothing about whether gender would be binary or whether it must correspond to sex.